[a]J. Óbertová

Path integral treatment of coherence effects in charmonium production in nuclear ultra-peripheral collisions

   J. Nemchik
Abstract

We present for the first time a revised study of charmonium production in nuclear ultra-peripheral collisions (UPC) based on a rigorous Green function formalism. This formalism allows for the proper incorporation of the effects of color transparency, as well as the quantum coherence inherent in the higher twist quark shadowing related to the QQ¯𝑄¯𝑄Q\bar{Q}italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG Fock component of the photon. The significance of this effect gradually decreases towards forward and/or backward rapidities. In the LHC kinematic region we additionally incorporate within the same formalism the leading twist gluon shadowing corrections related to higher multi-gluon photon fluctuations. They represent a dominant source of nuclear phenomena in the mid-rapidity region. Model predictions for the rapidity distributions dσ/dy𝑑𝜎𝑑𝑦d\sigma/dyitalic_d italic_σ / italic_d italic_y are in good agreement with available UPC data on coherent charmonium production at RHIC and the LHC. They can also be verified by future measurements at the LHC, as well as at EIC.

1 Introduction

The study of heavy quarkonium production in heavy-ion collisions can help us to extend our understanding of the QCD dynamics, as well as manifestations of various nuclear effects, such as quantum coherence, color transparency, gluon shadowing and gluon saturation. The production of charmonia in photo-nuclear reactions (Q20superscript𝑄20Q^{2}\approx 0italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≈ 0) is recently intensively studied in ultra-peripheral Pb-Pb collisions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and in Au-Au UPC at Relativistic Heavy Ion collider (RHIC). Here, the gluon shadowing (GS) corrections at LHC energies and the reduced effects of quantum coherence in the forward/backward rapidity region are often neglected or incorporated inaccurately in most of the current calculations. In this contribution, we refer on our study of coherent (elastic) photoproduction of charmonia, γAVA𝛾𝐴𝑉𝐴\gamma A\to VAitalic_γ italic_A → italic_V italic_A [V = J/ψ(1S),ψ(2S)𝐽𝜓1𝑆superscript𝜓2𝑆J\!/\!\psi(1S),\psi^{\,\prime}(2S)italic_J / italic_ψ ( 1 italic_S ) , italic_ψ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 italic_S )], in UPC, extended to charmonium electroproduction, γAVAsuperscript𝛾𝐴𝑉𝐴\gamma^{*}A\to VAitalic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A → italic_V italic_A, in expected Electron-Ion-Collider (EIC) kinematic region within the light-front (LF) color dipole approach. We focus on the proper treatment of reduced effects of the coherence length using the Green function technique.

2 Green function formalism for the coherent photo-nuclear reaction

The cross section for photo-nuclear reaction in a heavy-ion UPC, derived in the one-photon-exchange approximation and expressed in the rest frame of the target nucleus A𝐴Aitalic_A [1], is defined as follows:

kdσdk=d2τd2bn(k,bτ,y)d2σA(s,b)d2b+{yy}.𝑘𝑑𝜎𝑑𝑘superscript𝑑2𝜏superscript𝑑2𝑏𝑛𝑘𝑏𝜏𝑦superscript𝑑2subscript𝜎𝐴𝑠𝑏superscript𝑑2𝑏𝑦𝑦k\frac{d\sigma}{dk}=\int\,d^{2}\tau\int\,d^{2}b\,\,n(k,\vec{b}-\vec{\tau},y)\,% \frac{d^{2}\sigma_{A}(s,b)}{d^{2}b}~{}~{}+~{}~{}\Bigl{\{}y\rightarrow-y\Bigr{% \}}\,.italic_k divide start_ARG italic_d italic_σ end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_k end_ARG = ∫ italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_τ ∫ italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b italic_n ( italic_k , over→ start_ARG italic_b end_ARG - over→ start_ARG italic_τ end_ARG , italic_y ) divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_s , italic_b ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_ARG + { italic_y → - italic_y } . (1)

Here the rapidity variable y=ln[s/(MVsN)]ln[(2kMN+MN2)/(MVsN)]𝑦𝑠subscript𝑀𝑉subscript𝑠𝑁2𝑘subscript𝑀𝑁superscriptsubscript𝑀𝑁2subscript𝑀𝑉subscript𝑠𝑁y=\ln\bigl{[}s/(M_{V}\sqrt{s_{N}}~{})\bigr{]}\approx\ln\bigl{[}(2kM_{N}+M_{N}^% {2})/(M_{V}\sqrt{s_{N}}~{})\bigr{]}italic_y = roman_ln [ italic_s / ( italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) ] ≈ roman_ln [ ( 2 italic_k italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT + italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) / ( italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG ) ] with MNsubscript𝑀𝑁M_{N}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and MVsubscript𝑀𝑉M_{V}italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT being the nucleon and vector meson mass, respectively, sNsubscript𝑠𝑁\sqrt{s_{N}}square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG is the collision energy and k𝑘kitalic_k is the photon energy related to the square of the photon-nucleon center-of-mass (c.m.) energy W2=2MNk+MN2Q2sQ2superscript𝑊22subscript𝑀𝑁𝑘superscriptsubscript𝑀𝑁2superscript𝑄2𝑠superscript𝑄2W^{2}=2M_{N}k+M_{N}^{2}-Q^{2}\approx s-Q^{2}italic_W start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 2 italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_k + italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≈ italic_s - italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, where s𝑠sitalic_s is the photon-nucleon c.m. energy squared. The variable τ𝜏\vec{\tau}over→ start_ARG italic_τ end_ARG is the relative impact parameter of a nuclear collision and b𝑏\vec{b}over→ start_ARG italic_b end_ARG is the impact parameter of the photon-nucleon collision relative to the center of one of the nuclei. It holds that τ>2RA𝜏2subscript𝑅𝐴\tau>2R_{A}italic_τ > 2 italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, for a UPC of identical nuclei with the nuclear radius RAsubscript𝑅𝐴R_{A}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The variable n(k,b)𝑛𝑘𝑏n(k,\vec{b})italic_n ( italic_k , over→ start_ARG italic_b end_ARG ) represents the photon flux induced by a projectile nucleus. The corresponding formula for the coherent production cross section has the following form [2, 3]

d2σAcoh(s,b)d2b=14|𝑑zρA(b,z)H1(s,b,z)|2,superscript𝑑2superscriptsubscript𝜎𝐴𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑏superscript𝑑2𝑏14superscriptsuperscriptsubscriptdifferential-d𝑧subscript𝜌𝐴𝑏𝑧subscript𝐻1𝑠𝑏𝑧2\displaystyle\frac{d^{2}\sigma_{A}^{coh}(s,b)}{d^{2}b}=\frac{1}{4}\,\Bigl{|}% \int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty}\,dz\,\rho_{A}({b},z)\,H_{1}(s,{b},z)\,\Bigr{|}^% {2}\,,divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c italic_o italic_h end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_s , italic_b ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_ARG = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG | ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_z italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_b , italic_z ) italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_s , italic_b , italic_z ) | start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (2)

where ρA(b,z)subscript𝜌𝐴𝑏𝑧\rho_{A}(b,z)italic_ρ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_b , italic_z ) is the nuclear density distribution employed in the realistic Wood-Saxon form. The function H1(s,b,z)subscript𝐻1𝑠𝑏𝑧H_{1}(s,b,z)italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_s , italic_b , italic_z ) can be expressed within a rigorous path integral technique as

H1(s,b,z)subscript𝐻1𝑠𝑏𝑧\displaystyle\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!H_{1}(s,b,z)\!\!\!italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_s , italic_b , italic_z ) =\displaystyle== 01𝑑αd2r1d2r2ΨV(r2,α)GQQ¯(z,r2;z,r1)σQQ¯(r1,s)Ψγ(γ)(r1,α).superscriptsubscript01differential-d𝛼superscript𝑑2subscript𝑟1superscript𝑑2subscript𝑟2subscriptsuperscriptΨ𝑉subscript𝑟2𝛼subscript𝐺𝑄¯𝑄superscript𝑧subscript𝑟2𝑧subscript𝑟1subscript𝜎𝑄¯𝑄subscript𝑟1𝑠subscriptΨ𝛾superscript𝛾subscript𝑟1𝛼\displaystyle\!\!\!\!\!\int_{0}^{1}\!\!d\alpha\int\!\!d^{2}r_{1}\,d^{2}r_{2}\,% \Psi^{*}_{V}(\vec{r}_{2},\alpha)\,G_{Q\bar{Q}}(z^{\prime}\!\!\to\!\infty,\vec{% r}_{2};z,\vec{r}_{1})\,\sigma_{Q\bar{Q}}(r_{1},s)\,\Psi_{\gamma(\gamma^{*})}(% \vec{r}_{1},\alpha)\,.∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d italic_α ∫ italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_Ψ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_α ) italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → ∞ , over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_z , over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_s ) roman_Ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ ( italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_α ) . (3)

Here, ΨV(r,α)subscriptΨ𝑉𝑟𝛼\Psi_{V}(\vec{r},\alpha)roman_Ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG , italic_α ) is the LF wave function for heavy quarkonium, obtained by the Terent’ev boosting prescription [4] and including the correction due to the Melosh spin rotation effect [5], and Ψγ(γ)(r,α)subscriptΨ𝛾superscript𝛾𝑟𝛼\Psi_{\gamma(\gamma^{*})}(\vec{r},\alpha)roman_Ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ ( italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG , italic_α ) is the LF distribution of the QQ¯𝑄¯𝑄Q\bar{Q}italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG Fock component of the quasi-real (transversely polarized) or virtual photon. Variable r𝑟\vec{r}over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG is the transverse separation of the QQ¯𝑄¯𝑄Q\bar{Q}italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG fluctuation (dipole) and α=pQ+/pγ+𝛼superscriptsubscript𝑝𝑄superscriptsubscript𝑝𝛾\alpha=p_{Q}^{+}/p_{\gamma}^{+}italic_α = italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT / italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is the boost-invariant fraction of the photon momentum carried by a heavy quark (or antiquark). The dipole cross section σQQ¯(r,s)subscript𝜎𝑄¯𝑄𝑟𝑠\sigma_{Q\bar{Q}}(r,s)italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_r , italic_s ) in Eq. (3) describes the interaction of the QQ¯𝑄¯𝑄Q\bar{Q}italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG dipole with the nucleon target. The Green function GQQ¯(z,r2;z,r1)subscript𝐺𝑄¯𝑄superscript𝑧subscript𝑟2𝑧subscript𝑟1G_{Q\bar{Q}}(z^{\prime}\to\infty,\vec{r}_{2};z,\vec{r}_{1})italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT → ∞ , over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_z , over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), which describes the evolution of a QQ¯𝑄¯𝑄Q\bar{Q}italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG pair between points r1,zsubscript𝑟1𝑧\vec{r}_{1},zover→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_z and r2,zsubscript𝑟2superscript𝑧\vec{r_{2}},z^{\prime}over→ start_ARG italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG , italic_z start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, satisfies the two-dimensional Schrödinger equation [6]

iddz2GQQ¯(z2,r2;z1,r1)=[η2Δr22kα(1α)+VQQ¯(z2,r2,α)]GQQ¯(z2,r2;z1,r1),𝑖𝑑𝑑subscript𝑧2subscript𝐺𝑄¯𝑄subscript𝑧2subscript𝑟2subscript𝑧1subscript𝑟1delimited-[]superscript𝜂2subscriptΔsubscript𝑟22𝑘𝛼1𝛼subscript𝑉𝑄¯𝑄subscript𝑧2subscript𝑟2𝛼subscript𝐺𝑄¯𝑄subscript𝑧2subscript𝑟2subscript𝑧1subscript𝑟1i\frac{d}{dz_{2}}\,G_{Q\bar{Q}}(z_{2},\vec{r}_{2};z_{1},\vec{r}_{1})=\left[% \frac{\eta^{2}-\Delta_{r_{2}}}{2\,k\,\alpha\,(1-\alpha)}+V_{Q\bar{Q}}(z_{2},% \vec{r}_{2},\alpha)\right]G_{Q\bar{Q}}(z_{2},\vec{r}_{2};z_{1},\vec{r}_{1})\,,italic_i divide start_ARG italic_d end_ARG start_ARG italic_d italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = [ divide start_ARG italic_η start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_k italic_α ( 1 - italic_α ) end_ARG + italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_α ) ] italic_G start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ; italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) , (4)

where η2=mQ2+α(1α)Q2superscript𝜂2superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑄2𝛼1𝛼superscript𝑄2\eta^{2}=m_{Q}^{2}+\alpha(1-\alpha)Q^{2}italic_η start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_α ( 1 - italic_α ) italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, mQsubscript𝑚𝑄m_{Q}italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the heavy quark mass and Laplacian Δr2subscriptΔsubscript𝑟2\Delta_{r_{2}}roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT acts on the coordinate r2subscript𝑟2r_{2}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Important ingredient of the Schrödinger equation is the complex QQ¯𝑄¯𝑄Q\bar{Q}italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG potential in the LF frame, VQQ¯(z2,r2,α)subscript𝑉𝑄¯𝑄subscript𝑧2subscript𝑟2𝛼V_{Q\bar{Q}}(z_{2},\vec{r}_{2},\alpha)italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_z start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_α ). The imaginary part of the LF potential controls the attenuation of the QQ¯𝑄¯𝑄Q\bar{Q}italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG pair in the medium and the corresponding real part describes the interaction between the Q𝑄Qitalic_Q and Q¯¯𝑄\bar{Q}over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG. The values of the real part of the LF potential for arbitrary model of QQ¯𝑄¯𝑄Q-\bar{Q}italic_Q - over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG interaction are obtained numerically, as described in Ref. [3], by solving the LF Schrödinger equation for ΨV(r2,α)subscriptΨ𝑉subscript𝑟2𝛼\Psi_{V}(\vec{r}_{2},\alpha)roman_Ψ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( over→ start_ARG italic_r end_ARG start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_α ).

The kinetic term in Eq. (4) includes the coherence length (CL), lc=1/qLsubscript𝑙𝑐1subscript𝑞𝐿l_{c}=1/q_{L}italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = 1 / italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, with qLsubscript𝑞𝐿q_{L}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT being the longitudinal momentum transfer defined as

qL(z)=MQQ¯2(z)+Q22kη2Δr22kα(1α),subscript𝑞𝐿𝑧superscriptsubscript𝑀𝑄¯𝑄2𝑧superscript𝑄22𝑘superscript𝜂2subscriptΔsubscript𝑟22𝑘𝛼1𝛼q_{L}(z)=\frac{M_{Q\bar{Q}}^{2}(z)+Q^{2}}{2\,k}\Rightarrow\frac{\eta^{2}-% \Delta_{r_{2}}}{2\,k\,\alpha(1-\alpha)}\,,italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_L end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_z ) = divide start_ARG italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_z ) + italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_k end_ARG ⇒ divide start_ARG italic_η start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG 2 italic_k italic_α ( 1 - italic_α ) end_ARG , (5)

where MQQ¯2=(mQ2+qT2)/α(1α)subscriptsuperscript𝑀2𝑄¯𝑄superscriptsubscript𝑚𝑄2superscriptsubscript𝑞𝑇2𝛼1𝛼M^{2}_{Q\bar{Q}}=(m_{Q}^{2}+q_{T}^{2})/\alpha(1-\alpha)italic_M start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = ( italic_m start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ) / italic_α ( 1 - italic_α ) is the QQ¯𝑄¯𝑄Q\bar{Q}italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG effective mass and qT2Δrsuperscriptsubscript𝑞𝑇2subscriptΔ𝑟q_{T}^{2}\Rightarrow-\Delta_{r}italic_q start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⇒ - roman_Δ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_r end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the quark transverse momentum. The condition lcRAsubscript𝑙𝑐subscript𝑅𝐴l_{c}\geq R_{A}italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≥ italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT controls the onset of the quantum coherence effect related to QQ¯𝑄¯𝑄Q\bar{Q}italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG Fock component of the photon and leading to higher twist quark shadowing. Another effect, known as the color transparency (CT), is responsible for the final state absorption of produced quarkonium [2, 3]. The onset of CT is controlled by the transverse size evolution of a QQ¯𝑄¯𝑄Q\bar{Q}italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG pair propagating through the medium and is also incorporated in the Green function formalism.

In the electroproduction of heavy quarkonia at EIC energies, we evaluate the total cross section for quarkonium production on nuclear target as follows,

σγAJ/ψA(s,b)=d2bd2σAcoh(s,b)d2b.subscript𝜎superscript𝛾𝐴𝐽𝜓𝐴𝑠𝑏superscript𝑑2𝑏superscript𝑑2superscriptsubscript𝜎𝐴𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑏superscript𝑑2𝑏\sigma_{\gamma^{*}A\to J\!/\!\psi A}(s,b)=\int d^{2}b~{}~{}\frac{d^{2}\sigma_{% A}^{coh}(s,b)}{d^{2}b}\,.italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A → italic_J / italic_ψ italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_s , italic_b ) = ∫ italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b divide start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c italic_o italic_h end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_s , italic_b ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_d start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_b end_ARG . (6)

Then, we express the nucleus-to-nucleon ratio (nuclear transparency) as

RAcoh(J/ψ)=σγAJ/ψAAσγNJ/ψNsuperscriptsubscript𝑅𝐴𝑐𝑜𝐽𝜓subscript𝜎superscript𝛾𝐴𝐽𝜓𝐴𝐴subscript𝜎superscript𝛾𝑁𝐽𝜓𝑁\displaystyle R_{A}^{coh}(J\!/\!\psi)=\frac{\sigma_{\gamma^{*}A\to J\!/\!\psi A% }}{A~{}\sigma_{\gamma^{*}N\to J\!/\!\psi N}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c italic_o italic_h end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_J / italic_ψ ) = divide start_ARG italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_A → italic_J / italic_ψ italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG start_ARG italic_A italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N → italic_J / italic_ψ italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG (7)

where σγNVNsubscript𝜎superscript𝛾𝑁𝑉𝑁\sigma_{\gamma^{*}N\to VN}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N → italic_V italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the total cross section for J/Ψ𝐽ΨJ/\Psiitalic_J / roman_Ψ production on a nucleon target. More details about the formalism can be found in Ref. [3].

We also include in Eq. (3) a small correction due to the real part of the γNJ/ψNsuperscript𝛾𝑁𝐽𝜓𝑁\gamma^{*}N\to J\!/\!\psi Nitalic_γ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_N → italic_J / italic_ψ italic_N amplitude by performing the following replacement [7, 8, 9],

σQQ¯(r,s)σQQ¯(r,s)(1iπ2Λ),Λ=lnσQQ¯(r,s)lns.formulae-sequencesubscript𝜎𝑄¯𝑄𝑟𝑠subscript𝜎𝑄¯𝑄𝑟𝑠1𝑖𝜋2ΛΛsubscript𝜎𝑄¯𝑄𝑟𝑠𝑠\sigma_{Q\bar{Q}}(r,s)\Rightarrow\sigma_{Q\bar{Q}}(r,s)\,\left(1-i\,\frac{\pi}% {2}\,\Lambda\right),\qquad\qquad\Lambda=\frac{\partial\,\ln\,{\sigma_{Q\bar{Q}% }(r,s)}}{\partial\,\ln s}\,.italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_r , italic_s ) ⇒ italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_r , italic_s ) ( 1 - italic_i divide start_ARG italic_π end_ARG start_ARG 2 end_ARG roman_Λ ) , roman_Λ = divide start_ARG ∂ roman_ln italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_r , italic_s ) end_ARG start_ARG ∂ roman_ln italic_s end_ARG . (8)

Another phenomenon that affects heavy quarkonium production in photo-nuclear reactions in UPC is gluon shadowing. The effect of GS has to be additionally included as a shadowing correction corresponding to higher Fock components of the photon containing gluons. It was incorporated as a reduction of σQQ¯(r,s)subscript𝜎𝑄¯𝑄𝑟𝑠\sigma_{Q\bar{Q}}(r,s)italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_r , italic_s ) in nuclear reactions with respect to processes on the nucleon [14],

σQQ¯(r,x)σQQ¯(r,x)RG(x,b).subscript𝜎𝑄¯𝑄𝑟𝑥subscript𝜎𝑄¯𝑄𝑟𝑥subscript𝑅𝐺𝑥𝑏\sigma_{Q\bar{Q}}(r,x)\Rightarrow\sigma_{Q\bar{Q}}(r,x)\cdot R_{G}(x,b)\,.italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_r , italic_x ) ⇒ italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_r , italic_x ) ⋅ italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_G end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x , italic_b ) . (9)

The correction factor RG(x,b)subscript𝑅𝐺𝑥𝑏R_{G}(x,b)italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_G end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_x , italic_b ) was calculated within the Green function formalism as a function of the nuclear impact parameter b𝑏bitalic_b and the Bjorken variable x𝑥xitalic_x.

3 Results

We calculated the coherent charmonium photoproduction in UPC at LHC energies according to Eq. (1), as well as the electroproduction at EIC energies using Eqs. (6) and (7).

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 1: Rapidity distributions of coherent cross section for photoproduction of J/ψ𝐽𝜓J/\psiitalic_J / italic_ψ (left) and ψsuperscript𝜓\psi^{\prime}italic_ψ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (right) in UPC at LHC energies sN=5.02TeVsubscript𝑠𝑁5.02TeV\sqrt{s_{N}}=5.02\,\,\mbox{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV (top panel) and 5.5 TeV (bottom panel). The data for dσ/dy𝑑𝜎𝑑𝑦d\sigma/dyitalic_d italic_σ / italic_d italic_y from ALICE [10], LHCb [11, 12] and CMS [13] Collaborations are shown for comparison. Figure is adopted from Ref. [3].

In Figure 1, top panels, we present comparison of our model predictions for the rapidity distributions dσ/dy𝑑𝜎𝑑𝑦d\sigma/dyitalic_d italic_σ / italic_d italic_y of coherent J/ψ(1S)𝐽𝜓1𝑆J\!/\!\psi(1S)italic_J / italic_ψ ( 1 italic_S ) (left panel) and ψ(2S)superscript𝜓2𝑆\psi^{\,\prime}(2S)italic_ψ start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ′ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( 2 italic_S ) (right panel) photoproduction in UPC at c.m. collision energy sN=5.02TeVsubscript𝑠𝑁5.02TeV\sqrt{s_{N}}=5.02\,\,\mbox{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.02 TeV with available data. Our results were obtained for charmonium wave functions generated by two c𝑐citalic_c-c¯¯𝑐\bar{c}over¯ start_ARG italic_c end_ARG potential models, POW [15, 16] (dotted and dot-dashed lines) and BT [17] (solid and dashed lines). For the dipole cross sections σQQ¯subscript𝜎𝑄¯𝑄\sigma_{Q\bar{Q}}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT we employed the GBW [18] (solid and dot-dashed lines) and KST [2] (dashed and dotted lines) parametrizations. Our predictions based on the Green function formalism manifest a rather good agreement with data. Bottom panels of Figure 1 show the prediction for rapidity distributions of coherent charmonium cross section at larger sN=5.5TeVsubscript𝑠𝑁5.5TeV\sqrt{s_{N}}=5.5\,\,\mbox{TeV}square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 5.5 TeV, which is planned to be measured at the LHC. Here, solid lines represent calculations within a rigorous path integral technique. The dotted lines are based on the Eikonal approximation (lcRAmuch-greater-thansubscript𝑙𝑐subscript𝑅𝐴l_{c}\gg R_{A}italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≫ italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in Eq. (3)) for production cross section and without GS corrections. The difference between solid and dotted lines at midrapidities illustrates the net GS effect. At forward/backward rapidities, the GS vanishes and the difference between the two lines is caused by the reduced effects of quantum coherence when lc <RA <subscript𝑙𝑐subscript𝑅𝐴l_{c}\mathrel{\hbox to0.0pt{\lower 4.0pt\hbox{\hskip 1.0pt$\sim$}\hss}\raise 1% .0pt\hbox{$<$}}R_{A}italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼< italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Ratio RAcohsuperscriptsubscript𝑅𝐴𝑐𝑜R_{A}^{coh}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c italic_o italic_h end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT for J/ψ𝐽𝜓J/\psiitalic_J / italic_ψ coherent production on the gold target as a function of c.m. energy W𝑊Witalic_W at several fixed values of photon virtuality Q2=0superscript𝑄20Q^{2}=0italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT = 0, 5, 20 and 50 GeV2 (left panel). Right panel shows the ratio RAcohsuperscriptsubscript𝑅𝐴𝑐𝑜R_{A}^{coh}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c italic_o italic_h end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT as a function of Q2+MJ/Ψ2superscript𝑄2superscriptsubscript𝑀𝐽Ψ2Q^{2}+M_{J/\Psi}^{2}italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J / roman_Ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT at several fixed values of W=20𝑊20W=20italic_W = 20, 30, 50, 100 and 200  GeV. Figure is adopted from Ref. [3].

In Figure 2, we present the ratio RAcohsuperscriptsubscript𝑅𝐴cohR_{A}^{\rm coh}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_coh end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT from Eq. (7) as a function of the c.m. energy W𝑊Witalic_W (left panel) and as a function of Q2+MJ/Ψ2superscript𝑄2superscriptsubscript𝑀𝐽Ψ2Q^{2}+M_{J/\Psi}^{2}italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J / roman_Ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT (right panel) for electroproduction of J/ψ(1S)𝐽𝜓1𝑆J\!/\!\psi(1S)italic_J / italic_ψ ( 1 italic_S ) on a gold target. The values of RAcohsuperscriptsubscript𝑅𝐴𝑐𝑜R_{A}^{coh}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_c italic_o italic_h end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT were obtained using the charmonium LF wave function generated by the POW c𝑐citalic_c-c¯¯𝑐\bar{c}over¯ start_ARG italic_c end_ARG interaction potential and the GBW model for σQQ¯subscript𝜎𝑄¯𝑄\sigma_{Q\bar{Q}}italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_Q over¯ start_ARG italic_Q end_ARG end_POSTSUBSCRIPT fitted to data for photon virtualities Q250superscript𝑄250Q^{2}\leq 50italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≤ 50 GeV2 [18]. In the left panel of Figure 2, our results show significant leading twist corrections, rising with the photon energy, as differences between solid (the Green function formalism with GS) and dashed (Eikonal approximation without GS) lines at large W𝑊Witalic_W. At small photon energies, up to the position of maximal RAcohsuperscriptsubscript𝑅𝐴cohR_{A}^{\rm coh}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_coh end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT values, the difference is caused by the effect of reduced coherence length, as lc <RA <subscript𝑙𝑐subscript𝑅𝐴l_{c}\mathrel{\hbox to0.0pt{\lower 4.0pt\hbox{\hskip 1.0pt$\sim$}\hss}\raise 1% .0pt\hbox{$<$}}R_{A}italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∼< italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Right panel of Figure 2 represents the Q2+MJ/Ψ2superscript𝑄2superscriptsubscript𝑀𝐽Ψ2Q^{2}+M_{J/\Psi}^{2}italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + italic_M start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_J / roman_Ψ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-behavior of RAcohsuperscriptsubscript𝑅𝐴cohR_{A}^{\rm coh}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_coh end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT at different values of photon energy W𝑊Witalic_W. At large W=100𝑊100W=100italic_W = 100 and 200200200200 GeV, CL is long enough, lc>RAsubscript𝑙𝑐subscript𝑅𝐴l_{c}>R_{A}italic_l start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_c end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, to neglect its variation with Q2superscript𝑄2Q^{2}italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and the rise of RAcohsuperscriptsubscript𝑅𝐴cohR_{A}^{\rm coh}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_coh end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with Q2superscript𝑄2Q^{2}italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT is a net manifestation of CT. The effect of reduced CL is visible at lower energies, W<50𝑊50W<50italic_W < 50 GeV, as decrease of RAcohsuperscriptsubscript𝑅𝐴cohR_{A}^{\rm coh}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_A end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT roman_coh end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT with Q2superscript𝑄2Q^{2}italic_Q start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

Our predictions for the onset of reduced coherence effects and gluon shadowing can be tested by future experiments at EIC. The proper treatment of the shadowing and absorption effects in the nuclear medium within a rigorous path integral technique may be crucial for the future conclusive evidence of expected gluon saturation effects at large energies.

Acknowledgments

The work of J.N. was partially supported by the Slovak Funding Agency, Grant No. 2/0020/22. Computational resources were provided by the e-INFRA CZ project (ID:90254), supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic.

References

  • [1] C. A. Bertulani, S. R. Klein and J. Nystrand, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 55 (2005) 271.
  • [2] B. Kopeliovich, J. Nemchik, A. Schafer and A. Tarasov, Phys. Rev. C 65 (2002) 035201.
  • [3] J. Nemchik and J. Obertova, Phys. Rev. D 110 (2024) 054015.
  • [4] M.V. Terentev, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 24 (1976) 106. [Yad. Fiz. 24 (1976) 207].
  • [5] H.J. Melosh, Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 1095.
  • [6] B.Z. Kopeliovich, A. Schafer and A.V. Tarasov, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 054022.
  • [7] J. B. Bronzan, G. L. Kane and U. P. Sukhatme, Phys. Lett. B 49 (1974) 272.
  • [8] J. Nemchik, N. N. Nikolaev, E. Predazzi and B. Zakharov, Z. Phys. C 75 (1997) 71.
  • [9] J. R. Forshaw, R. Sandapen and G. Shaw, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 094013.
  • [10] S. Acharya et al. [ALICE], Phys. Lett. B 798 (2019) 134926; Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 712.
  • [11] A. Bursche [LHCb], Nucl. Phys. A 982 (2019) 247.
  • [12] R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], JHEP 06 (2023) 146.
  • [13] A. Tumasyan et al. [CMS], Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 262301.
  • [14] B. Kopeliovich, A. Tarasov and J. Hufner, Nucl. Phys. A 696 (2001) 669.
  • [15] A. Martin, Phys. Lett. B 93 (1980) 338.
  • [16] N. Barik and S.N. Jena, Phys. Lett. B 97 (1980) 265.
  • [17] W. Buchmuller and S.H.H. Tye, Phys. Rev. D 24 (1981) 132.
  • [18] K. Golec-Biernat and S. Sapeta, JHEP 03 (2018) 102.