Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Computer Science > Software Engineering

arXiv:2209.07211 (cs)
[Submitted on 15 Sep 2022 (v1), last revised 16 Sep 2022 (this version, v2)]

Title:On the acceptance by code reviewers of candidate security patches suggested by Automated Program Repair tools

Authors:Aurora Papotti, Ranindya Paramitha, Fabio Massacci
View PDF
Abstract:Background: Testing and validation of the semantic correctness of patches provided by tools for Automated Program Repairs (APR) has received a lot of attention. Yet, the eventual acceptance or rejection of suggested patches for real world projects by humans patch reviewers has received a limited attention. Objective: To address this issue, we plan to investigate whether (possibly incorrect) security patches suggested by APR tools are recognized by human reviewers. We also want to investigate whether knowing that a patch was produced by an allegedly specialized tool does change the decision of human reviewers. Method: In the first phase, using a balanced design, we propose to human reviewers a combination of patches proposed by APR tools for different vulnerabilities and ask reviewers to adopt or reject the proposed patches. In the second phase, we tell participants that some of the proposed patches were generated by security specialized tools (even if the tool was actually a `normal' APR tool) and measure whether the human reviewers would change their decision to adopt or reject a patch. Limitations: The experiment will be conducted in an academic setting, and to maintain power, it will focus on a limited sample of popular APR tools and popular vulnerability types.
Subjects: Software Engineering (cs.SE)
Cite as: arXiv:2209.07211 [cs.SE]
  (or arXiv:2209.07211v2 [cs.SE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.07211

Submission history

From: Aurora Papotti [view email]
[v1] Thu, 15 Sep 2022 10:56:27 UTC (6,013 KB)
[v2] Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:11:21 UTC (6,013 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
cs.SE
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2022-09
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)