Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Xen 4.16.1 #12

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Xen 4.16.1 #12

wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

Insei
Copy link
Owner

@Insei Insei commented Sep 29, 2022

No description provided.

Insei and others added 11 commits December 2, 2022 11:28
…70 tpm module

* some boards like uno-220 has a non-standard address for slb9670 tpm module, we must separate node for spi and slb9670 tpm module, for adding ability to configure slb9670 tpm node for other boards that bases on rpi4.

Signed-off-by: Aleksandrov Dmitriy <[email protected]>
…20 based on our changes for rpi4

Signed-off-by: Aleksandrov Dmitriy <[email protected]>
There are cases where for the given VF cloud want to send adapter
assignment before it got back results with PCI address of the device
during the onboard. For that particular case we can determine PCI
address of the given virtual function (VF) using mneumonic in its own
name. VF is named following this rule {VF id}vf{PF IFace} so from that
we can determing Physical Function (PF) to which this VF is belonging to
and VF id. And using that information we can find VF PCI address by
resolving following link

/sys/class/net/{PF IFace}/device/vf{VF id}

Signed-off-by: Pavel Abramov <[email protected]>
It is confusing to allow specifying "uplink" or "freeuplink" for the
port for a switch network instance since it will pick an arbitrary port
and there is no check whether the port is up and usable (the probe logic
assumes we have a local IP address to do the probes hence is not and can
not be used on a switch network instance).

While we could block using the labels "uplink" and "freeuplink" that
might cause unneeded errors/failures for configurations where there is
only one uplink aka management port. So instead we check how many ports
are returned when we get the list and reject if > 1.

Signed-off-by: eriknordmark <[email protected]>
We must adjust installer mount to work with moved pillar's data.

Signed-off-by: Petr Fedchenkov <[email protected]>
hyper.GetCapabilities() may return errors while booting or under load,
we must not assume it as a fatal error. Also as accessing xl is quite
wasteful we should concentrate call in one place and publish information
 across subscribers.

Signed-off-by: Petr Fedchenkov <[email protected]>
We may have non-annotated tags which is basically a tag without
dedicated message.
Let's support them as well to avoid confusion in CI.

Signed-off-by: Petr Fedchenkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aleksandrov Dmitriy <[email protected]>
Insei and others added 2 commits December 5, 2022 14:28
Signed-off-by: Aleksandrov Dmitriy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Petr Fedchenkov <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants