Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
5 pages
1 file
Introduction Learning is a change in behavior or having the capacity to capacity to change in a certain manner after practicing of after gaining an experience (Gibbony,2006).Behavioral, cognitive and humanistic theories are some are some of the learning theories in relation to education. A teacher can use one or a combination of the theoretical approaches to enhance learning in the learning environment. Behavioral learning theory Behaviorists focused on learning which was affected by changes in behavior because they believed that only observable, measurable, outward behavior is worthy of scientific inquiry which led to the conclusion that all students given the right environment are able to have similar understanding (Weeger and Diego, 2012).The theory of behavioral learning also contends that repetitive reinforcements whether positive or negative are essential to the learning processes The teachers duty according to behaviorists learning theory is to use reinforcement either positive or negative to strengthen or reward the wanted behavior while the negative to punish or end the unwanted behavior (Salvin, 2003). Students are required to respond actively as a responder for example, following an occurrence of the desirable behavior like high grades for effort in assessment or presentation of negative stimulus following unwanted behavior like students fail for plagiarized work (Learn and Signer, 2010).The students will more likely to work harder because they know they will receive a desired reward for their work. This theory is meant to ensure that the students have rapid and decisive response when dealing various strains of diseases in a more notable manner to effect an incisive outcome. Constructivist learning theory Constructivist view learning as search for meaning because they believed that knowledge is constructed by the learner and the learner develops his or her own understanding through experiences. They are used on observation and scientific study about how people learn and construct their own understanding and knowledge of the world by experiencing things and reflecting on those experiences. Constructivist teachers therefore encourage students to constantly assess how the activity is helping them gain understanding. By questioning themselves and their strategies students in the constructionist classroom ideally become expert learners. Teacher's role is to encourage this learning and reflection process. For example groups of students in clinical medicine class are discussing a problem in anatomy; though the teacher knows the answer to the problem she focusses on helping the students restate their questions in useful ways. She prompts each student to reflect and examine his or her knowledge. Constructivist teacher provides tools like problem solving and inquiry based learning activities the students formulate and test their ideas, draw conclusions and inferences and convey their knowledge in collaborative learning (Tobias and Duffy, 2009).The implicit role alluded by the constructivist learning theory is to remit opportunities for students to handle the hectic circumstances in case diagnosis and management, in order to explore the associated ramifications to further their knowledge and skills. Cognitive theory of learning Cognitive theorist believes that learning involves the integration of events in active storage system comprised of organizational structures which are termed as schema (Tobias and Duff, 2009). Individuals interact by their world by constantly collecting and organizing information. The cognitive theory also contends that people are in control of their own learning and as we organize the information in the brain
Cognitive Approach in the Process of Learning Studies related to how a person learns and how learning can be efficient have a long history. Various theories and approaches have been developed in this field and they have had important impact on endeavors for learning. Pedagogues make a classification based on three basic approaches while dealing with learning theories. These are behaviorist approach, cognitive approach and constructivism. It will be a mistake to see these three approaches as alternative to each one or to evaluate them independently while making a classification. Behaviorist, cognitive and constructivist ideas and principles overlap in many fields . It is difficult to classify these theories in this context. Some theories can be involved in more than one class in different ways. For example; in some resources, Bruner’s theory of Discovery Learning is accepted to be cognitive rather than developmental. In some other resources, Bruner is mostly included in developmental or constructivist class. On the other hand, while Albert Bandura is mostly classified as behaviorist, Bandura himself opposes to behaviorism. This difficulty in classification is natural. Because it is impossible to make a statement independent of behaviorist approach while dealing with cognitive approach or to make a statement independent of cognitive approach while handling constructivist approach. In other words, behaviorist approach provided a basis passing to cognitive approach while cognitive approach provided a basis passing to constructivist approach. According to this, cognitive approach does not deny behaviorism, it claims that cognitive process is seen in behaviorist learning. Moreover, constructivist approach established its principles on the basis of the principles of cognitive approach. According to behaviorist approach, learning depends on stimulus and response to a stimulus, and the resulting behaviour should be observable and measurable. While passing from behaviorist approach to cognitive approach, the question if cognitive process is present or not in acquiring behaviour started to be asked. We cannot say that cognitive psychologists completely exclude the findings of behaviorists. Cognitive processes and activities such as processing information, mental representations, guesses and expectations are accepted to be a basis in the interpretation of learning. What cognitive theorists do in addition to behaviorists’ findings is that they claim cognitive processes are also present in the events of an organism’s learning. In this chapter, cognitive approach is explained while the theories below are also included considering learning theories, which are explained, in separate chapters in the book.
2021
In reality, there is a hard debate among instructional practical applies behaviorism learning theory approach, instructional practical apply cognitivism and constructivism learning theory approach until nowadays. The implication of instructional practical becomes extreme and exclusive opinion for followers. They are Instructional practitioners, developers, and scientists that support one approach or another, or apply alternative ways. Some instructional experts have the opinion that behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism can’t be integrated or mixed because behaviorism is different from cognitivism or constructivism. Applying those theories as one unit integrated is a big mistake. But, so there is the instructional expert who has the opposite opinion, that describes the third of learning theories as one unit that can be integrated, and able to apply in one instructional practically, as learning event is a complex process that needs multiply perspective approach. Which one o...
British Journal of Educational Technology, 2002
In the old times it was thought that to have someone learn to swim it was enough to push him/her into the water, and he/she would learn how to swim. This method was not that successful, and those who had learned swimming this way, seem to have a bitter taste about their experience, which would stay with them and refreshed whenever they see water.
THEORIES OF LEARNING Supporting statement: The genesis of this diagram started as an idea of viewing different theories/models of learning visually and also to ascertain if there were any connections between some of the theories. This diagram might be used as a teaching and/or learning resource (in conjunction with the ‘Assignments and Learning Theories’ learning resource) for those who are related to the areas of education, though not necessarily in the field of education. Thus I envisage those who are involved in teaching and learning in other fields such as clinical medicine, professions, the sciences and the arts and humanities may also be interested. Needless to say, the possible connections are based on my perceptions and thus others may offer varying opinions, which are understandable. I initially used Tusting and Barton’s Models of adult learning: a literature review (2003) as a generic source of learning theories and built on from there. Of course, there are also other generic sources on learning theories such as Illeris (2007) and Jarvis (2010), which I have referred to. I would be grateful for any comments in order to develop this diagram further. Sai. Nov. 2018 Sai Loo (廬世胤) (BSc, MA, PhD, FETC, ACA, FHEA) UCL Institute of Education, University College London e-mail: [email protected] https://ucl.academia.edu/SaiLoo https://www.routledge.com/authors/i15172-sai-loo
Prospects, 1995
When we observe the teaching or mediation of science, three main traditions may be discerned. The first tradition, which is the most widespread and long established, is founded on the idea of frontal transmission of knowledge. Each stage in the process introduces specific subject matter, taken from a syllabus or table of objectives, that in sum makes up the knowledge to be acquired. In this type of teaching or mediation there is a linear relationship between the teacher, the repository of a body of knowledge, who delivers an increasingly often illustrated lecture, and the pupil on the receiving end. In museums, this tradition is reflected in a 'bookish' presentation or in the presentation of a 'medium'. In every case a 'person who knows' pours out a predetermined package of knowledge to a passive listener. At school, this transmission of information is reinforced by a corresponding effort of memorization. The second tradition, developed since the 1950s, is based on a training process upgraded to the rank of learning principle. The chosen propositions are of the stimulus-response type, and faith is pinned on ideas of 'conditioning' and 'reinforcement'. The teacher, or most commonly the programme designer, analyses the behaviour, the chaining of which expresses the skills to be acquired. He or she then devises questions capable of bringing those skills into the open and couples the replies of the pupil with approving or disapproving reinforcement stimuli. In practice, this tradition takes the form of teaching through exercises. In museums, it is reflected in the widespread 'push-button' trend. Programmed teaching of this sort has been given a new lease of life with the development of computers. Lastly, the third tradition, of more recent origin, 1 corresponds to what is generally called 'the discovery method' or 'learning by construction'. It responds to the spontaneous needs and interests of the pupils; it advocates their freedom of expression, creativity and life skills; it highlights independent discovery and the importance of proceeding by trial and error in a process of construction initiated by the pupil.
2015
Constructivism represents one of the big ideas in education. Its implications for how teachers teach and learn to teach are enormous. If our efforts in reforming education for all students are to succeed, then we must focus on students. To date, a focus on student-centered learning may well be the most important contribution of constructivism. This article, therefore, discusses constructivism learning theory as a paradigm for teaching and learning. Constructivism is a learning theory found in psychology which explains how people might acquire knowledge and learn. It therefore has direct application to education. The theory suggests that humans construct knowledge and meaning from their experiences. Conceptual understanding of the theory was discussed as well as basic characteristics of constructivists learning environment. Seven pedagogical goals of constructivist learning environments and six benefits of constructivism were outlined in this article. Significant differences between ...
Acta orientalia Vilnensia, 2004
The article focuses on the nature of the Bharata Nii!yam style of classical Indian dance as a form of worship, analyzing its relation with the environment of a Hindu temple. Linear parallels are drawn between the traditional repertoire of the Bharata Nii!yam recital and the process of going to the temple. The ontological relation between the dance and the temple as well as the link between the intemal space of the dance and that of the temple are also analyzed.
Journal of Motor Behavior, 2014
Universum Revista De Humanidades Y Ciencias Sociales, 2006
Dirāsāt Hispānicas. Tunisian Journal of Hispanic Studies, 2023
2017 UBT International Conference, 2017
Wideo w sztukach wizualnych, red. R. W. Kluszczyński, T. Załuski, Wydawnictwo UŁ i Galeria Labirynt, Łódź – Lubin 2018
IEEE Access, 2021
Clinics and Practice
Frontiers in Immunology
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2009
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2020
Quantification: A Cross-Linguistic …, 2008
Pression de la roche en profondeur : une question de poids, mais pas uniquement !, 2019