Intercultural Dialogue4 PDF

R062_ Intercultural Dialogue
2/10/04
This collection of essays is one of ten celebrating

the British Councils 70th anniversary by examining
some of the most critical issues for the future of
cultural relations. A wide range of thinkers
provides provocative and stimulating visions of
the power and importance of cultural relations in
the 21st century. They dont look for agreement;
their aim, and ours, is to encourage debate and
cut new channels for dialogue.
What does this well-used phrase actually mean?

Is cultural dialogue a mandarin business of
intellectual comparison and synthesis; a
structured and primarily intellectual conversation
that examines the mechanics of interaction
between high cultures? Or is it the business of
retail interaction in a world where individuals
at all levels of society, articulate and inarticulate,
educated and uneducated, pious and secular, are
thrown together more and more? Or both?
5.00
3:08 am
Page i
Counterpoint
The cultural relations think tank
of the British Council
[email protected]
www.counterpoint-online.org
Intercultural dialogue
Birthday Counterpoints
Mary Louise Pratt, Ron G. Manley, Susan Bassnett
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page iii
British Council 70th anniversary

essays on cultural relations
Series editor
Rosemary Bechler
Cultural diversity
Jean-Michel Baer, Arjo Klamer,
David Throsby, Issiaka-Prosper Laly
Introduction by Fiona Bartels-Ellis
With an introduction by
Nick Wadham-Smith
Growing a bigger Europe

Corina Suteu, Murat Belge, Poppy Szaybo
Introduction by Stephen Kinnock
Mary Louise Pratt, Ron G. Manley,
Susan Bassnett
Introduction by Nick Wadham-Smith
Re-imagining security
Alastair Crooke, Beverley Milton-Edwards,
Mary Kaldor, Paul Vallely
Introduction by James Kennedy
Faith and secularism

Valrie Amiraux, Heba Raouf Ezzat,
Ahmed Mohammed Abdalla,
Richard Holloway
Introduction by Anshuman Mondal
What is British?
Ziauddin Sardar, Piaras Mac inr,
Zrinka Bralo
Introduction by Csilla Hs
Trust me, Im a scientist

Pervez Hoodbhoy, Daniel Glaser,
Steven Shapin
Introduction by Lloyd Anderson
Identities on the move

John Eade, Dyab Abou Jahjah,
Saskia Sassen
Introduction by Martin Rose
Do human rights travel?

Helena Kennedy, Massoud Shadjareh,
Heiner Bielefeldt, Christine Loh
Introduction by Saad Halawani
What would you die for?
Roger Scruton, Ken Worpole,
Ghassan Hage
Introduction by Chris Rawlings
Series editor
Rosemary Bechler
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page v
Contents
First published 2004

British Council
10 Spring Gardens
London SW1A 2BN
www.britishcouncil.org
All rights reserved
ISBN 0-86355-537-3
Preface
by the Director-General, Sir David Green
Introduction
Nick Wadham-Smith
Planetarity*
Mary Louise Pratt
10
Building an International organisation

Ron G. Manley
32
Intercultural dialogue in a
multilingual world
Susan Bassnett
48
Contributors
62
British Council 2004 Design Department/R062/XXX

The United Kingdoms international organisation for educational opportunities
and cultural relations. We are registered in England as a charity.
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 2
Preface
by the Director-General
The British Council seeks to build long-term relationships between
fed up with hearing us talk. What it wants is for us to shut up and
people of different cultures. Our currency is trust. The British Council
listen. Listening and demonstrating our commitment to the free and
has been a leader in cultural relations since its founding in 1934.
creative interplay of ideas is an indispensable pre-condition for
In order to celebrate our 70th anniversary, I asked Counterpoint, our
building trust.
think tank on cultural relations, to commission a series of ten sets
To build trust we must engage in effective, open dialogue.
of essays, each set looking at a central issue from a variety of angles
Increased mutual understanding based on trust, whether we agree
and viewpoints. The issues range from European enlargement to
or disagree, is a precious outcome.
Britishness, and from the significance of death to the role of faith

and the nature of secularism.
The 34 writers come from all over the world, though at least one
in each set is British. Each introduction, with one exception, is written
by a member of British Council staff. They testify to the richness of the
intellectual and moral resource that the British Council represents.
David Green KCMG
Our intention is to stimulate debate rather than arrive at

consensus. Some essays are controversial. None of them expresses,
individually, a British Council viewpoint. They are the work of
individual authors of distinction from whom we have sought views.
But collectively, they represent something more than the sum of
their parts a commitment to the belief that dialogue is the essential
heart of cultural relations.
Dialogue requires and generates trust. The biggest danger
in what is often called public diplomacy work is that we simply
broadcast views, policies, values and positions. A senior European
diplomat recently said at a British Council conference: The world is
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 4
Introduction
Nick Wadham-Smith
challenge and determines the appropriate solution. With OPCW, it

was a deliberate cultural strategy to bring a multinational mix of 220
inspectors and 500 technical personnel together in The Hague:
The key to the creation of a successful international
organisation was to recruit staff with the ability to work and
function well in a multinational and multicultural environment.
Among weapons of mass destruction, chemical weapons occupy a

special place: specifically they target people, leaving the physical
Manley relates how candidates were found and selected,
infrastructure of their societies mainly intact. Their victims, who are
observing in passing how the application form was interpreted and
killed in large numbers, are lucky if they die quickly. Buildings, railways,
completed in different cultures. We glimpse individuals, plucked
hospitals and homes remain standing to be resettled or left empty.
from their positions within existing hierarchies, operating in the
These weapons are profoundly anti-human: the weapon of choice for
altogether flatter terrain of the new context. Vital training needs
those who would destroy cultures when they fail to understand them.
arose: the analytical chemists, for example, were provided with
The essays in this volume by two distinguished thinkers about
extensive training in the collection and analysis of samples in the
language and communication across cultures, Susan Bassnett and
field and the procedures necessary to ensure their integrity and
Mary Louise Pratt, set out to trace the outlines of a new humanism
accurate analysis (how many dramatic dilemmas lie behind this
by drawing on the potential of a gradually emerging global order.
calm description!). Member states saw to the policy but it was up to
Given their reflections on the planetary dimension of what it is to be
the Secretariat to put it into practice and solve the ensuing
human, it is doubly appropriate that Ron Manley joins them to tell us
problems. Twelve nationalities around a table would produce at
how the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons
least 13 solutions. Consensus was reached by metaphorically
(OPCW) was set up. A fascinating story of how a multinational
locking everyone in until they agreed. As well as the different
secretariat and inspectorate were recruited and unified into a force
cultures of the nations involved, there were different parts of the
to monitor and control those most inhuman of weapons, it both
organisational culture, the Secretariat vs the Inspectorate, to
illuminates and is illuminated by the writings of his two companions.
contend with.
The building of OPCW was so unusual from an organisational
Perhaps it is the issue of language that provides the strongest
point of view because it required the bringing together of a large
link with the other arguments in this volume about globalisation.
team of 68 nationalities for a single professional purpose. This is
English was the lingua franca of the organisation, but the huge bank
where intercultural specialists start to get interested. Most
of primary languages spoken became an essential resource for
conventional studies of communication problems deal with relatively
translation and cultural interpretation: a speaker of Russian was also
accidental interactions of cultures as when the headquarters staff
an instant guide for his colleagues to the cultures of Russia. English
of a multinational company encounter its local employees and
may be in a dominant global position but those who use it are not
customers in an overseas context. Business generates the initial
necessarily the target of a neo-imperialist marketing campaign for
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 6
the cultures of Britain, the USA and Australasia. As Susan Bassnett

points out, second language speakers are especially privileged:
And for Mary Louise Pratt, it is impossible to think seriously about

intercultural dialogue without coming to grips with the linguistic
dimensions of todays planetary social, ecological, economic, political
Those who have learned English in addition to their own
and imaginary realignments. Language not only mediates these
language or languages are able to acquire an understanding
changes but also the way in which we think about them.
of the difficulties of communicating across cultures that is not

possible for monolingual speakers.
For Pratt, the rapidly accelerating movement of peoples is

creating not a world without history, but the proliferating intersection
of histories. Taking two fascinating examples of intercultural
English may be a lingua franca but, as the foreign language
dialogue, one from a classroom in eastern Europe, the other from a
educationalist Michael Byram has often observed, it does not have a
street corner in Manhattan, she unpicks the complexities of
cultura franca. English has many centres: in addition to British
intercultural exchange and expands her celebrated concept of the
English, dictionaries of other Englishes now fill the shelf: Australian,
Contact Zone between cultures (social spaces where cultures meet,
Canadian, Caribbean, Hiberno-, Indian, Jamaican, Liberian, Malaysian,
clash, and grapple with each other, often in contexts of highly
New Zealand, Philippine, Scottish, Singapore and South African.
asymmetrical relations of power, such as colonialism, slavery, or their
English is now spoken more by second language users than by first,
aftermaths). Her analysis culminates in a very impressive move to
its obliging malleability at the service of communicators both within
rehabilitate humanism in the service of a new planetary political
and between cultures.
order. This involves restoring a universal dimension to humanism,
In all discussions about intercultural communication, issues
which avoids charges of being merely occidental, and which can be
of universalism loom large: this is so for both Pratt and Bassnett.
confident in the face of difference. We might characterise this in
Bassnett sees language learning as fundamental to a critique of
philosophical terms as an attempt to replace an essential humanism,
universalist reductionism:
one which pre-exists as a conceptual system in the mind, by showing

how it actually depends on a contingent universalism in this case, a
Knowledge of more than one language soon exposes the
global critical mass of similar beliefs about what constitutes humanity.
fallacy of universal claims. Of course the human body suffers
She urges us to oppose the doctrine many Westerners have
pain, hunger, joy and grief everywhere in the world, but how
installed in their heads: the human was invented by humanism.
those emotions manifest themselves, how they are internalised
themes and resonates very powerfully for all those working in
are communicating perfectly because other people speak a
cultural relations, let me single out one argument with which Pratt
version of English is dangerous, because it is premised on an
meets the multicultural objections to a universal humanism.
assumption of sameness between cultures that is patently false.
In order to show how it connects with Susan Bassnetts main
and then narrated is not universal . . . simply assuming that we
Many object to the project of humanism because it excludes
Knowledge of different languages is a first step, because then
certain identity groups who are considered on a liberal calculus to
we can begin to grasp the immense differences between
be oppositional on some scale, moving from, say, indigenous
cultures, and start to explore ways of building bridges.
peoples on one side to insurgent through freedom fighter to
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 8
terrorist. Pratt argues that identity groups, take form as such after
intervention of organisations such as the British Council and, as Mary
long and persistent efforts to achieve inclusion and access, especially
Louise Pratt observes: Conflict is not an inevitable by-product of
to the political process, have taken place and have not succeeded.
cultural difference. However she correctly points out that
It is the failure to address or even acknowledge this fact that freezes a
differences can always erupt into conflict, or be manipulated into
cultural identity into the category of the non-negotiable. The act of
conflict. It is that manufactured species of conflict which it is the
recognition is missing and, closely allied to it, the offer of apology.
duty of cultural relations to deconstruct. That challenge will be met
Bassnett focuses on the performance of apology. She takes an
only by a fiercely independent courage to draw on the widest
example of a politician, President George W. Bush Jr, who offers an
consensus of humanity and the deepest understanding of ourselves
apology for the treatment of Iraqi prisoners-of-war. However, because the
and others.
apology is in the form of a personal confession I am sorry it focuses

on the speaker and does not address those in a different cultural frame
of reference, who need to be given the opportunity to forgive.
Working in the British Councils cultural relations think tank, I am
just as interested in why cultural relations can fail as in how they can
succeed. This example of apology shows two major reasons why
dialogue can founder. If we do not understand how communication is
taking place, the ways in which an encounter between different
cultures is structured, we are at a huge disadvantage. Knowledge is
involved, of the linguistic and extra-linguistic factors. But selfawareness is equally important since it enables us to glimpse the
hidden dimensions of power and difference at work in communication
and enter a virtuous circle: the more we engage in dialogue, the more
we learn about ourselves and the more we show our capacity to
reflect and change, the more we engender trust and reflection in
others. This awareness is also of the historical self, the past of the
national and other communities we belong to. For example, in talking
of chemical weapons, it should be part of my knowledge, that in the
1920s, the British Royal Air Force used poisoned gas to control those
Arabs and Kurds in Iraq who stood in the way of the imperial plan.
If we think that entering the virtuous circle of intercultural
dialogue is a matter of choice for those, like me, who work in cultural
relations, then the authors of this volume say we are wrong: it is an
imperative. Much intercultural dialogue happens without the
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 10
Planetarity *
on what actually happened. Not one student thinks this

consensus would actually be achieved, but most think it would
Mary Louise Pratt
be worthwhile to push the discussion as far as can be done. One

student suggested the perhaps dangerous technique of showing
a highly nationalist anti-Turkish Bulgarian historical film as a
centre for discussion.
2 One student suggested interviews with students of other

nationalities to find out what ethnic jokes are being told about
In December 2002 the following e-mail message appeared on my

screen, from a young Canadian teaching English composition in
ones own ethnicity.

3 One student suggested that the issue of religion should be
Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria. The reference is to an essay I wrote in 1991
approached through its place in daily life rather than through
called Arts of the Contact Zone, that was widely reprinted in
theology or general principles, saying people would find it easier
American college textbooks. It offered a template for thinking about

multiculturalism, multicultural pedagogy and democracy in the
to sympathise across confessional lines that way.

4
Americas: 1
Serbian students without exception blasted their previous

education as corrupted by nationalism. The war has had a deep
effect on them, and the quandary of being a Serb in 2002 is a
Dear Dr Pratt
significant concern for them. Kosovar Albanians, in contrast, are
I just thought you might like to know: I assigned your Contact Zone
piece from Ways of Reading to students here at the American
not especially preoccupied with the issues of the war.

5 Several students thought the study of linguistics would help a
University in Bulgaria. AUBG was established here after the fall of
class like this. Some Bulgarian students thought that it might be
communism with the aim of teaching critical thinking and leadership
scientifically proven that Macedonian is really a kind of Bulgarian.
on the model of an American liberal arts college. About 75 per cent
Other students thought that the incontrovertible presence of
of the students are Bulgarian, and the rest come, mostly, on
foreign, especially Turkish, words in each language, would help
scholarship from countries ranging from Croatia to Mongolia. In a
to dismantle myths of national purity.
first-year composition course I asked students to write an essay
Students stressed the demands on the professor in a class like this,
making suggestions for a course on Balkan civilisation. I got a wide
saying that principles would be less important than social skills in
range of responses.
context. All who mentioned the issue expressed a preference for
Most students stressed the study of history, suggesting that
an outsider rather than a person of Balkan nationality.
students compare school textbook accounts of single events
7 A few Bulgarian students devoted parts of their essays to
in the history of the region, and work carefully toward consensus
reaffirming their belief in nationalist Bulgarian views of Balkan

history: 500 years of the Ottoman yoke, etc.
* Planetarity: Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak uses this term as a category of analysis in her
recent book Death of a Discipline, New York, Columbia University Press, 2003.
10
8 Some students came to realise that they knew more about

France than about the country next door.
11
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 12
A cohesive group took issue with you on the issue of nation,
a source of counter-knowledge. Point seven, however, shows how
saying the idea of imagined community doesnt do justice to
difficult this can be when subaltern hierarchies of power are
nation as they experience it.
involved. The Bulgarians reasserted a subaltern identity linked to
So, your paper at the MLA years ago is still echoing here in Blagoevgrad.
claims for redress. Once articulated, essentialisms anchored in
Sincerely
claims to superiority or redress do not simply go away. They have to
Matthew de Coursey
be worked through.
Point six highlights the position of the mediator. In this case the
No one is more suspicious than I am of exported imperial
role is held by a subject I like to call the Committed Outsider, a
education models. Nevertheless I found the message moving. Here
position many scholars try to occupy as they study and teach
was a teacher putting a piece of writing to work across time,
literatures, languages and cultures not of their own time or place. In
distance, and difference to enable reflection on an unprecedented
Mr de Courseys classroom, his displacement and distance,
and traumatised present, on the pasts that made it, on possible
combined with his serious commitment to being where he is, enable
futures, and on learning itself. Mr de Courseys classroom was a self-
him to create the space for the intercultural dialogue. Both the
conscious exercise in intercultural dialogue. The nine points the class
displacement and the commitment are necessary. On the other hand,
passed on had the makings of a book of wisdom on how to conduct
Mr de Courseys outsider status is useful only insofar as he is able to
such dialogues.
recognise and interact with the insider knowledge and experience of
Point one specifies the importance of rewriting history. Equally
those whose dialogue he is sponsoring. The fact that the search for
important, it describes the exercise of creating provisional
understanding was going on in a lingua franca that was nobodys
communities across lines of difference through a pursuit of
national tongue was probably quite valuable.
consensus. The pursuit need not actually produce consensus in
Point eight identifies the role of sanctioned ignorance in
order to succeed in enacting a provisional community and mediating
producing marginality, and point nine shows the need for marginal
differences.
subjects to revise and critique concepts (like imagined community)
Point two specifies the power of converting difference into

reciprocity, that is, of enacting or performing difference as
reciprocity. This is a form of cultural agency.
Point three calls for privileging the lived experience of
in order to refute marginality.

De Courseys account registers two features that usually
characterise intercultural dialogues: performativity and
improvisation. By performativity I mean that the interculturality does
differences over the knowledge, beliefs, and ideologies that codify
not consist solely, or even principally, in the content of the dialogue
them. At the level of belief, differences readily translate into
or the meanings produced, but in the fact of its taking place, in the
incompatibilities clashes of civilisations. But difference is lived as
embodied event or practice. 4 Improvisation refers to the obvious
coexistence, the co-presence of bodies in spaces the uneasy arts
fact that what makes intercultural dialogues necessary is a history of
of the Contact Zone. 3
their absence; the fact that relations of mutuality and reciprocity
Points four and five indict essentialism (myths of national

purity) and the instruments that produce it, and identify language as
12
have not been present, have broken down, or been detonated into
violence. Such relations cannot be conjured out of nowhere or
13
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 14
prescribed according to fixed models. They have to be made up out

of what is there in the embodied moment. Hence, performativity and
improvisation. And these two terms imply a third: imperfection.
Mr De Coursey was seeking to remedy the thing for which his
Let me apply the terms Ive been using to a second instance of

intercultural dialogue from the streets of New York City.
Not long ago I was standing at an intersection in Manhattan
beside one of the ubiquitous corner markets that are a New York
location has provided the master metaphor: balkanisation.
trademark. A womans voice, with the Korean accent of the store
Remarkably, he chose a head-on approach: reclaiming that very term
manager, cried Water! and the stores Mexican employee bounded
by having students imagine a course on Balkan civilisation. He
into the street in pursuit of a man who had just stolen a bottle of
proposed an imagined object whose contours were to be debated
water. Two delivery workers, a Jamaican and a Guatemalan, stood
through a collective pursuit of truth and understanding in which all
beside me on the corner. The Jamaican grabbed the Mexican by the
the participants are seen as having a stake. It was a risky choice,
arm and gently said, No, mon, dont be a fool. You could get yourself
perhaps, for it engaged the group in the civilisational thinking that
killed. Let him go. A dialogue ensued that ran something like this
so readily produces todays essentialisms. In that light, its significant
(with gestures, accents, the performative bleached out by writing):
that the imagined object was a course on Balkan civilisation, and not
Balkan civilisation itself.
Intercultural dialogues often hinge on such inclusive, imagined
Mexicano: But he stole water. Its my job.

Jamaican: No, its your job to chase him inside the store, but in
objects of inquiry. State-sponsored truth commissions are a recent
the street, let him go. Dont risk your life for 50 cents.
example. In the aftermath of internal wars, such commissions set up
Mexicano: If I dont stop him, the next guy will come along and
high-profile public dialogues that seek to reconcile antagonists
do the same thing.
around a shared account of events, and thus reconstitute the polis.
Jamaican: Thats not your problem, mon. Its 50 cents. And not
Such commissions assume that the state which went to war on its
even your 50 cents
citizens suppressed the facts about its violence. If the state is again
Mexicano: Its not the money. Its the act.
to be legitimate, these facts must be made public and condemned
Jamaican: You have to watch out for yourself. Nobody else
with perpetrators and victims in the same room. Discussion of truth
cares about you. You dont understand the system.
commissions often focuses on their limits and imperfections. But its
Mexicano: No, you dont understand the system.
helpful to think of truth here not as that which must be fully

specified, but (like De Courseys course on Balkan civilisation) as an
The Guatemalan did not speak enough English to participate.
imagined object in which the ex-antagonists all have a stake and
The Committed Outsider (me) offered to translate into Spanish for
whose construction is the occasion for their shared agency. Truth
him, but he seemed to understand well enough, and listened intently.
commissions, held as public events and often televised, are dramatic
I stood by thinking, exchanges like these are producing the future of
examples of the combined force of meaning and performance.
this city. Every minute of every day New Yorks global citizenry is at
In terms of restoring citizenship, the public performance of truth and
work exploring and explaining differences, negotiating identities,
the embodied engagement of perpetrators and victims are as
values, spaces, manners, ethics, tastes, meanings, and the
important as the facts revealed.
assumptions of mutual responsibility that make collective life work,
14
15
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 16
or fail. Some of this goes on in institutionalised, staged settings like
There are old contact zones and new ones. The Balkans have
De Courseys classroom, but most of it takes place informally,
been balkanised as long as anyone can remember thats why they
embedded in the active course of daily life. Unlike English, romance
gave us the metaphor. De Courseys classroom exemplifies the
languages can distinguish between (to use the Spanish terms)
intercultural work that seeks to refashion long-standing historical
multiculturalismo, a programmed intervention, and multiculturalidad,
relations among well-defined groups whose identities constitute each
the given fact of culturally diverse social formations. Whatever
other. Multiculturalism is perhaps originally associated with this work.
happens to the former, the latter is here to stay in most of the
Yet multiculturalism as a social and intellectual project was catalysed
worlds cities, shaped among other things by the structured
in the 1970s and 80s by dramatic increases in the global movement
inequalities of local and global orders.
of peoples, notably from Africa, Asia and Latin America to North
In his classroom, De Coursey occasioned the intercultural
America and Europe.

The New York street corner encounter is a product of these more
dialogue by positing an inclusive imaginary object (Balkan

civilisation) around which he asked his students to explore their
recent developments. Neo-liberalism had much to do with creating the
differences. On the New York street corner, the dialogue arrived at
structures of opportunity and cruel necessity that brought the Korean,
such another object, the system. The speakers came to agreement
the Jamaican, the Mexican, the Guatemalan, and me, to that spot, to
about the fact that they had different understandings of the system.
our forms of employment, and our places in hierarchies of exploitation.
Each recognised the others version, and the importance of knowing
Yet history was profoundly in play there too. The two mens contrasting
the system. Difference translated into reciprocity. Provisional
views of citizenship and responsibility are not idiosyncratic, after all.
community was created across lines of difference through a pursuit
Behind the Jamaicans arguments is the fractured history of plantation
of truth that did not need to produce consensus in order to succeed.
slavery and resistance culture in the Caribbean. Behind the Mexicanos
Again the exchange was improvised, created out of what was in play
arguments are Mesoamericas indigenous and agrarian traditions,
in the situation where it took place, and it was imperfect (the
where prestige is acquired in the community through the acceptance
Guatemalan, for instance, could not participate fully).
of responsibilities, and rights are contingent on contributing. (In this
Here too performativity was at least as important as the
sense, two differing systems are indeed present here.) Rapidly
production of meaning. At the level of meaning the Jamaican argued
accelerating movement of peoples is creating not a world without
for self-interest and self-preservation. Yet at the level of embodied
history, but the proliferating intersection of histories.
practice, he was undertaking an act of altruism and solidarity

underscored by the gentleness of his words. By his own argument, the
safety of the Mexicano was not his problem, yet in making the
II
argument he went out of his way to make it his problem. At the level of
I would like to pick up this question of intersecting histories to
argument the Mexicano disagreed with the Jamaican, but at the level
approach some recent scholarly arguments about how struggles for
of embodied practice, by stopping to talk, he de facto took the advice.
justice and well-being should be carried out in a world in which
(The thief defiantly sauntered off.) The dialogue, in other words, went
diverse values and competing claims increasingly interact.
on simultaneously and differently as meaning and performance.
Intellectuals for a long time now have been bumping up against the
16
17
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 18
limits of Western secular humanism. One of the most conspicuous

and consequential of those limits has been the contradiction
what is seen as a competitive global endgame.

On the left, which is the side Im interested in here, relativism is
between universalism and egalitarianism on the one hand, and on
criticised for making it impossible to legitimate egalitarian values of
the other, the structures of exclusion and otherness without which
justice, democracy and rights even though these are deemed
modernity cannot perceive itself.
universal. The democratic, inclusive impulses of multiculturalism, we
The much-maligned identity movements that so disconcerted
hear, leave the left with no authority to prescribe democratic and
left and right in the 1980s, based on ethnicity, race, gender and
egalitarian values against authoritarianism and hierarchy on the
sexuality, rose out of those modernist exclusions. So did many of our
right. 6 The only way to move forward, say these voices, is to agree to
current demands for intercultural dialogue. It is interesting to think
leave behind the wounds of the past that divide us, and meet
of those movements in terms of what systems theorists call
together again beneath the sign of the European Enlightenment.
autopoeisis, the generative process whereby everything that lives
In a recent essay called Finding our way back to the
realises its mode of being.5 They converted exclusion and inequality
Enlightenment, for example, New York intellectual Thomas de
into motors of autopoeisis, producing knowledges, desires,
Zengotita eloquently elaborates the argument. Speaking in the
meanings, and agents intellectuals, artists, critics and politicians.
context of the rise of the right in the United States and abroad, de
These knowledges were, and still are, heresies seeking to become
Zengotita argues urgently that Enlightenment humanism is the only
orthodoxies. A paradigmatic case, and protagonist, has been
basis for a coherent ideology capable of uniting progressive forces
transnational feminism, a work still in progress. A more recent case is
in this critical hour.7 The basis for democratic politics must be:
the new worldwide protagonism of indigenous peoples, another work

in progress, that began in the 1990s.
From other spaces of intellectuality, however, such autopoeisis
An identification with humanity in its totality and with each

human being . . . in its secular form this identification is rooted
from exclusion is continuously denounced as parochial, balkanising,
in the ideals of Enlightened humanism, ideals articulated by
egotistical a failure of solidarity. The recognition of diversity, some
Locke, Rousseau and Kant and put in play historically by the
claim, has led to a paralysing relativism that has made it impossible to
Bill of Rights and the Declaration of the Rights of Man. However
establish norms to underwrite collective actions and prescriptions
miserably partisans of these principles failed to fulfil them in
across lines of difference. Among conservatives, relativism is seen as a
practice, the principles themselves are unambiguous, and they
threat to God-given norms about such matters as gender roles, sexual
all depend on that fundamental identification of each of us with
behaviour, hierarchy and authority. At this moment of writing (summer
all of us, with the sheer human being abstracted in the ideal
2004), nationalism, patriotism, and militarism are on the rise in many
from concrete contexts of history and tradition.
places, notably Europe and the United States, and religious

fundamentalisms have become privileged tools for conducting
We must be open, he insists, to the possibility that the modern
geopolitical conflict and asserting authoritarianism. Such attempts at
western tradition has a genuine claim a superior claim on the
forced homogenisation at times look like panicked responses to the
allegiance of humanity after all. His final advice is that his readers
complexity of the world, and at others like calculating positionings in
put down Foucault and pick up Voltaire.
18
19
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 20
I cite Zengotita as representative of an eloquent and vociferous
the present. Identity politics, I would argue, take form as such after
current in contemporary debate about values, defined by its call for
groups have made long and persistent efforts to achieve inclusion
a renewed consensus around Enlightenment universalism and
and access, especially to the political process, and have not
rejection of that unloved and elusive villain, identity politics. As
succeeded. Only then, I would argue, do identity formations politicise
attractive and convincing as this position may be, the response of
themselves. In the United States, the refusal of the Democratic Party
historically excluded groups can be predicted. For the few who have
to racially integrate party caucuses in 1962 forced the politicisation
attained a voice in the debate, the idea of what Fred Moten has
of the Black movement. The Zapatista movement in Mexico appeared
called a voluntary de-racialisation of the democratic project, 8 or an
only after many decades of unsuccessful struggle for recognition
invitation to voluntarily reneutralise gender, is unacceptable. It would
and redress by indigenous groups; only after other avenues seemed
lead directly to the loss of the few spaces excluded groups have
exhausted. Continued exclusion in the present, not past resentment,
tenuously won, and of the social understandings they have brought.
explains subordinated groups; rejection of the homogenising
How to exit this impasse? My own argument so far would invite

me to see the Enlightenment as an imagined object around which
proposal and superior claims of a renewed Enlightenment.

The second misunderstanding has to do with what I have come to
de Zengotita seeks to form a provisional community engaged in a
call the monopolism of Enlightenment thought. 9 Let me explain. The
shared pursuit of truth and understanding. The point would be not to
call for a return to Enlightenment principles as the only alternative for
arrive at a consensus about the Enlightenment, but to engage in a
humankind seems to depend to a significant degree on ethnographic
consensus-building debate. My contribution, however, will be to
and historical error. The error lies in attributing to the Enlightenment a
argue that we need a different imagined object one that might be
monopoly on those principles, as if nothing like them have ever existed
called the global or planetary human.
anywhere else in human geography or history. But do we really think

that no other cultures have the ability to conceive of humankind as a
III
totality? That the powers of rationality were discovered only once, and
It seems to me that this call for a return to the Enlightenment, which
places, the idea of freedom has been born only once? That the city is
has intensified in the USA in the face of rising authoritarianism, is
an invention of modernity or of Europe? That cosmopolitanism has
shaped by a pair of misunderstandings that can perhaps be clarified.
been unique to the West?
The first has to do with the historicity of that snark: identity
in France? Or that, though slavery has existed (and exists) in many
Take for example the idea of the common good. Historically and
politics. The so-called identity groups accused of fragmenting the
ethnographically we know that the idea of the common good is not a
struggle for the common good do not, we know, come from
unique invention of the European Enlightenment. It has been
nowhere. They are constituted through lack of access to that
invented and reinvented since time immemorial. Its been a common
common good. This much is agreed on. These exclusions are often
good of human groups all over the planet. Not necessarily all human
understood as ills from the past, to be atoned for or gotten over, or
groups but lots of them theres no need to posit universals here,
both. Yet (and here is the point often overlooked) the ills of the past
only multiple genealogies. The claim is just that the idea of the
acquire significance only because the exclusions are still going on in
common good has more than one narrative of origin.
20
21
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 22
Just as the West has never had a monopoly on greed, genocide,
Once you think past the idea of a Western monopoly on what
enslavement, exploitation, authoritarianism, heterosexism, religious
the West denotes as Enlightenment principles, a straightforward
violence, patriarchy and injustice, so the West has not had a
alternative appears. It is to dissolve the narrative of the
monopoly on empiricism, rationality, principles of equality, liberty,
Enlightenment into a planetary human history whose elements not
justice, the rule of law, the responsibility of the strong toward the
necessarily universals have been invented and reinvented in more
weak and the entitlement of all to security and well-being. Elements
times and places than we will ever know. What de Zengotita calls the
like these, and indeed the ability, as de Zengotita puts it, to identify
ideals of Enlightenment humanism, including the idea of humanity in
with humanity in its totality, have had a plural existence throughout
its totality and each human being need not be subsumed into the
the panorama of human societies. (Note again, though, that I am not
epic of occident, with its vast imperial contradictions. Rather, what
speaking of universals. My approach doesnt require me to.) De
appears is what Caribbean scholar Sylvia Wynter calls a new
Zengotita fleetingly acknowledges this alternative. Reiterating the
semantic charter, a humanitas now conceived as isomorphic with
modern Western traditions, genuine claims on the allegiance of
the global human rather than with merely its Indo-European
humanity, he allows a tiny parenthesis: (there may be other sources
expression.12
for these principles). But the point stays right there caged between
The global human may sound like an idealist proposal, or a nave
the parentheses. Common sense in these debates still assumes
reaffirmation of innate human goodness, or an inversion of the
Enlightenment principles to be the exclusive property of the
civilisationbarbarism polarity, or a rehomogenisation of the species.
Enlightenment. In fact that seems to be one of the conventions of
But it is none of these. Above all it is not a universalist proposal.
the debate, even among critics of what Judith Butler calls the
Rather it tries to solve the problems universalism raises.
colonial, expansionist logic of Enlightenment universalism. 10

The argument Im making has been continuously repeated by
When one lets go of the commonsense idea of the metropolitan

monopoly on Enlightenment principles, one can imagine mobilising
post-colonial and progressive multicultural thinkers. Nobel prize-
the points of intersection that exist among multiple societies and
winning economist Amartya Sen, for instance, recently lamented the
histories, something the cybernetic revolution and geographic
confusion caused by the belief that democracy is a quintessentially
mobility make increasingly possible. Let me offer a single very simple
Western idea.11 This commonplace view, Sen notes, elides the deep
example from the contemporary global stage: struggles over the
diffusion of ancient Greece into the Middle East, India, and Northern
privatisation of water. Pretty much every time privatisation is
Africa, which predates its influence in Europe. More important today,
proposed, people whether in Collingwood, Ontario or Cochabamba,
Sen argues, is the historical point that while public reasoning
Bolivia defend the idea of water as a common good belonging
flourished in many ways in ancient Greece, it did that also in several
equally to everyone. The force of this idea in the world right now lies
other ancient civilizations sometimes spectacularly so. He cites
precisely in the fact that, in purely ethnographic terms, it has many
examples from India, Japan, and southern Africa, concluding that
genealogies; it has originated on who knows how many different
public reasoning in various forms has had a long history across the
occasions in the course of the history and geography of human
world, and these traditions in diverse cultures make it hard to see
groups. In todays global scenario, the idea of water as a common
democracy as an essentially Western idea.
good exists as a point of intersection of multiple genealogies, which
22
23
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 24
have the capacity to resonate with and reinforce each other. Such
endpoint. The disequilibriums they have produced are too great.
points present obvious occasions for intercultural agency.
Over the last decade institutions have begun to multiply at the global
As this example suggests, it is easy now to posit a planetary
or planetary level creating tensions and counterweights against the
concept of the human that is superordinate to the Indo-European
crushing momentum of the WTO and the IMF: the World Economic
expression. Recent proposals for the wholesale reworking of
Summit in Davos was deliberately counterweighted by the World
knowledge suggest the force of this possibility. Masao Miyoshi,
Social Summit in Porto Alegre. Alongside the World Bank, a World
among others, has called for a reorganisation of the pursuit of
Court is making its appearance. And weve had the set of
knowledge under the aegis of ecology and planetary survival. The
experiments with world summits on water in Kyoto; on racism in
concept of planetarity is central in the recent epistemic proposals
South Africa. A World Congress of Indigenous Peoples has been
of Gayatri Spivak. Iraqi scholar Ferial Ghazoul insists on a
meeting every two years for a decade. When Jacques Chirac
subterranean collective self in which we all partake, and a promise
promised a rponse planetaire to pandemics like AIDS, he was
of global collectivity.13 It is no accident that these thinkers all inhabit
speaking from a subject position that only relatively recently
multiple Western and non-Western intellectual terrains.
acquired orthodoxy. Transnational feminism, beginning with the UN
The idea of the global human remains heretical to a doctrine
Decade for Women, provided many of the templates for these kinds
many Westerners have installed in their heads: that the human was
of gatherings. Its immense achievements are often overlooked.
invented by humanism. But here again we can repeat the point: it is
Though the hegemony of the rich countries remains in force, these
not in the slightest necessary to be occidental or occidentalised in
emergent planetary initiatives are symptoms, among many others, of
order to conceive of humanity or the human in totalising terms; it
a dynamic multifaceted planetary scenario, quite improvisatory and
can be done from anywhere. Many people felt an imagined planetary
unpredictable, with new forms of citizenship, agency and politics
polis was provisionally brought into being on 15 February 2004, in
under construction.
the unprecedented worldwide demonstration against the invasion of

Iraq not a series of separate demonstrations in different places, but
a single demonstration planetary in scale, archipelagal in form,
IV
performative and semantic in character, improvised and imperfect,
Before I end these remarks, one point may need underscoring. Local
held together by mobile phones, internet communications, digital
tumults and civilisational rhetorics encourage people to think that
images, and imaginations. In this moment of enormous planetary
the very presence of differences naturally or inevitably produces
change, marked by polarisation, disposability, disequilibrium and
conflict. But this is false. Difference is not inherently a problem. All
danger, that improvised polis was an important Utopian moment.
over the world groups with radically different ways of life and world
Even people like myself who, for a long time, saw the term
views (including men and women; old and young) stably coexist,
globalisation as a fake alibi for capitalism and empire, now recognise
living in all kinds of dynamic arrangements and continually
that a new phase in the existence of the planet does seem to be
negotiated relationships. The thing we are calling intercultural
occurring, its outlines still in flux. Three decades of neo-liberal
dialogue goes on all the time without programmatic efforts to
plunder have marked the beginning of something but they are not an
construct it. The erroneous and often unconscious notion that
24
25
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 26
difference by nature produces conflict implies, horribly, that
can intercultural dialogue consist of between parties who value
homogeneity is somehow some kind of solution. This is entirely false,
mutual understanding and parties who do not? What kinds of
and also pernicious, insofar as it authorises those in power to
dialogues are actually possible between democratic, egalitarian,
suppress differences as a matter of course.
anti-essentialist paradigms and hierarchical, fundamentalist,
Conflict is not an inevitable by-product of cultural difference,
doctrinal paradigms? Its impossible in this brief essay to address
but differences can always erupt into confrontation, or be
these difficult and fascinating questions. Anthropologists and
manipulated into violence. Political interests, competition for power
historians will tell you, however, that these are precisely the points
or resources, demands for equality or redress, relocations and
at which the most profound learning and growth take place. For
demographic alterations factors such as these mobilise
one encounters ones own ability to grasp what one finds
differences into confrontation. It works the other way round too:
intolerable. Clifford Geertz makes the point eloquently:
conflicts generate paradigms of cultural difference with which to

give themselves meaning. Intercultural dialogue becomes an
The truth of the doctrine of cultural (or historical it is the
object of concern, as in this book, in response to actually existing
same thing) relativism is that we can never apprehend another
conflicts. People seek it out as an instrument for resolving or
peoples or another periods imagination neatly, as though it
defusing conflicts. Here again, its work is as much performative as
were our own. The falsity of it is that we can therefore never
semantic. At the level of meaning it seeks mutual knowledge and
genuinely apprehend it at all. We can apprehend it well enough,
understanding; at the level of performance it creates occasions for
at least as well as we apprehend anything else not properly
non-violent interchange among conflicting parties.
ours; but we do so not by looking behind the interfering glosses
It also, we should note, takes sides. It is probably important to
that connect us to it, but through them.14
recognise that the concept of intercultural dialogue emerges from

within democratic ideologies that regard inequality and subjugation
The encounter with powerful sensibilities radically different
as undesirable and unjust. From this perspective situations where
from ones own comes, however, only at the expense of [ones]
ideas of difference underwrite the subordination of one group by
inward ease. Whatever use the imaginative productions of other
another appear as in need of intervention. Dialogue becomes an
peoples predecessors, ancestors, or distant cousins can have
intervention, because it places the unequal parties into a
for our moral lives, says Geertz, it cannot be to simplify them.
symmetrical exchange. To do this is to take sides with the
Even as it prizes a certain neutrality, a forceful idea of intercultural
subordinated party where there is one, to open up conflict between
dialogue is not then ethically or politically neutral. Even as it seeks
oppressor and oppressed, not defuse it, even as one aims to
to defuse conflict and advance its ideas of justice, it actively seeks
produce mutual understanding and acceptance.
out that inward unease and seeks to produce it in others. What
This ideological grounding in democratic, egalitarian values
makes this necessary and revealing is the fact, to use Geertzs
makes inevitable the familiar points of paradox: how can tolerance
words, that the interfering glosses are both what divide and
include tolerance for intolerance? What can be achieved by a
connect participants in the encounter.
multicultural openness to antidemocratic fundamentalisms? What
26
27
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 28
Postscript on language
After weeks, negotiations broke down over a single final point:
Vadim Perelmans film The House of Sand and Fog, based on the
whether languages of two powerful minority groups, Turkmen and
novel by Andre Dubus III, narrates a tragic confrontation between
Uzbek, would have official status along with the majority languages,
a young Anglo-American woman and an Iranian immigrant who
Pashto and Dari. This provision would permit the founding of schools
acquires her house by government auction after a miscalculation of
in those languages, for example. The Pashtuns refused to budge. The
her tax liability. At a pivotal point in the story, the distraught woman
minority leaders prepared to go home. The UNs Algerian negotiator,
calls on the Iranians gentle and unhappy wife to explain the
Lakhdar Brahimi, shuttled among the sides, and at last a compromise
situation. The viewers hopes rise. Will the women be able to find a
was reached: the minority languages would have official status in the
just solution where the men are acting by codes of violence and self-
regions where they were spoken. Afghanistans president, of Dari
interest? The young woman describes what has happened. The wife
ethnicity, congratulated the leaders in Uzbek.
looks on sympathetically. Then a pause. You dont understand a
It is impossible to think seriously about intercultural dialogue
thing Im saying, do you? The Iranian wife hands her a paper: You
without coming to grips with the linguistic dimensions of todays
write it all down. I show to my husband. The possibility of a womens
planetary social, ecological, economic, political and imaginary
solution is blocked by another gendered reality: the sequestered
realignments. It can be hard to see them in part because language is
immigrant wife trapped in monolingualism and its attendant
always there; always at work. It is the medium in which both the
dependency. This too is a story with multiple genealogies.
realigning and the analysis of it are going on. It is also the
Later, another linguistic failure triggers the films disastrous
performance arena. Language is often a revealing symptom of
climax. The Iranians teenage son is shot and killed when he attacks
current transformations, but it is also a powerful agent in its own
a rogue police officer who has been trying to help the young woman
right. Yet its force is almost inevitably overlooked in theorisations of
recover her house. His reason? The cop has mispronounced his
globality, mobility, markets, and geopolitics. In the two anecdotes
name, calling him Ishmael instead of Esmail. It is the last straw.
15
The House of Sand and Fog is about immigration, its geopolitics,
with which I began this essay, everything depended on the

availability of a lingua franca, English, to which participants had
its transcultural improvisations, its charged, even fatal, poetics.
uneven access. But, as the Afghanistan negotiations suggest,
Language and translation are at the heart of these, as they are at the
demands for local linguistic powers can match or trump demands for
heart of events unfolding as I write in Afghanistan, the Middle East, and
state languages and transnational lingua francas, and they should.
Guantnamo. 16 The allusion to Moby-Dick is almost too obvious: which
Linguistic heterogeneity is not in itself undesirable, nor is linguistic
is it going to be in 21st-century America? Will Ahab learn to say Esmail,
homogeneity inherently desirable.
or will Esmail accept a Christianising name change? Language, or
The linguistic geography of the planet is changing rapidly, and
rather linguistic difference, determines the tragic plot of Perelmans
even the specialists have very little idea what the world will be like
film, yet its central role is very likely to escape the viewers notice.
linguistically a hundred years from now. For students of intercultural
Around the same time that The House of Sand and Fog made its
dialogue, that is a formidable challenge.
debut, the regional leaders of Afghanistan gathered in Kabul to

negotiate a constitution. It was a founding moment for a new state.
28
29
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 30
Endnotes
Arts of the Contact Zone, Profession (Modern Language Association) 9,
11
1991: pp. 3340.

2
For exploration of this term see Doris Sommer (ed.), Cultural Agency,
Academy of Arts and Sciences, spring 2004, pp. 811.

12
Durham: Duke University Press, 2004.

3
In the essay referred to, I defined contact zones as: social spaces where
13
Forum, Modern Language Association Annual Convention, December 2003.
highly asymmetrical relations of power, such as colonialism, slavery, or their
On planetarity see also Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Death of a Discipline,
I am indebted to performance studies theorist Diana Taylor for my
New York: Columbia University Press, p. 101.

14
Geertz, Clifford, Found in translation: On the social history of the moral
introduction to this term, and related concepts. See Diana Taylor, The
imagination, Local Knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology.
Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas,
NY: Basic Books, 1983: p. 44.

15
Both these episodes take place somewhat differently in the novel, which
See H. Maturana y F. Varela, Autopoeisis and Cognition: The Realisation of
thematises language even more extensively than the film. Dubus studied
the Living, London: D. Reidel, 1980, cited in Sylvia Wynter, The Ceremony
Farsi for two years to write his novel, and invents a FarsiEnglish narrative
Must Be Found: After Humanism, boundary 2 12:3 and 13:1, special issue
on Humanism and the University, springfall 1984, 1970, p. 22.
6
I refer to papers presented by these three scholars at the Presidential
cultures meet, clash, and grapple with each other, often in contexts of
Durham: Duke University Press, 2003.

5
Wynter, The Ceremony Must Be Found (op.cit. note 5), p. 37. Note the
performativity of Wynters call for a ceremony.
aftermaths.
4
Amartya Sen, Whats the Point of Democracy? Bulletin of the American
In the USA, right-wing groups such as the American Council of Trustees
voice that is a linguistic tour de force.

16
Farsi, the language being spoken and misspoken in The House of Sand and
Fog, has long been on the State Departments list of critical languages.
and Alumni have appropriated the language of diversity to challenge

faculty governance over academic appointments in the name of
deological diversity.
7
Thomas de Zengotita, Common Ground: Finding Our Way Back to the

Enlightenment, Harpers magazine, 306, January 2003: 37.
Paper presented at conference on Critical Cosmopolitanisms, Irvine,

California, March 2003.
For further discussion of this concept, see M. L. Pratt, Modernity and

Periphery: Towards a Global and Relational Analysis, in Elizabeth MudimbBoyi (ed.), Beyond Dichotomies. Albany, NY: SUNY UP: pp. 2147.
10
Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau and Slavoj Zizek, Contingency, Hegemony,

Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, London and New York:
Verso 2000, p. 45. This volume is disappointingly symptomatic of the
problem I am diagnosing here. Its discussions of contingency, hegemony
and universality take place in entirely Eurocentric terms.
30
31
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 32
Building an international
organisation
Ron G. Manley
The treaty specified that they be appropriately qualified for the task
and drawn from as wide a geographical base as possible. Unlike the
majority of international Secretariats, whose staff are principally
linguists, administrative, legal and secretarial personnel, ours would
also include around 270 technically qualified personnel to staff its
Inspectorate and Verification Divisions. The requirement was for
experienced, professionally qualified, chemical engineers, industrial
chemists, chemical weapons specialists, analytical chemists and
Building any new organisation from scratch is a complex process.
medical personnel. Finding these people was to prove a lengthy and
Finding the right people, bringing them together, welding them into
challenging task, occupying four or five colleagues and myself for
an efficient and fully functional unit requires patience, perseverance
much of the next three years.
and a lot of luck. Building a new international organisation adds a
Initially, the Head of the Secretariat interviewed candidates
whole new dimension of complexity to this process. This short essay
nominated by the member states and made his selection, taking
describes the building of one such organisation: the Technical
due note of the need to maintain an appropriate geographical
Secretariat of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical
balance by no means an easy task. While this process worked well
Weapons (OPCW).1
during the early days, it was no way to recruit the large number of
The member states of the OPCW decided that its headquarters
personnel required at entry into force of the CWC. The proposed
should be established in The Hague, and in February 1993 a
220 inspectors needed to staff the Inspectorate, for example, would
Preparatory Commission was established in that city, along with the
have to be recruited in two batches: the first batch of 120 brought
first members of a provisional Technical Secretariat to service it. By
on board at entry into force, and the second batch of 80 starting
the time I joined the Secretariat in early September, as Head of its
12 months later.
Chemical Demilitarisation Branch, the number of staff had increased
The problem was how to find these experienced, professionally
to around 20. The Preparatory Commission was to be succeeded by
qualified technical personnel and then persuade them to relocate
the OPCW when the treaty entered into force, exactly 180 days after
themselves and their families to the Netherlands, to join an
th
65 countries had ratified it. The 65 country to ratify the Chemical
organisation many of them had never heard of, with a starting date
Weapons Convention (CWC) was Hungary, which deposited its
since employment could only commence on a date dependent on
ratification document at the United Nations headquarters, in New
the deposit of the 65th ratification unknown. Staff regulations and
York, on 31 October 1996. The OPCW and its Technical Secretariat
rules were still under discussion by the member states. So, we were
came into being on 27 April 1997.
also unable to guarantee the terms and conditions under which they
would be employed.
Finding and recruiting the people
Nevertheless, information packages containing a brief
Our Technical Secretariat was to be staffed with between 450 and
description of the organisation and its proposed function, detailed
500 personnel, drawn exclusively from member states of the OPCW.
job descriptions for each post, salary scales and provisional terms
32
33
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 34
and conditions of employment were duly prepared in the six official
the question Please give details of your current post, an applicant
languages of the United Nations (Arabic, Chinese, English, French,
from Western Europe or North America usually furnished a full
Russian and Spanish) for member states to circulate. Details were
description of what the candidate did, often including an extensive
placed in English on the organisations website, which proved one of
CV. Applications from Russia and Eastern Europe might contain a
the more effective ways of attracting potential candidates. The
one-line entry, such as Head of Analytical Laboratory for a given
response, despite all these uncertainties, was a steady, if
company or organisation, or Chief Engineer for a production unit
geographically patchy, stream of applications, which was an
within a company; while those received from Asian candidates often
indication of the level of commitment of the applicants to the
understated the extent of the candidates actual experience. Since
objectives of the CWC.
most of the application forms were completed in English, frequently
While in general the number of applications from Asia, North
not the applicants first language, cultural differences and language-
America, West and Eastern Europe was satisfactory, the response
related issues were rife. Many times, we were obliged to go back to
from many individual countries within these regions was poor,
the applicant or his government for further clarification, before
and from Africa and Latin America extremely low. Additional efforts
around 400 candidates were finally shortlisted for interview.
were undertaken to overcome these deficiencies, by placing
We were planning to conduct interviews in English, but it
advertisements in trade journals, or sending a member of the
rapidly became clear that this was not going to work. While
Secretariat staff to talk to relevant national organisations. A Brazilian
candidates were often perfectly capable of holding a
colleague made a particularly successful trip to Latin America,
conversation, understanding highly technical questions and
eliciting another dozen, good, applicants from that region.
providing equally complex technical answers in English was a
Formal meetings of the organisation were conducted in all six
different matter. Following one particularly difficult interview with
official languages using simultaneous translation, but the day-to-day
a Chinese candidate in Beijing early on, a member of the panel
working language of the Secretariat was English. Candidates were,
remarked that the candidate appeared to have a very poor
therefore, required to provide an indication of their fluency in
command of the Secretariats working language. A Chinese
English and any other spoken or written languages, as well as their
colleague politely responded that this was the first opportunity
experience for the vacancy for which they were applying. By the
that the candidate had ever had of speaking English with a non-
end of the process we had received over 1,200 applications from
Chinese person, the panel should understand, and that secondly,
around 70 countries for the 200 inspectors, plus a considerable
as the panel was made up of an American, an Australian and a
number for the 70 or so technical posts at HQ.
Cornishman, we might like to consider the possible impact of this
Drawing up shortlists of candidates for each vacancy or type of
on the candidates comprehension. This salutary lesson was fully
vacancy proved to be much more difficult than expected for those
taken on board. Interviews continued to be held in English, but it
of us on each small review panel. Quite apart from the number of
became standard practice, wherever practicable, to include a
factors under consideration qualifications, relevant experience,
panel member fluent in the candidates first language.
language skills, country of origin there were wide variations in

familiarity with completing this type of application form. In answer to
34
However, a formal interview with a panel of interviewers is

very much a Western concept. For many candidates from Asia and
35
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 36
Eastern Europe, this was a novel experience. Great care was
candidates were professionally qualified, there were wide variations
necessary to ensure that candidates were not only put at ease but
in their level and breadth of practical experience. Moreover, few had
also provided with an explanation of the interview process and its
any detailed knowledge of the CWC or of the role of an on-site
purpose, so that they did not, albeit inadvertently, undersell
inspector. Member states had decided that the two groups would be
themselves.
required to undertake a specially developed, 26-week, training
By this time the recruiting staff had come to the view that,
however essential the qualifications and experience for these
course.
The course was made up of four distinct modules: the first was
posts, the key to the creation of a successful international
designed to provide the trainees with a solid understanding of the
organisation was to recruit staff with the ability to work and
CWC, the role of the OPCW and the duties, privileges and immunities
function well in a multinational and multicultural environment. One
of its inspectors, as well as a basic grounding in the history and
of the more important objectives of the interview, therefore, was
technology of chemical weapons. The second module consisted of a
to gather sufficient information to enable us to form an opinion on
number of specialist courses reinforcing the knowledge of each
how flexible, and also committed to such an environment
group of experts. Over a period of about 12 weeks, the analytical
candidates were. How well would each cope with living and
chemists, for example, were provided with extensive training in the
working together? Were they team players? This is of course very
collection and analysis of samples in the field and the procedures
much a subjective measure and not always easy to determine. If
necessary to ensure their integrity and accurate analysis. Chemical
asked were they team players, those who understood the
engineers and industrial chemists received additional training in
question would inevitably say yes and those that did not would
chemical industry processes and production methods.
not know how to answer. Many Asian candidates, for example, are
The third module provided training in the actual planning and
collegiate by nature and culture, and simply did not comprehend
carrying out of on-site inspections. During this period the trainees, in
the question. A more indirect approach was, therefore, necessary.
addition to attending lectures, were formed into teams and given the
Candidates, for example, were asked to describe how they dealt
task of planning a number of inspections. While, by this time, the
with a difficult problem that had occurred during their working
trainees had been living and working together for a number of
career, with superiors, colleagues or subordinates?
months, this was their first opportunity to work together as
Some of us may have had initial prejudices about where this
inspection teams and, at this point, the need for good team skills
requirement for flexibility and compatibility was most likely to be
became paramount. National and cultural differences in the
found. In the event, there was no difficulty in identifying the type in
approach to solving problems and getting things done became more
all nationalities and cultures. Having selected our staff, we were
evident, and it was necessary for them to learn to overcome this and
now faced with the challenge of establishing them and their
to appreciate that these differences could be used to their
families in The Hague.
advantage. Intercultural co-operation could be a real boon.

Inspections, after all, are an investigative process, and teams made
Getting them on board
up of people with different backgrounds and approaches to problem
The 220 inspectors posed particular problems. While all the
solving have a distinct advantage in such situations.
36
37
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 38
In the final module, inspectors were given the opportunity to
different kind of interdependence and mutual respect: something
plan and carry out inspections at two real facilities located in
closer to a celebration of difference, an ingenuity, which over and
different member states. Thirteen countries participated in the
over again would stand the new inspectors in good stead.
training programme and the majority of trainees undertook part of

their training in at least three or more of these countries.
The majority of the trainees were mid-career professionals.
The course provided them with the opportunity to travel, live

and work, for an extended period, with other trainees coming from
different backgrounds and with differing levels of experience.
Many of them had held senior positions in their own countries
When you walked into the coffee bar or canteen, people were not
military or chemical industries. In many cases they were used to
grouped by nationality or culture but by the bonds of friendship.
having numbers of subordinate staff to support them. A light-hearted
The sight of a table with people of six or seven nationalities sitting
comment often heard around the Secretariat was that there were
around it would not even warrant a second glance. Quite simply, the
enough Colonels in the Inspectorate to staff several national armies.
understandings formed during this period enabled the inspectors to
As inspector trainees, of course, everyone was on an equal footing.
function as a tight-knit and effective group. This proved to be the
They were each expected to join in and undertake their share of the
most valuable element of the whole training programme. It brought
tasks assigned to the team. This was somewhat of a shock for a
considerable, long-term, benefits to the Technical Secretariat and
number of them and some found it easier to adapt to their new
its staff.
situation than others.

But inspection is very much a team game. Once an inspection
Over two periods, a month at a time, inspectors successfully

completing their course travelled with their families from around 65
team leaves The Hague en route to the inspection site, it is basically
countries to arrive in The Hague. Absorbing so many people in such
on its own. They will of course receive support from the host
a short space of time requires a lot of patience on all sides. An
country, but the success of the inspection all comes down in the
extensive familiarisation programme was put together, under which
end to each member of the team not only carrying out his or her
local estate agents briefed them on the city, types of property
assigned tasks, but co-operating fully with the others. An important
available and typical rental costs or purchase prices. New arrivals
purpose of the training, of course, was to enhance these team skills.
were bussed around the city to see the different residential
But something much more subtle was working itself out during the
locations. Banks provided briefings on the Dutch banking system,
six months in which the same trainees learned to depend on each
while representatives from International, English and French schools
other for support and companionship, both during work and leisure
vied for the opportunity to educate their children. Briefings were
time. A lot of assumptions were challenged and expectations
available on Dutch laws, the medical system and culture. Major Dutch
reversed. Those who trained in Russia, for example, found that when
institutions, such as banks and insurance companies, generously
off duty they were almost entirely dependent on their Russian-
offered documentation in English. Somehow, the great influx was
speaking colleagues to get around and enjoy the local food. Even
accomplished without too much mishap.
when they were in countries where they spoke the language, or

English was understood, those familiar with the local culture were
Establishing communication
able to help those who were not. This was the beginning of a
English was the only language of which all 68 nationalities had some
38
39
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 40
knowledge. The staffs command of English varied considerably,
of pulling his leg, a lengthy and detailed explanation ensued.
however, and establishing a common degree of understanding was
Right from its inception the Technical Secretariat bought into
by no means an easy task. My own deputy from Belarus spoke very
the concept of an electronic office. All documents were produced,
little English when he first arrived. As I could not speak Russian, this
edited, circulated and stored within the organisation electronically.
led to many interesting exchanges during our first months of working
Every member of staff, therefore, was expected to be computer
together. Fortunately, we had a young American intern in the Branch
literate and capable of typing their own documents and letters. This,
who just happened to speak Russian, and was perfectly willing to
in itself, was a considerable shock to many, used to relying on
help out when we got really stuck. Subsequently our two families
secretaries in their previous posts. The level of IT experience among
became firm friends: we often think back on those early days with
the new staff varied from highly competent to zero, and a major
amusement.
education programme was necessary to bring everybody up to an
The situation was further complicated by the fact that, with the
exception of some of the South Africans, virtually none of the
acceptable level.
While the member states were responsible for establishing
international staff or their families spoke Dutch. Fortunately the
policy, the development of the associated administrative and
Dutch are very tolerant about language and English is widely
operational procedures was the responsibility of the Secretariat. In
understood throughout the Netherlands. It fell to the locally recruited
fact, completing this work for the new organisation was a major task.
staff of the Technical Secretariat to help sort out problems for the
With such a mixture of nationalities and backgrounds, everyone of
families of internationally recruited staff, many of whom spoke
course had their own solution to any given problem, and the secret
neither Dutch nor English, as they wrestled with local authorities and
was to try and find a common approach. The most successful way of
other institutions. Embassies based in The Hague also played a
doing this was to get the interested parties around a table and keep
valuable part in assisting their nationals to establish themselves in
them there until agreement was reached. As working relationships
the city.
became established, this task became noticeably easier.
Of course, communication problems were not confined to a lack

of a vocabulary, but also reflected the widely different national and
Creating a common ethos
cultural backgrounds. During the early days this led to considerable
One of the principal indicators of a successful organisation is the
confusion. A sense of humour and much patience were vital
presence of a common ethos or organisational culture; a set of
commodities.
standards of behaviour and performance accepted by all. Such an
Native English speakers had to learn to adapt their vocabulary,

phrasing and use of language. It was soon obvious that those for
organisational culture does not automatically appear when a new

organisation is created. It has to be actively encouraged.
whom English was a second language often had a better unders-
In a new international, multicultural, organisation there is the
tanding of English grammar than they did. Moreover, participants
added complication of deciding whose cultural standards should
frequently found their lectures among the most difficult, thanks in
form the basis of what is or is not acceptable behaviour. In reality the
part to the number of colloquialisms they unwittingly employed.
only way this can be achieved is for the organisation, along with the
When an English member of staff accused his Japanese colleague
full co-operation of its staff, to create its own, individual, culture. This
40
41
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 42
requires both patience and time and, despite its importance, will
out differences and establish effective working relationships.
normally have to be undertaken in parallel with its normal activities.
Headquarters staff, on the other hand, were expected to arrive, find
The Technical Secretariat was no exception. Its establishment

could not proceed in a vacuum. During its formative period, it had to
interact with the outside world and, in particular, with the member
themselves somewhere to live, and start work. For some of them, a

rather longer period of adjustment proved necessary.
As time passed, working relationships and behaviour patterns
states of the OPCW. The day-to-day role of providing assistance and
gradually began to evolve which were acceptable to the majority of
support to the member states had to continue to be met and the
the staff. One example of this was the use of e-mail. As everyone had
Secretariats verification role including on-site inspections, began in
access to a networked terminal one of the primary means of
earnest approximately one month after entry into force of the CWC.
communication within the Secretariat was e-mail. The problem is that
At that time its new headquarters was still under construction and
people will often write things in an e-mail or adopt a manner or tone
the staff were temporarily located at three different sites across The
that they would not use in a face-to-face conversation. While in some
Hague. During this period the priority for both Senior Management
cultures this may not cause too many difficulties, in a multicultural
and the staff of the Technical Secretariat was simply to survive to the
organisation it can lead to serious misunderstanding. It was,
end of each day.
therefore, necessary to alert staff to this problem and constantly
Over the following months, however, order gradually took over

from chaos and it was possible to begin looking at what we had
created. With hindsight, the chaos of those early months actually
remind them of the importance of avoiding the pitfalls associated

with badly or inappropriately worded e-mails.
Building on the emphasis they had put on multicultural flexibility
made a significant contribution to the formation of the Secretariats
since the early recruiting days, senior management decided to assist
culture. The sheer volume of work that had to be completed forced
the process by bringing in a team of international consultants to
staff rapidly to establish working relationships and to trust and
provide training for staff at all levels in good management practices
depend upon each other. People simply had to be prepared to
and working relationships. A change management team, headed by
compromise. Gradually, many came to realise that the breadth of
the Deputy Director-General and with team members representing
experience available in working with people from different cultures
staff at all levels, was established, given the task of consulting the
and backgrounds was a distinct advantage. There was no shortage
staff, and drawing up recommendations for ways to improve the
of new ideas and different approaches to solving the many problems
Secretariats operation and culture. This process established an
that arose.
effective two-way communication process between the senior
There were, of course, numerous disagreements and
management and the staff. Management became better informed of
misunderstandings en route. But the overriding desire to get on top
the issues that were of concern for the staff and staff came to
of the task meant that these had to be either swiftly resolved or put
appreciate some of the constraints under which the management
aside. This is one area where the members of the inspectorate had a
had to operate. Over time the Technical Secretariat has developed
distinct advantage over the rest of the Secretariat staff. The six
its own ethos and culture. While it is far from perfect it nevertheless
months they had spent living and working together during their
does provide a core set of values against which the behaviour of
training course had provided them with a great opportunity to sort
individuals within the organisation can be judged. Tolerance with
42
43
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 44
respect to cultural and religious differences, equal treatment of men
Technical Secretariat suffered from chronic under-funding, which
and women and the need to treat other staff members with courtesy
inevitably took its toll on staff morale.
are all part of these core values.

One of the spontaneous developments was for the various
Another major staff issue was the question of tenure. At a very

early stage in the life of the organisation, the member states
national or cultural groups to organise a party on their important
expressed the view that the Technical Secretariat should not be a
national or religious days, to which all staff and their families
career organisation. Total service within the Secretariat would be
were invited. As a result we celebrated the Chinese New Year,
limited to a maximum number of years. Before entry into the CWC,
Independence Day, Eid al-Fitr the feast at the end of Ramadan,
however, no decision had been reached on how many years, or how
and Diwali the Hindu festival of lights. This did a great deal to
the policy would be implemented. A final decision on this issue was
enhance our understanding of each others cultures and beliefs.
only reached in 2003, six years after the Technical Secretariat came
into being. As a result, a high proportion of current staff will be
Trials and tribulations
required to leave over the next three years. Again, the delay in
But it would be nave to assume that all of the teething problems in
reaching consensus wreaks its own havoc on staff morale, and will
setting up such an organisation can be speedily resolved.
probably continue to do so over the next few years.
Membership of the OPCW was also growing throughout this period,

increasing from 87 countries at entry into force to 164 countries
Benefits and rewards
today. Whenever possible the OPCW operates by consensus. The
Irrespective of such differences, the staff of the Technical Secretariat
decision-making process, therefore, can be both complex and
and the representatives of the member states are all striving for a
prolonged. While such delays are inevitable in any organisation with
common goal, the global elimination of chemical weapons. The
as large a number of interested parties as this, nevertheless, it has,
overriding commitment of the staff to the purpose of the OPCW and
on occasion, made the task of the Technical Secretariat more difficult
their understanding of the need to get on with the task helped to
than it needed to be.
generate a common spirit and a willingness to compromise. This was
Perhaps the best example of this is the age-old problem of

funding. In the case of the OPCW and its Technical Secretariat, the
operating costs are met by the member states. Each member state,
what brought them into the organisation, and it was a major factor in
their willingness to accept the inevitable difficulties.
But did we think it would work from the outset? Did we heck!
therefore, has a keen interest in the organisations programme of
We saw the need, but also the huge obstacles. No one could have
work and the budget necessary to support it. Add to this the fact
expected the amazing energy and dedication that was generated by
that there were no historical cost data in the early years, against
this group of people from everywhere.
which a proposed budget for the agreed programme of work could
In my experience the benefits of working in and helping to
be validated, and you have a recipe for disagreement. The outcome
create such a new international organisation, far outweigh the
is that the member states have had considerable difficulty each year
disadvantages. Whatever the frustrations, the opportunity to work
in reaching consensus on these items. During the first five years of
and live in such a multicultural and multinational environment,
its life, in common with so many international organisations, the
provides immeasurable benefits. Gaining an understanding of other
44
45
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 46
Endnotes
cultures and learning to see things from their point of view is just
The OPCW oversees the implementation of The Convention on the

Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical
one of these. The opportunity to enjoy the friendship of people from
Weapons and on their Destruction to give it its full title, or the CWC as it is
many different countries and backgrounds is another. The realisation
more conveniently known. At the time of writing, 162 countries have either
that, irrespective of background and culture, the majority of people
ratified or acceded to the CWC. Finally opening for signature in Paris in
in the world are seeking the same things, that is, the opportunity to
January 1993 after almost 20 years of negotiation, the CWC required its
live and raise their children in a moderately comfortable and
member states to forgo the development, production, stockpiling and use of
peaceful environment, is the subtlest of all gentle bonds.
chemical weapons and to destroy any that they possess within a set
During my time with the OPCW I was fortunate enough to travel

to many parts of the world, making friends in many countries. I look
back on the eight years I spent living and working in this environment
with great affection. I would not have missed one day of it.
timeframe. All facilities used for the production of chemical weapons must
either be destroyed or converted for use for peaceful purposes. Member
states of the CWC are also required to declare and submit to inspection by
OPCW inspectors, chemical production facilities, whether commercial or
military, that produce certain, specified, toxic chemicals or the precursor
chemicals necessary for their synthesis.
46
47
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 48
Intercultural dialogue in a
multilingual world
Susan Bassnett
English. Ironically, the very insistence on the personal carried by the

idea of saying one is sorry focuses attention wholly on the speaker,
not on anyone else.
President Bush, making his apology, had said he was sorry. In
the English-speaking world, this phrase might be read as more
sincere, more honest, than the formal verb to apologise. But given
that the notion of apology in so many languages involves a twostage process, first of asking and then of being granted pardon, it is
In May 2004, President Bush apologised to the world for the
easy to see how a seemingly innocent linguistic usage in one
treatment of Iraqi prisoners-of-war by US servicemen. Sitting in a
language can be interpreted totally differently in another. Perhaps
hotel room, tuned in to CNN, I listened to an interview with the
his advisers should have told him that. By saying he was sorry rather
London Ambassador of the Arab League. The conversation hinged
than by asking to be forgiven, he was creating an impression of
on the issue of what the President had said. He had not apologised,
arrogant self-sufficiency for speakers used to a linguistic system
the Ambassador declared, expressing his concern and noting that,
other than English. How often do we all do things that are sincerely
he only said he was sorry. The interviewer suggested that thismight
meant, couched in the terms that we understand and believe to be
be hair-splitting: surely saying sorry is the same as apologising?
appropriate, only to be completely misunderstood by the very
The ambassador insisted that it was not. The President had failed
people to whom we most want to reach out?
to apologise.
I reflected at length on this exchange. Which sentence in English
Language and culture can never be separated. Language has

been described as the heart in the body of culture, a metaphor aptly
appears more persuasive: I apologise wholeheartedly or I am very
illustrating their interconnectedness. The linguistic relativist school of
sorry? Can we distinguish between the sincerity of these two
thought, pioneered by Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf, argues
statements? My first reaction was to feel that saying sorry appeared
that different languages reveal different ways of conceptualising the
more heartfelt than a formal apology because it implies that some
world, and that no two languages can ever be sufficiently similar to
personal process of contrition has been involved. To apologise is the
reflect the same social reality. Languages are different and the
more formal, hence more distant register. Saying sorry seems to
realities that are expressed in language are also different. Anyone
carry more personal weight.
with knowledge of more than one language quickly learns that what
But the instant one moves out of English, the distinction is less
can be said in one language may be inexpressible in another.
clear. Were I to apologise formally in Italian, I might use a phrase
Bilinguals negotiate such differences, making adjustments that come
requesting the offended party to pardon me, such as Chiedo scusa.
close at times to personality shifts.
This formulation makes me the appellant. I ask for my apology to be
But cultural relativism is an uncomfortable proposition, because
accepted, and the communication loop is not closed until my
it runs so counter to what so many politicians would have us believe,
request is granted. After all, apology is a dual process, involving
i.e. that it is entirely possible to communicate perfectly across
more than one person in the interaction. That dimension is missing in
languages and cultures because contemporary human beings share
48
49
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 50
universal aims. Linguistic difference can easily be bridged, they
Taheri, as a Muslim, is not seeking in any way to criticise Islam
argue: all we need are trained translators and interpreters to guide
for this; rather he criticises those in the West who take what he
us across the frontiers of language. What is said in one language can
condemns as a fashionable, postmodernist, multicultural stance that
and must be translatable into another. No matter if we do not know
refuses to recognise the extent of cultural differences. Islam, he
any other languages: provided we have someone to interpret for us,
suggests, needs to be engaged in dialogue with other cultures, and it
all will be well.
needs to be subjected to critical scrutiny for its own benefit and the
Such a view is hopelessly nave. Translators and interpreters do,
benefit of the world in the future. At the same time, the West should
of course, play a vital role in international communication, but they
beware of making assumptions about universality that are simply
are not all-powerful. The reality is that it is extremely difficult first to
untenable. There are great differences between Islamic and Christian
acknowledge that difference exists, and then, once difference is
cultures differences of history, culture and belief and these are
recognised, to begin the enormous task of negotiating the cultural
articulated through language.
divide. An illusion of sameness provides comfort and makes for an
The fashionable approach that disquiets Taheri has its origins in
easier, quieter life for those who choose to remain blinded to the
good intentions. It has evolved from well-meaning liberal humanist
responsibility they must take when communicating with others in
sentiments in Britain and the United States, and stands in stark and
today s world. But it remains an illusion.
necessary contrast to the discourse of those who attack Islam as
Writing in The Sunday Times on 23 May 2004, Amir Taheri, an
barbaric or medieval or primitive, using a language that implies
Iranian Muslim writer argues that it is impossible to understand a
that Western cultures are further up the evolutionary scale than
civilisation without knowledge of the language that shapes it. He
others. This attitude derives from the superficial, but widespread,
posits this before moving on to his principal argument, which is that
Western faith in the virtues of modernity and ever-increasing
democracy as a concept is incompatible with Islam, since
progress, a social model that sees dynamic change as more
democracy as a system comes from a completely different historical
desirable than maintenance of a status quo. The problem here is that
tradition. Taheri points out that the word only started to enter Muslim
technological progress (for example, improvements in health care,
languages in the late 19th century. The terminology used in political
transport or communication systems) is equated with social
discourse, even the notion of politics itself, is radically different in
progress, so that modernity is represented as bringing with it a more
Islam from other cultures. His reasoning is thought-provoking: Islam
desirable set of attitudes and behaviours. Those societies that give
is about certainty (iqan) while democracy is about doubt. Islam
greater weight to traditional behaviour patterns are dismissed as
cannot allow people to do as they please, even in the privacy of
out-of-date and out of touch with the modern world and progress.
their bedrooms, because God is always present, all-hearing and all-
This point can be illustrated by the heated debate that has gone
seeing. There is consultation in Islam (wa shawerhum fil amr). But,
on for decades now in the West about whether the veil is an
here, consultation is about specifics only, never about the overall
instrument of female oppression or not. European and American
design of society. In democracy there is a constitution that can be
feminist activists flew to Iran in 1979, after the Revolution, to express
amended or changed. The Quran, however, is the immutable word of
their solidarity with sisters forced to wear the veil, only to discover
God, beyond amendment or change.
that many women had chosen to do so deliberately. In 2002, Cherie
50
51
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 52
Blair and Laura Bush pledged to free Afghan women from the veil. In
internet cafs in rainforests and oases, despite the perpetually
2003 the French government banned the use of headscarves among
breaking news on television channels 24 hours a day, 365 days a
Muslim schoolgirls. The veil was, in each of these cases, interpreted
year, we are less able to talk to one another than at any point in
from a non-Muslim perspective, and thereby condemned as part of a
history and certainly less able to listen and try to understand what
primitive culture. Women covered their heads in Christian Europe for
others are saying to us.
centuries; but the demise of head-covering in Europe has been
What makes this doubly ironic is that the last decades of the
interpreted through the deceptive lens of continuous modernisation.
20th century saw the spread of global English eclipsing every other
The relationship between public and private behaviour that is and
language on the planet. English has become the language of
always will be differently seen and differently negotiated in different
international business, of diplomacy, of mass communication. Millions
cultures is no longer respected when it comes to some Western
of people on every continent use English either as a primary or
attitudes to the veil. From an Islamic viewpoint, the veil is both
secondary language. Surely one might presume that this will have
symbolic and functional, serving both as a sign of femininity and as a
facilitated communication, placing the idea of international dialogue
means of preventing women from being exposed to brutal language
more in our reach. Yet if English has proved to be a useful instrument
and behaviour. But as the West looks at the burqa in horror,
in many ways, another aspect to the global English phenomenon has
meanwhile other cultures look at English football supporters with
received scant attention. Within the English-speaking world of Britain,
revulsion and ponder what social and family values such people
the United States and Australasia, interest in learning other
reflect. If the veiling of women is regarded in some places as a sign
languages, never particularly strong, has gone into sharp decline,
of a less advanced culture, so football hooliganism is regarded by
with the consequence that those nations find themselves more
others as a sign of the moral decadence of a society that has lost its
isolated from the rest of the world and less able to recognise, let
faith and its ideals.
alone appreciate, cultural differences. Indeed, it could be argued that

for all those countries, the English language has become an export
Hitting the reef
commodity, and that linguistic colonialism has replaced the 19th
In September 2002, the British Council invited me to represent the
century variety. That knowledge of English should be seen as so
UK at an event organised by the Mayor of Rome, which brought
desirable only compounds the problem; why learn another language
together on one platform intellectuals from several European
when everyone else is learning yours?
countries a year after 9/11. The title of the event was provocative: Un
The objective of learning another language has always been to
dialogo naufragato?, which translates literally into A shipwrecked
communicate with others. At times that communication has been
dialogue? or, in standard English, Has (intercultural) dialogue hit a
through literacy, through reading works written in other languages
reef? Underpinning the question was the apocalyptic notion that
and consequently being able to access the culture and history of
global dialogue had indeed foundered irrevocably, that the events of
others. More recently, the objective has been primarily verbal.
September 11 had changed the worlds consciousness, and that
Learning a language has been seen as a means of enabling people
despite the millions of words that circulate round the globe every
to talk to one another. Once linguistic competence is established, it
day, despite the communications revolution that has given us
is assumed that acquaintance with the history and culture of others
52
53
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 54
will follow. But the rise of global English and the decline of foreign
known that it could not happen. Gender, tribal and ethnic politics in
language learning means that international communication patterns
Afghanistan are complex in ways that the West cannot comprehend.
are changing. Those who have learned English in addition to their
What needs to be borne in mind is that societies evolve differently,
own language or languages are able to acquire an understanding of
and that although there may be a basis for understanding, the values
the difficulties of communicating across cultures that is not possible
of one cannot and should not be imposed upon another.
for monolingual speakers. Knowing only one language in todays
The current schism within the worldwide Anglican Church is a
world reduces our ability to become acquainted with other ways of
good example of what happens when one set of cultural
thinking and behaving. More people speaking English does nothing
assumptions, in this case the presumption that homosexuality must
to alter this state of affairs.
be universally acceptable, is rejected by other cultures. That the
The early 18th and 19th century European Orientalist scholars
American, Canadian and English churches wish to put an end to
were passionately committed to learning the ancient and modern
discrimination against homosexuals is entirely appropriate to many
languages of Asia, in order to have some greater understanding of
people within those contexts, but totally unacceptable in many
the broader cultural context. Paradoxically, colonialism inspired some
African and Asian cultures. This debate is interesting because what is
invaluable scholarship, for alongside the history of exploitation that is
at stake is no doctrinal matter, but a cultural issue. What it reveals, as
now well recognised, there was another history, that deriving from a
clearly as the debates about veiling show, is that cultural differences
genuine desire to learn more about other cultures. Today, as that
need to be acknowledged, not ignored or overruled and certainly
learning has fallen into disuse, the United Kingdom and the United
not dismissed as somehow more antiquated or even more primitive.
States will have to recruit a new generation to learn the languages of
For the underlying assumption of such terminology is that the
those cultures that they particularly need to understand better. For
dissenting social groups will eventually catch up with the more
being able to comprehend alternative perspectives is essential for
forward-thinking modern world represented by the dominant
any dialogue. The point that Taheri is making in comparing the
cultures, if only given time. Uncomfortable though this may be to
relationship between individual human beings and the state, goes
admit to, this position can only be described as a form of cultural
well beyond linguistic difference: he argues that Islam and the West
imperialism.
have for centuries not only evolved different systems of government,
The West has placed increasing emphasis on modernity, even
based on totally different principles, but that these differences are
going so far as to equate modernity with freedom. Yet this emphasis
enshrined in language and consequently in perception. Exporting
on modernity is not without its own problems. For a start, it can lead
English to the world carries with it an assumption that values
to the loss of knowledge. In the UK, the urge to promote the new at
articulated in English can also be exported, understood and
the expense of the old has all kinds of ramifications. Many people
accepted.
deplore the practice in most British public libraries of disposing of
Yet this is plainly not the case. Despite the endless rhetoric in
books that look old-fashioned or which have not been taken out as
the Western media about the importance of establishing a genuinely
frequently as others, leaving shelves stacked only with contemporary
democratic government in Afghanistan, with full representation of all
best-sellers. This practice mirrors broader social patterns: British
social groups, this has not happened. Any historian would have
politicians, advertisers and retailers sell their products by claiming to
54
55
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 56
offer benefits for the future through improvements over the past.
negative, for it serves to remind us of the importance of difference in
The adjectives new, improved, better and better than ever are
our multifaceted world. We need to negotiate difference, but in order
strewn through magazines, advertisements, consultation papers and
to begin the process of negotiation we first have to recognise that
government documents in equal measure. But the obsession with
differences exist and learn to value them. Homogenising, whether
modernity is by no means universal. Other cultures value traditional
through the lingua franca that some claim English has become, or
practices, and view the present through eyes that are trained also on
through the transmission of the same image in global news bulletins
the past, seeking continuity.
on television channels across the world, does not help
Knowledge of more than one language soon exposes the fallacy
communication. Yet until recently there has been an anxiety about
of universal claims. Of course the human body suffers pain, hunger,
highlighting difference, perhaps because of the residual belief that
joy and grief everywhere in the world, but how those emotions
once differences are established, they will be instantly hierarchised,
manifest themselves, how they are internalised and then narrated is
with someone always in a superior position.
not universal. In the West, we have a binary ethical code that divides
In his novel, Things Fall Apart, Chinua Achebe draws a picture
good from evil; other cultures have systems that organise their
that consciously fills in the gaps left by Joseph Conrad in his
ethics differently. Some languages have terms for complex kinship
portrayal of Africa in Heart of Darkness. Through the narration of his
systems, and can distinguish cousins on the mothers side several
protagonist Marlow, Conrad paints a frightening portrait of the dark
stages removed; while English resorts to the phrase in-law and does
impulses that underpin colonialism. The novel is written from a
not even have words to differentiate maternal and paternal blood
European perspective; the African inhabitants are mysterious,
relatives. Some languages have sophisticated abstract terms for
shadow-like, sinister. Achebes novel starts from the opposite point of
states of mind, while others do not.
view, from that of the African village community into which white
Different languages have different colour spectrums, different
people come. In this novel, the strange, mysterious, sinister figures
concepts of tense, even different ways of visualising past, present
are the Europeans, as the fabric of the old society starts to break
and future. We see the future as before us, the past behind. Others,
down under pressure from external influences.
following the logic of the body, see the future as behind, where the
Recently, I read a number of students essays comparing these
eyes cannot see, and the past before them since it has already
novels, and was impressed by the sensitivity and sophistication that
happened and therefore can still be seen. With so many linguistic
young people could bring to their reading. What they could see
differences, we ought to live in a state of heightened awareness in
clearly were the conflicting moral positions of both writers, and by
this age of mass communication. Instead, CNN embodies a
looking at these two very differently written works, they were able to
communication gap, yawning over an apology born in one context,
negotiate layers of signification and find ways of relating that
but unacceptable to another.
negotiation to their own time. Both Conrad and Achebe, in different

ways and at different times, recognised the need for a broader, more
Bridging the gap
pluralistic perspective; and todays students, by setting these novels
In my contribution to the Rome seminar, I argued that the gap that
side by side, are learning about difference and about negotiation.
certainly exists between cultures need not be seen as wholly
They are also learning about history, in this case the history of
56
57
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 58
colonialism, and the need to continue to keep the past under
witnessing a huge popular upsurge of interest in history, in
negotiation.
publishing, film and television. I see this as a hopeful sign, as an
Societies that focus too much on modernity run the risk of
indication of the strength of grass-roots impulses as people strive to
forgetting their own past. Ironically in an age when more people than
understand more about themselves and about others. For history is
ever before are literate, cultural amnesia is a growing phenomenon.
intimately connected to identity, and identity is in turn intimately
Sometimes temporary amnesia is an important part of regeneration:
connected to language.
China needs to move on beyond the horrors of the cultural

revolution, while other states need to move on beyond civil wars,
Back to religious faith
totalitarian regimes, military occupation or genocide. To dwell on
Taheri complains about what he describes as the everything-is-
horrors that have occurred at the expense of building the new is
equal-to-everything-else fashion of postmodernist multiculturalism
counterproductive. Cultural amnesia, or selective remembering,
and political correctness. Such thinking, he suggests, prevents us
enables societies to rethink themselves, to airbrush out difficult
from acknowledging differences and acknowledging that there might
decades or even centuries, and to represent themselves anew to the
be some differences that are irreconcilable.
world. But it is also important, when the time is right, for the past to
For genuine dialogue between civilisations to happen, there
be reinstated in some way, reassessed and re-examined, so that the
must be clarity on all sides, and that clarity is as much about
present makes more sense, and lessons are applied as people move
knowing who we are as about knowing who the other is. To know
into the future.
who we are means understanding from whence we have come.
Britain, Australia and the United States have some
Understanding more about ourselves is a good starting point from
uncomfortable history to confront. It is hard to come to terms with
which to begin learning about others and to negotiate differences
the story of slavery and the racial apartheid that continued in the
that may be unbridgeable.
United States for so long; the abomination and brutality of the West
Wherever we find irreconcilable difference, precisely there we
Indian plantations; the history of the British in India; the carving up of
may find the beginnings of a new understanding. Take the difference
Africa without regard for tribal homelands; the treatment of
prominent in our world today, over the value or otherwise of
aboriginal peoples and countless other examples of discrimination
martyrdom. Although Christianity still venerates the early Christian
and prejudice. Apologies have been made publicly, though given our
martyrs prepared to die for their beliefs centuries ago, today those
earlier discussion of the two-stage process involved, the value of
men and women who opt for martyrdom, be they Islamic or Sikh or
such gestures is questionable.
Christian fundamentalist remain outside Western comprehension.
A better way to apologise to the dead is to listen to the living,
Every so often, someone advances the hypothesis that those
endeavouring to understand the historical processes and contexts
seeking martyrdom come from deprived backgrounds and that more
that led to the events we now struggle to comprehend and atone for.
poverty relief will solve the problem. Others offer pragmatic
Admittedly, history is strangely taught today, particularly in Britain,
solutions: solve x or y political situation such as Palestine or
where it is not even part of the national curriculum in schools. But
Chechnya, and the desirability of martyrdom will fade away.
perhaps as a reaction against this marginalisation, we are currently
58
59
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 60
Such arguments are typically European in that they are based
patently false. Knowledge of different languages is a first step,
on reason. The rational approach invites us to look at the broader
because then we can begin to grasp the immense differences
picture and seek an explanation that has a clear social cause. But
between cultures, and start to explore ways of building bridges.
what remains missing is the cultural significance of martyrdom in

some specific geographical and ideological contexts. The men who
Intercultural awareness training
flew the planes on 9/11 were not from deprived homes; nor were
It is ridiculously Utopian to suppose that by reintroducing foreign
they driven by any single specific political cause. Suicide bombers in
language study in schools we shall transform our world. What we can
South-East Asia do not act as they do because the Russians have not
do, however, is to promote the message of cultural difference in a
found a satisfactory solution to unrest in Chechnya.
positive manner, abandoning the misleading idea that all cultures are
The West, with its belief in reason and its desire for continuous
progress is failing at the present time to deal with the importance of
religious faith still an immensely powerful force in the lives of
fundamentally the same, but not falling into the trap of claiming the
superiority of one cultural system over another.
We need to train future generations to become more aware of
millions. Part of the process of thinking about why death should
difference, to take pride in their own identity while reaching out to
present any kind of option for many well-educated young people in
others without prejudice or implicit belief in their own superiority.
todays world, will involve looking at why so many people, particularly
What is termed in the jargon intercultural awareness training should
in Britain, are so uncomfortable with religion. The fact that both the
be an intrinsic part of education at all levels, and this should mean
British Prime Minister and the US President are church-going
much more than simply recognising the need for different politeness
Christians is often the subject of satire and derision, rather than a
strategies in different contexts or learning how to ask for a cup of
cause for celebration. Yet, at the same time, both left and right
coffee in another language. It should entail exploring differences in
deplore what they see as the collapse of community and family
conceptualising the world between different cultures considering
values in society in general. Is this not a great contradiction that
such questions as how different peoples view the significance of
deserves exploring?
individuality versus the authority of the family; the role of the state in
I am not suggesting that the way forward is for the mass
private life; the importance of religious faith and the presence of God
reinstatement of formalised religion, nor that the study of history will
in daily life; the meaning of history in the shaping of identity; and the
necessarily improve international understanding. What I am
importance of place and the values attached to life and to death.
suggesting is that in order for us to move the dialogue forward, we
The easiest place to start may be through an exploration of the
need to understand more about our own societies, about where we
differences between languages. Once we can all understand why
have come from and why such great changes have taken place in
President Bushs apology was so badly received in many parts of the
such a short time, and we need also to be more aware of the
world, why saying sorry was not felt to be adequate because it was
difference between how we see the world and how others see it.
seen to be a statement of arrogance rather than of humility, we can
Simply assuming that we are communicating perfectly because other
start to engage in a type of dialogue that has less likelihood of being
people speak a version of English is dangerous, because it is
shipwrecked during the voyage.
premised on an assumption of sameness between cultures that is
60
61
2/10/04
3:08 am
Page 62
Contributors
Mary Louise Pratt is Silver Professor of Spanish and Portuguese
and modern languages. She is well-known for her journalism and
Language and Literature at New York University, and a graduate of
media work, and is currently director of a three-year Arts and
the University of Toronto and Stanford University. She is author of
Humanities Research Board-funded project on The Cultural Politics
Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse (1978) and
and Economics of Language and Translation in Global Media. She
Imperial Eyes (1992), and co-author of Linguistics for Students of
takes a keen interest in regional and national policy for the arts, and
Literature (1980) and Women, Culture and Politics in Latin America
chairs the board of the Warwick Arts Centre. She has four children
(1990). Her current work concerns the social imaginaries of neo-
and a baby grandson and lives in North Warwickshire with
liberalism and the emergence of planetary thought. She is also
numerous animals.
writing on language policy in relation to global mobilities and the

changing faces of multilingualism. Formerly Olive H. Palmer Professor
Nick Wadham-Smith is Deputy Director of Counterpoint, the British
of Humanities at Stanford University, she participated for many years
Councils cultural relations think tank in London. In the 1970s he
in debates there about US multiculturalism.
studied with the cultural theorist Terry Eagleton, and has a longstanding interest in the relationship between culture and society.
Ron G. Manley, OBE was awarded a BA, with first-class honours, in
Later, teaching English in President Sadats Egypt provided a valuable
Chemistry and Materials Science and joined the UK Ministry of
insight into intercultural education. At the British Council he founded
Defence in 1960, where he worked for more than 30 years in a
and edited the organisations international magazine focusing
range of fields related to the development of effective defensive
on comparative cultural studies of the UK, British Studies Now
measures against the use of chemical weapons. He is a Chartered
(19922003), and, in 2004, its successor, Thresholds, a publication
Chemist, Member of the Royal Society of Chemistry and a Chartered
for professionals working across cultures. Conferences for the British
Member of the Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. He joined
Council include Re-inventing Britain, 1997, (developed with Homi K.
the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) in
Bhabha) and Looking into England, 1999, (with Susan Bassnett), the
1993 and served with the Organisation until his retirement at the end
seminar series, Representing Cultures, and Connecting Flights, new
of 2001. During that time, he held the posts of Head of the Chemical
cultures of the diaspora, a collaboration with Arts Council England.
Demilitarisation Branch (199397), Special Adviser to the Director-
He is director of Eye to Eye, the first global cultural relations
General of the OPCW (19972000), and Director of the Verification
conference, to be held in London in November 2004, and co-author,
Division (200001). He is currently a freelance consultant on arms
with Martin Rose, of Mutuality, Trust & Cultural Relations (2004).
control and chemical and biological warfare issues.

Susan Bassnett is Professor in the Centre for Translation and
Comparative Cultural Studies at the University of Warwick. She is a
world expert in the field of translation and intercultural studies,
author of the international best-seller Translation Studies, and has
also published extensively in comparative literature, theatre studies
62
63
2/10/04
This collection of essays is one of ten celebrating

the British Councils 70th anniversary by examining
some of the most critical issues for the future of
cultural relations. A wide range of thinkers
provides provocative and stimulating visions of
the power and importance of cultural relations in
the 21st century. They dont look for agreement;
their aim, and ours, is to encourage debate and
cut new channels for dialogue.
What does this well-used phrase actually mean?

Is cultural dialogue a mandarin business of
intellectual comparison and synthesis; a
structured and primarily intellectual conversation
that examines the mechanics of interaction
between high cultures? Or is it the business of
retail interaction in a world where individuals
at all levels of society, articulate and inarticulate,
educated and uneducated, pious and secular, are
thrown together more and more? Or both?
5.00
3:08 am
Page i
Counterpoint
The cultural relations think tank
of the British Council
[email protected]
www.counterpoint-online.org
Birthday Counterpoints

Intercultural Dialogue4 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Intercultural Dialogue4 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Intercultural Dialogue4 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

R062_ Intercultural Dialogue

This collection of essays is one of ten celebrating

What does this well-used phrase actually mean?

Mary Louise Pratt, Ron G. Manley, Susan Bassnett

R062_ Intercultural Dialogue

British Council 70th anniversary

Mary Louise Pratt, Ron G. Manley, Susan Bassnett

David Throsby, Issiaka-Prosper Laly

Introduction by Fiona Bartels-Ellis

Growing a bigger Europe

Introduction by Nick Wadham-Smith

Mary Kaldor, Paul Vallely

Introduction by James Kennedy

Faith and secularism

Ahmed Mohammed Abdalla,

Introduction by Anshuman Mondal

Trust me, Im a scientist

Introduction by Lloyd Anderson

Identities on the move

Introduction by Martin Rose

Do human rights travel?

Introduction by Chris Rawlings

R062_ Intercultural Dialogue

First published 2004

Building an International organisation

British Council 2004 Design Department/R062/XXX

R062_ Intercultural Dialogue

The British Council seeks to build long-term relationships between

fed up with hearing us talk. What it wants is for us to shut up and

people of different cultures. Our currency is trust. The British Council

listen. Listening and demonstrating our commitment to the free and

has been a leader in cultural relations since its founding in 1934.

creative interplay of ideas is an indispensable pre-condition for

In order to celebrate our 70th anniversary, I asked Counterpoint, our

think tank on cultural relations, to commission a series of ten sets

To build trust we must engage in effective, open dialogue.

of essays, each set looking at a central issue from a variety of angles

Increased mutual understanding based on trust, whether we agree

and viewpoints. The issues range from European enlargement to

or disagree, is a precious outcome.

Britishness, and from the significance of death to the role of faith

David Green KCMG

Our intention is to stimulate debate rather than arrive at

R062_ Intercultural Dialogue

challenge and determines the appropriate solution. With OPCW, it

Among weapons of mass destruction, chemical weapons occupy a

Manley relates how candidates were found and selected,

infrastructure of their societies mainly intact. Their victims, who are

observing in passing how the application form was interpreted and

completed in different cultures. We glimpse individuals, plucked

hospitals and homes remain standing to be resettled or left empty.

from their positions within existing hierarchies, operating in the

These weapons are profoundly anti-human: the weapon of choice for

altogether flatter terrain of the new context. Vital training needs

arose: the analytical chemists, for example, were provided with

The essays in this volume by two distinguished thinkers about

extensive training in the collection and analysis of samples in the

language and communication across cultures, Susan Bassnett and

field and the procedures necessary to ensure their integrity and