Nestle (Strategy Project) Slides
Nestle (Strategy Project) Slides
Nestle (Strategy Project) Slides
Pakistan)
An Overview of Project
Internal:
External:
Analysis
SPACE
BCG
IE matrix
Grand Strategy Matrix
QSPM
History of
Nestle
History
1866-1905
In the 1860s Henri Nestl, a pharmacist, developed a food for babies who were
unable to breastfeed. His first success was a premature infant who could not
tolerate his mother's milk or any of the usual substitutes. sold in much of Europe.
1905-1918
In 1905 Nestl merged with the Anglo-Swiss Condensed Milk Company. By the early
1900s, the company was operating factories in the United States, Britain, Germany
and Spain.
1918-1938
After the war Government contracts dried up and consumers switched back to fresh
milk. However, Nestl's management responded quickly, streamlining operations and
reducing debt. The 1920s saw Nestl's first expansion into new products, with
chocolate the Company's second most important activity
1938-1944
Nestl felt the effects of World War II immediately. Profits dropped from $20 million in
1938 to $6 million in 1939. Factories were established in developing countries,
particularly Latin America. Ironically, the war helped with the introduction of the
Company's newest product, Nescaf, which was a staple drink of the US military.
Nestl's production and sales rose in the wartime economy.
1944-1981
Nestl's growth in the developing world partially offset a slowdown in the Company's
traditional markets. Nestl made its second venture outside the food industry by
acquiring Alcon Laboratories Inc..
1981-1995
Nestl divested a number of businesses1980 / 1984. In 1984, Nestl's improved
bottom line allowed the Company to launch a new round of acquisitions, the most
important being American food giant Carnation.
1996-2002
The first half of the 1990s proved to be favorable for Nestl: trade barriers crumbled
and world markets developed into more or less integrated trading areas. Since 1996
there have been acquisitions including San Pellegrino (1997), Spillers Petfoods
(1998) and Ralston Purina (2002). There were two major acquisitions in North
America, both in 2002: in July, Nestl merged its U.S. ice cream business into
Dreyer's, and in August, a USD 2.6bn acquisition was announced of Chef America,
Inc.
2003 +
The year 2003 started well with the acquisition ofMvenpick Ice Cream,
enhancingNestl's position as one of the world market leaders in this product
category. In 2006, Jenny Craig and Uncle Toby's were added to the Nestl portfolio
and 2007 sawNovartis Medical Nutrition, Gerber and Henniez join the Company.
Company Introduction
OUR
BRANDS
Our Brands
We believe that food plays a key role in achieving a well-balanced person. And
so our philosophy is Good Food for a Good Life!
At Nestl, our products are developed keeping our consumers, their
preferences and health in mind.
Millions of consumers the world over trust Nestl products for good reason:
when they choose a Nestl product they have the satisfaction of choosing
quality, taste, variety, convenience and the good nutrition.
Brand Names
Vision
Mission Statement
Meet the nutrition needs of consumers of all ages from infancy to old
age, from nutrition to pleasure, through an innovative portfolio of branded
food and beverage products of the highest quality.
Mission Statement(Proposed)
Components of Mission
Statement
1. Customers
Yes
2. Products or services
Yes
3. Markets
Yes
4. Technology
Yes
Yes
6. Philosophy
Yes
7. Self-concept
Yes
Yes
Yes
Weightage
Rates
WS
Strengths:
1 Highly Diversified Company
0.07
0.28
2 Customer Loyalty
0.02
0.08
0.06
0.24
0.06
0.24
0.1
0.4
0.09
0.36
7 Brand Image
0.09
0.36
0.02
0.06
0.07
0.28
0.05
0.2
1 Narrow Market
0.01
0.02
0.12
0.06
0.01
0.02
4 Distribution Costs
0.08
0.08
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.06
0.04
0.08
8 Preferability of products
9 Packaging of Products
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.06
5 Market Share
10 Management
Weaknesses:
3.09
Weightage
Rates
WS
Opportunities:
1 High Trend for E-Commerce
0.02
0.06
0.05
0.2
0.06
0.24
0.05
0.1
0.07
0.28
0.05
0.1
0.08
0.24
0.05
0.2
0.04
0.12
0.03
0.09
0.03
0.12
0.05
0.2
0.05
0.1
4 Devaluation of money
0.03
0.06
0.08
0.16
0.05
0.1
0.02
0.08
0.1
0.3
0.08
0.16
0.01
0.04
2.95
Threats:
8 Entry Barrier
9 Higher Inflation
10 Private labeling
Total
CPM
Critical Success
Factors
Weig
ht
Engro Foods
Shakarganj
Rate
Score
Rate
Score
Rate
Scor
e
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.1
Quality Standard
0.15
0.6
0.45
0.3
Profit Margin
0.05
0.2
0.15
0.1
Costs of Production
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Growth Potential
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.05
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.2
Human Resource
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.3
Advertisement
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.2
Technology
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.05
0.2
0.1
0.05
3.5
3.05
2.05
Market Share
Corporate
Environment
Research &
Development
Total
2015
2014
Engro (Olpers)
49,834,000
43,027,377
Shakarganj
(Goodmilk)
6,578,986
11,356,340
Nestle Milkpak
81,686,079
77,432,902
Total
138,099,065
RMS
131,816,61
9
81686079/81686079
IG
(138099065-131816619)/131816619x100
5%
2015
2014
Sheezan
6,817,635
6,760,527
Coka Cola
11,073,500
9,199,600
Nestle
20,729,151
18,251,270
Total
38,620,286
34,211,397
RMS
20729151/20729151
13%
IG
(3862028634211397)/34211397x100
2015
Mitchels
Nestle
Total
2014
661,569
486,282
570,686
773,571
1,232,255
1,259,853
Other
(Confectionary)
RMS
570686/661569
0.86
IG
(1232255-1259853)/1259853x100
-2%
BCG Matrix
Products
Milk & Nutrition
Beverages
Others
(Confectionery)
Stars
RMS
1
1
IG
5%
13%
Revenues
81,686,079
20,729,151
0.86
-2%
570,686
Question Marks
BCG Matrix
15%
10%
5%
RMS
1.2
0.8
0.6
0%
0.4
0.2
-5%
-10%
Cash
Cows
-15%
Industry Growth
Dogs
SPACE MATRIX
Financial Position
Liquidity (Current ratio): +6
Return on Investment (ROA & ROE): +5
Leverage (Debt to Equity Ratio): +4
Profitability (Earnings Per Share): +6
Efficiency (Inventory Turnover): +5
FP = +26/5 = +5.2
Economic Position:
Inflation: -5
Gov. Policies (Taxation): -4
Demand Variability: -1
Price Elasticity of Demand: -4
Risk Factor: -4
EP = -18/5 = -3.6
Industry Position:
Growth Potential: +6
Capacity utilization: +5
Profit Potential: +6
Ease of Entry in Industry: +4
Financial Stability: +4
I.P = +25/5 = +5
Competitive Position:
Market Share: -1
Product Life Cycle: -2
Customer loyalty: -3
Product Quality: -4
Technology: -2
CP= 12/5 = -2.4
Y-axis
FP = +5.2
IP = +5.0
EP = -3.6
CP = -2.4
Total = +1.6
Total = +2.6
Conservativ
e
F
P
Space Matrix
6
Aggressive
IP
CP
-6
-4
-2
-2
Defensiv
e
Competitiv
-4e
-6
SP/EP
I/E Matrix
IE Matrix for Milk Division
EFE
Opportunities
Key Factors
1
Threats
Weightage
Rates
WS
0.15
0.6
0.09
0.36
0.1
0.4
0.15
0.6
0.12
0.48
0.12
0.09
0.18
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.06
0.18
3.62
0.12
0.48
2 Strong Management
0.09
0.36
0.14
0.56
0.1
0.4
0.11
0.44
0.04
0.15
0.15
0.08
0.16
3 Affordability of costumers
0.07
0.14
0.05
0.1
0.09
0.18
TOTAL
2.97
I/E Matrix
IE Matrix for Beverages Division
EFE
Opportunities
Key Factors
1
Threats
1
2
3
4
Weaknesses
IFE
Weightage
1 Private labeling
2 Market growth is attracting new competitors
3 Inflation is affecting consumers purchasing power
4 Increased Govt. oversight and regulations
5 Increasing cost of plant
TOTAL
Strengths
Rates
WS
0.12
0.48
0.07
0.08
0.11
0.15
3
3
3
4
0.21
0.24
0.33
0.6
0.08
0.11
0.12
0.09
0.07
1
0.13
0.15
0.12
0.1
0.14
3
4
4
2
2
0.24
0.44
0.48
0.18
0.14
3.34
4
4
3
4
0.52
0.6
0.36
0.4
0.56
0.05
0.06
0.1
0.08
2
1
2
2
0.1
0.06
0.2
0.16
0.07
1
0.14
3.1
I/E Matrix
IE Matrix for Other Division (Confectionery)
EFE
Key Factors
Weightage
Rates
WS
Opportunities
1
2
0.06
0.12
0.12
0.36
0.08
0.24
0.1
0.4
0.15
0.1
0.15
0.3
0.08
0.16
0.06
0.12
0.1
TOTAL
Strengths
0.3
2.55
1 Strong Management
0.15
0.6
0.12
0.48
3 Diversified Workforce
0.09
0.27
0.12
0.36
0.12
0.48
0.1
0.1
0.14
0.14
0.07
0.14
0.12
0.24
0.15
0.1
IFE
Weaknesses
0.45
0.15
2.96
I/E Matrix
Divisions
Milk & Nutritions
Beverages
Other (Confectionery)
2015
Total Sales
2014
177,951,606
167,287,869
Industry Growth
6.37%
Competitive Position
-2.40
Quardrant-I
QuardrantIII
QuardrantIV
IFE
Forward Integration
(Opening Retail
Outlets)
AS
Sr. No.
Product Development
(Lassi & Icecream)
TAS
AS
TAS
AS
TAS
Weightage
Strengths:
0.07
0.14
0.21
0.28
2 Customer Loyalty
0.02
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.06
0.12
0.18
0.24
0.12
0.06
0.06
0.18
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.09
0.18
0.36
0.09
7 Brand Image
0.09
0.36
0.27
0.18
5 Market Share
0.02
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.07
0.28
0.14
0.07
0.05
0.1
Weaknesses:
0.15
0.2
1 Narrow Market
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.04
0.06
0.01
0.24
0.18
0.12
0.01
0.04
0.03
4 Distribution Costs
0.08
0.32
0.16
0.24
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-0.09
0.04
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.12
0.06
0.04
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.03
0.12
0.06
0.03
2.45
2.29
1.87
QSPM (Continued)
Opportunities:
0.02
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
10
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.08
0.04
0.02
0.2
0.24
0.1
0.15
0.18
0.12
0.15
0.05
0.2
0.28
0.14
0.21
0.2
0.1
0.15
0.24
0.16
0.08
0.15
0.05
0.1
0.08
0.16
0.04
0.12
Threats:
1 Increased interest in Restaurant Meals
2 Suspicion of Prepacked Foods
3 Increased Govt. Oversight & Regulations
4 Devaluation of money
5 Uncertainty of economic conditions
6 Global Economic crises
7 Competition with Smuggled brands
8 Entry Barrier
9 Higher Inflation
10 Private labeling
Total
Grand Total
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.03
0.08
0.05
0.02
0.06
0.03
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.08
0.04
0.02
0.1
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.08
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.01
0.02
1.14
0.04
1.86
4.31
0.03
1.11
3.4
3.01
Decision
Our Recommendation:
Considering this fact now we recommended Nestle Pakistan
should go for Forward Integration by the way of Opening
Retail Outlets to meet the market trend i.e. people now prefer
to buy from retail outlets rather than traditional shopkeepers.
This can retail the loyalty of our customers as well as there will
be chances to gain more customers for our products.
Evaluations
Thank You