THE LOUISIANA SCHOOL: ON THE FUTURE OF A REGIONAL VERNACULAR
1
The Louisiana School: On the Future of a Regional
Vernacular
WILLIAM T. WILLOUGHBY Louisiana Tech University
Abstract
This essay introduces a collection of architects
practicing in Louisiana who work in a growing
context of franchised sprawl and struggle to
make a relevant future from the remains of
Louisiana’s vibrant regional culture. A small
cross-section of talented architects have taken
pre-engineered metal buildings, the trailer
home, and off-the-shelf materials from Home
Depot™ as overt emblems of ‘the new’ and
merged these items with the vestiges of
Louisiana’s rich architectural heritage. Their
architecture is not nostalgic, but hopeful and
forward-looking in gaze. This question is
addressed:
What
makes
this
work
representative of the future of Louisiana’s
unique regional architecture?
“In a good season one trusts life; in a bad
season one only hopes. But they are of the
same
essence:
they
are
the
mind’s
indispensible relationship with other minds,
with the world, and with time. Without trust, a
person lives, but not a human life; without
hope, a person dies.”— Ursula K. LeGuin1
A sense of the folk has never left
Louisiana. A folksy manner pervades the food,
the dress, the language, the music, and the
architecture. Place-bound traditions make up
the mettle of the Louisianan’s identity. As
native Carl A. Brasseaux can testify to, “Some
folks might consider us to be rooted losers. But
I think there is a quality of life here that is
unsurpassed.”2
A constituency of architects practicing
in Louisiana today has tapped into a vernacular
sensibility discovered in farm buildings of the
Mississippi Delta, log-hewn dog-trots in the
piney hills of north Louisiana, grand plantation
homes along River Road, shotgun houses of
New Orleans, and raised boat houses built by
Creoles and Acadians in the Atchafalaya basin.
These architects have taken Louisiana's
regional mixture and alloyed it with the
contemporary landscape of Texacos, WalMarts, and truck stops evident along the
interstates girdling Louisiana. Two landscapes
fused into singular architectural expressions:
the commercial present creolized with the
culturally-engrained past.
The excess of inexpensive, globally
available products obliterates the choice to use
local materials exclusively. The wide-scale
transporting of goods by cargo ship, tractortrailer, and commercial distribution systems
encourages monolithic economies that focus on
producing a single product, agricultural good,
or resource for export. In order to specialize,
places forfeit their regional diversity and must
now depend on imports to replace what they
no longer produce locally. But as of yet there
remains a stalwart preference in Louisiana for
the locale’s bounty and a distain for items from
outside the region.
No doubt, much has been written
about Louisiana and its fragile architectural
legacy—especially in light of the ravaging of
New Orleans and the Gulf Coast by hurricanes
Katrina and Rita. Since those disastrous events
in 2005 there has been a rush of proposed
architectures and visions for Louisiana’s Gulf
coast—How do these visions of reconstruction
offer continuity with the past, and how will
they harmonize with Louisiana’s architectural
heritage? Beyond the return of the people, the
food, and the music of Louisiana—the heritage
of vernacular building must return also.
Three practitioners and two firms—five
practices overall (Stephen Atkinson, Robert
Fakelmann, Emery/McClure, Ashe Broussard
Weinzettle, and W. Geoff Gjerston)—constitute
2
THE LOUISIANA SCHOOL: ON THE FUTURE OF A REGIONAL VERNACULAR
what can be termed a Louisiana School. The
work of this Louisiana School is not
disenchanted with industrialization or corporate
globalization; their designs simply affirm the
architectural identity of a land, a climate and a
culture as first and foremost in creating a
practical
expression
for
Louisiana.
The
Louisiana School architects value examples
from their local vernacular as much as
international
examples
of
contemporary
regionalist architecture. In these five examples
of their work, a selective synthesis is sought—
a fit that fulfils the continuities of place and the
realities of the current global economic scene.
Their architecture can be considered the
newest emblems of this locale—their buildings
are champions of place.
The Louisiana School
“Simplicity,
sincerity,
repose,
directness, and frankness are moral qualities
as essential to good architecture as to good
[people]. All the culture derived from the study
of existing buildings, foreign or otherwise,
which reflect these qualities, will not enable us
to reproduce them, unless we first have love of
them in ourselves; and the full recognition of
these qualities will check the tendency to
imitate foreign nations, or disregard our own
[local] characteristics and conditions.”3 —
C.F.A. Voysey (1911)
To be regional, architects must work
within regional ‘schools of thought’ that
address
particular
geographic,
climactic,
sociopolitical,
historical,
and
cultural
circumstances. If the work of this Louisiana
School is modern, then it is a realistic
modernism that begins with fundamentals:
that buildings occupy a particular piece of
ground and empirically interact with a unique
climate. It is a modernism that avoids utopias
and addresses facts found in Louisiana’s
unique microclimates. This is a modernism that
sees progress in the rediscovery and
advancement of its region.
In some way or another, each of these
Louisiana
School
architects
has
been
influenced
by
internationally
celebrated
“regional” architects—a chain of intellectual
compatriots starting with Voysey and leading
to Ostberg, Asplund, Aalto, Barragan, Murcutt,
Ando, Mockbee-Coker, Lake/Flato, Patkau, and
MacKay-Lyons. Each architect listed above has
created touching buildings attuned to their
respective culture and lands.4 The regionally-
inflected buildings of the Louisiana School
typify the connection to their particular
landscape’s timeless surround.
The work of this Louisiana School is not
a return to the past but rather a fusion
between a fallow tradition and contemporary
techniques. The historic homes and farm
buildings of Louisiana are compelling in the
way they pioneered a creolized architecture—
Indigenous traditions fused with those brought
from Spain, France, Africa, and England. This
mongrelized architectural heritage has an
impure beauty that these architect embrace.
Louisiana has never been held to the question
of purity. The region’s future, due to local
limits, flows contiguous with its past;
adaptations of former techniques merge with
material sourced internationally and the
adoption of industrial innovations.
Regional and Regionalistic
To be “regional” is to seek out a
sincere regional expression deriving organically
from
geologic,
climactic,
and
cultural
conditions—including historic responses to the
built environment. There is an innate poetry in
relating a building directly to its climate,
breezes, rain patterns, hydrology, soil, and
sun; in this way an architect translates the call
of a landscape into building.
Louisiana is a relatively flat region with
diverse hydrological and soil conditions
constituting flood plains, river deltas, and
costal marshes. Besides the subtle but hilly
uplands of north Louisiana, the only relief
along the flat line horizon are the levees
shaped around meandering rivers.
In Louisiana, the dynamic interval
between land and climate is close and
interactive. Since much of the land is flat river
delta, inland swamp, and marshy coastline,
you have places in a constant cycle of being
washed into existence or being obliterated by
wash.
Only
an
indigenously
invented
architecture could cope with such unique
climactic conditions such as hurricanes,
extraordinary
heat,
humidity,
and
soil
instability.
A frank and audacious dialogue with
climate and land characterizes the regional
approach—distinguishing
it
from
the
“regionalistic” dalliance of imitating stylized
forms and simulating the built past. To be
regional is to stress the circumstantial quirks
and tectonic solutions that differ from locale to
locale. To be regional is to make buildings
THE LOUISIANA SCHOOL: ON THE FUTURE OF A REGIONAL VERNACULAR
contiguous with a region’s ordinary ways. The
thrill for the regional architect is when their
work adds to an existent tradition, making
something
at
once
contemporary
and
contiguous with the past. Sometimes the most
prosaic alternates into the most profound.
Stephen Atkinson,
Zachary, Louisiana
Zachary
House;
Resonant
of
Louisiana,
Stephen
Atkinson’s Zachary House points back to the
timeless situation of building with the land.5 Its
appeal extends from its very connectedness to
the traditional building arts. The Zachary
House refines the ageless expression of
shelter—the folding of human life into the
land’s native order.
In Louisiana, to build with the land you
must build above it. Whether a building’s first
floor touches the ground or is raised on post
and beam foundations, it cannot help but float
above viscous soils that may just as soon
heave through super-saturation, wash away,
or sink due to long-term drought. Buildings in
Louisiana, dance like boats upon an ever
shifting land; foundations are continuously
adjusted—floors are re-leveled, jacked-up, and
shimmed beneath.
The Zachary House, like any good
example of architecture, serves as an
intercession between culture and nature—and
thereby evokes all the potential meanings that
arise when human culture emerges from a
place. The house is not named for its owners
but rather for the place it occupies. The house
is a possession of the locale. Zachary,
Louisiana is north of Baton Rouge; a landscape
crossed by a strata that geologists classify as
prairie. The mildly undulating terrain is
populated by pines and deciduous trees that
prefer a sandier soil. Perched on low post
foundations, the building fits into its immediate
context of grove and open field. [Figure 1]
After traversing four low brick steps that
engage a freestanding hearth, the Zachary
House frames its landscape through the open
volume dividing the house. [Figure 2]
The small retreat was designed to take
advantage of the kinds of standardized
material easily purchased at Home Depot™
and at the regional farm supply store. Stephen
Atkinson intentionally fashioned the building
from these ready made components. Materials
had to be readily purchased and assembled by
common techniques. The structure’s form is
inseparable from its tectonic simplicity. Kindred
3
to its place by both materials and building
methods, the little retreat derives its tectonic
expression from the region’s vernacular
structures. [Figure 3]
The building is more than what it is
sometimes maligned as being: a shotgun
house turned perpendicularly into a dog-trot.6
If Atkinson’s intentions were this simplistic,
then the architecture would be nothing beyond
a conceptual trope. But the small retreat
resounds as more than an intellectual folly—
the structure exudes a sensitive concomitant to
land, cultural context, and occasion.
Atkinson’s initial method was one of
careful observation of local buildings—drawing
comparisons between vernacular and genteel
structures, fixing his attention to the
differences in the way local buildings are sited
on the land, employing a sober consideration
of the building’s use as a contemplative
retreat, and then synthesizing these influences
together with timeless architectural principles
of order and proportion. In the end, Atkinson
reduced his array of local and distant
influences into a simple and unique whole that
fits its place. Like Mies’ Farnsworth House,
photographs alone won’t fully suffice. The only
way to really know the extent to which the
architecture fulfills its locale is to visit it
yourself, and then judge.
Robert Fakelmann, Louisiana Metal
Building Studies; Mississippi Delta
Region, Louisiana
Robert
Fakelmann
has
explored
Louisiana’s regionally distinct architecture for
well over a decade. On his excursions, Robert
has mapped and photographed vernacular
farm buildings in their Delta landscape.
Indicative of its simple expression, the farm
vernacular fits to the needs of the harvest.
Throughout the Delta are buildings that grow
from the land as if they were agronomic facts—
like
plantings
deeply
rooted
to
the
characteristics of climate, soil type, and place.
[Figure 4] In the northeast section of
Louisiana we see evidence of Virgil’s timeless
advice that the farmer should match human
ingenuity against the “native traits and habits
of the place, what each locale permits, and
what denies.”7
For Fakelmann, the farm buildings of
the Mississippi Delta are stark examples of
knowing how to build in a tough landscape;
their lesson is this: look closely at what has
worked here before. Robert spent many days
4
THE LOUISIANA SCHOOL: ON THE FUTURE OF A REGIONAL VERNACULAR
immersed
in
vernacular
Louisiana
architecture—sojourning,
observing,
photographing, and feeling the land these
buildings occupy. He came to appreciate the
lonely farm building in the landscape and to
question the role the pre-engineered metal
building portrays in the distinct Louisiana
climate.
As Fakelmann states, “Knowing a
‘place’ however, occurs over time. To the local
culture, the image of a familiar figure on the
landscape carries a more comprehensive
history in which social rituals and day-to-day
experiences are equally implicit.” Furthering
his point, he adds, “The colloquial landscape is
the distinctive image that accompanies seeing
a regionally distinctive building anchored in a
rural landscape – it is the ethos of a ‘place.’”8
Fakelmann supposes that the ethos of
architecture is to produce work that acts as a
resounding identifier for a distinct and
regionally explicit culture. Architecture is
evidence of humanity’s place in the world.
Fakelmann
critiques
the
contemporary
approach to standardizing buildings which
employ the same structure and same skin,
irrespective of climate or culture. This
homogenous approach to building in the United
States is something he calls a ‘nation of
standardized containers.’9 Albeit valued as
pragmatic and economical, the pre-engineered
metal building that dots the Mississippi Delta
disregards the distinct climate, the local
culture, and the ethos of the land.
Fakelmann’s remedy is one that
considers the customization of standardized
buildings in order to fit the distinct locale in
which they will sit. He seeks to challenge the
metal building industry to consider the
evolving potential for mass-customization in
lieu of the isotropic approach of massstandardization.
In
other
words,
to
manufacture the standard pre-engineered
metal building in such away that it no longer
singularly imposes its generic presence upon a
region. Instead, the metal building can adapt
in form to fit the requirements of its
microclimate and cultural context. Fakelmann’s
work supposes to reconcile the deductive
standards for metal buildings with the
inherencies of place. [Figures 5, 6, and 7]
How might Fakelmann’s ‘reconciliatory
approach’ serve to critique the standardized
container of the temporary, but most likely
permanent, FEMA trailer and fit it into the
distinct cultural landscape of Louisiana’s Gulf
coast? The use of pre-engineered metal or
wood
construction
is
efficient
and
inexpensive—and
therefore
desirable,
ubiquitous, and inevitable in Louisiana where
frugality is a necessity. Nonetheless, the
challenge
remains:
how
to
use
premanufactured components and yet embrace
local ingenuity and fit?
Emery/McClure, ABF Barn (Arabian
horse Breeding Facility); New Roads,
Louisiana
The ABF Barn by Emery/McClure
(Ursula Emery McClure and Michael A.
McClure) takes the rural vernacular of
Louisiana as a past fact to be transformed by
contemporary
demands.
Louisiana’s
architectural heritage makes for a rich point of
departure, worthy of close observation and
sturdy enough to withstand harsh critique.
The architects describe the ABF Barn
as such:
“There is a rural Southern Louisiana
site
with
a
program
that
requires
simultaneously both rough and finite finishes
(stall and laboratory respectively). There are
two varied scales of occupants, horse and
human. Lastly, there exists the loaded
architectural ‘breed’: BARN. The BARN breed is
both a normative condition, and a pragmatic
necessity. These origins must be synthesized
into a unique environment. They become
stories that tell not only the present and the
past, but also allow for the future.”10
This project takes site, climate, and the
tectonic of the normative horse barn as an
initial fact. [Figure 8] This acceptance of the
barn’s familiar tectonic expression roots the
building immediately to its locale and culture.
Demonstrated in parallel section cuts, the ABF
barn transforms procedurally as the demands
imposed by the dichotomous program deform
each structural bay of the initial unadulterated
barn form. [Figure 9; four sequential
section cuts] Not only sensibly aware of the
connection of their work to its unique south
Louisiana context, these architects are also
attuned to global trends in architectural
practice. Their work is reconciliatory; reflecting
on the inherencies of place and historical
continuity, and then sticking them through the
contemporary wringer.
This phase of Emery/McClure’s work
derives from an axiomatic interpretation of
Kenneth Frampton’s assessment of critical
THE LOUISIANA SCHOOL: ON THE FUTURE OF A REGIONAL VERNACULAR
regionalism: keep what is innate to a region
and a culture (or suppose the persistent and
essential components of place), critically
assess the significance, and then incorporate
the most culturally appropriate agents of
contemporary globalization.11 It is the struggle
between the economic needs of insipid
tourism, placeless interstate commerce, and
the cultural enthrall that persists in the
swamps, bayous, and honkytonks hidden
behind the cypresses of Louisiana.
Louisianans are fiercely possessive of
their culture; change is always seen askance
and through a veil of critical reserve. The
global change that other regions have readily
absorbed has been slow to take root in this
languid land. By most national economic
metrics, Louisiana measures consistently
poor—but qualitatively, its people are filled
with resolute local pride. The same corporate
franchises which have afflicted the rest of the
United States have only recently entered onto
the Louisiana landscape. As the architects have
stated, “Southern Louisiana has kept its
architectural detritus [and historical heritage].
It is a zone not separated from modernity.”12
Thus,
Louisiana
is
progressively
regressed; images of the bayou and the
interstate coexist simultaneously as agents of
tourism. Through their writings and work,
Emery/McClure presents a Louisiana that, “is
not a simplified and sanitized version of
entertainment (Disneyland) or a regressive
capsule of the past (Williamsburg, Virginia) yet
neither is it a vibrant contemporary cultural
and economic center (New York, Chicago). It is
partly all of these, and not really any of
them.”13
Whether regressive or progressive, the
Cajun character is one of adaptation to land
with a fervor unlike what may exist in other
regions. Hence the conjunctive phrase, localculture: a culture so much a part of the local
ecology as to remain inseparably bound; a
people entrenched. As Flannery O’Connor
informs us, “To know one’s self is to know
one’s region.”14
In
Emery/McClure’s
writings,
the
architects cite the words of Glenn Petre,
Louisiana filmmaker, “It’s easy to pick up and
move when the culture you know is all
McDonalds. But if you grow up the way I did,
in Louisiana, you don’t in your travels, find
anything like it. Some of it is the cuisine, but
mostly it is a mind-set.”15
Emery/McClure
recognize
the
‘Louisiana mind-set’ while at the same time
5
seek reconciliation with the contemporary
exegeses of the ‘global economic mind-set’—
which if left unchecked would neutralize the
unique flavor of Louisiana. The hope of any
critical regionalist is that Louisiana will reinvent
itself in contemporary guise only on its own
terns, not by terms imposed by outsiders.
Ashe Broussard Weinzettle, Links on
the Bayou Golf Clubhouse; Alexandria,
Louisiana
Ashe Broussard Weinzettle’s program
brief states that, “In 1998, the citizens of
Alexandria voted to build an 18-hole public golf
course, located on 173 acres of flat farmland
west of the city. They were able to incorporate
a tree-lined bayou bordering the course’s west
edge into the course.”16
Made from humble materials, and
forms reminiscent of farm out-buildings, the
architects sensitively arranged the built
ensemble to give an overall expression of
elegance and refinement. The architects took
the regional vernacular and reshaped select
elements into a distinct ensemble undeniably
Louisianan. [Figure 10]
The Clubhouse takes on the same
general plan distribution of the River Road
plantation home by elevating the main social
structure over the utilitarian cart storage and
maintenance facility. This raised landscape is
bermed and arranged to allow for its striking
roofline to be visible at a distance along the
approach drive—like a farmstead perched upon
a levee. Yet, the figure and tectonics of the
facility recalls farm structures that frequent the
prairie and pine landscape of central Louisiana.
This particular region is an agriculturally rich
landscape with slow bayous, frequent heavy
rains, and long building overhangs. [Figure
11]
In Louisiana, there is a tradition of
metal
structures,
mostly
derived
from
reconstituted oil drilling equipment, redeployed
scrap metal used in farm building construction,
and remnants from the railroad heydays. The
tin roof is a terminal solution to inevitable
roofing
problems
where
torrential
rain
alternates with sun harsh enough to bake tar
roofs brittle and crackles the surface into
something like alligator hide. The humidity,
coupled with intense sun makes for a daunting
environment—a liquid heat; like a sky-high
convection
oven
baking
and
steaming
everything inside it. So, metal structures and
seamed metal roofing make for a sensible
6
THE LOUISIANA SCHOOL: ON THE FUTURE OF A REGIONAL VERNACULAR
solution in this clime—and remain palatable (if
not preferable) to the local aesthetic
sensibilities.
A prominent portion of the facility’s Pro
Shop, the ‘tower,’ is reminiscent of a
pigeonnier—a small tower found on historic
plantations where pigeons would roost in
nesting boxes to be eaten as delicacies. Not
only does the reference to a pigeonnier reflect
the emphasis locals place upon cuisine, but
also the Pro Shop’s tower becomes a vertical
figure in the landscape. This combination of
landmark and pigeonnier compliments the
Louisianan’s sense of repose, palatial leisure,
and genteel cultivation. The clubhouse is an
unlikely amalgam of plantation home and farm
building. [Figure 12]
The architects state, “The clubhouse
draws its form from a series of cascading shed
roofs with expressed framing and ribbed metal
siding, which relates to its rural context.”17 The
building’s broken pitch roofs of varying,
overlapping slopes—ranging from steep to
slight—remind a person of ad hoc barn
structures cobbled together over time from
amalgamated lean-to additions. The site, once
open farmland, reclaims its rustic, agrarian
roots in the aesthetic of this new clubhouse.
W. Geoff Gjertson, Wedge House:
Golden
Residence;
Mandeville,
Louisiana
As a rather sensitive rendition of
dwelling, Geoff Gjerston’s Golden Residence
exemplifies the architect as reconciler of
competing demands.18 Foremost, the building
must offer all it can while remaining
economical to build—the most space for the
least expenditure. A pre-manufactured metal
building frame satisfied this need. Like the
inexpensive carports that dot the suburban and
rural landscape of Louisiana, the house’s initial
volume is constructed of a standard system
mono-slope metal frame anchored to a
concrete slab; the shed’s slope provides
enough inner height to allow for a mezzanine.
[Figure 13]
Gjertson and his client conceived of the
residence as a critique of the ubiquitous
suburban spec house. It is the unspoken
dream of many Southerners to live in a metal
building—to spare the expense of structuring a
subdivided interior; yet this whimsy is rarely
followed through to reality.
Gjertson combines old and new by
accepting antique architectural components
into the plan of the new building, connecting
the new structure back to a past. In Louisiana,
there is a deep and longstanding cultural
tradition
of
salvaging and
reusing
of
architectural components; this tactic joins the
ever practical mindset of the frugal Louisianan
with the proud sentimentality felt toward
reclaimed pieces of an ancestral home.
According to the architect, the house is
a
contemporary
recapitulation
of
the
Charleston side-porch house. The image may
seem apt, but the context and microclimate
required to generate such a comparison could
not differ more. The side porch is not entirely
unique to Charleston. The porch, generous roof
overhang, antique transomed French doors
flanking the porch, and exterior ceiling fan
make for a quintessential Louisiana space. The
combination of these porch elements, albeit
supported by steel, runs to the core of
Louisianan architecture—pointing back to the
first local adaptations of Acadian settlers.
[Figure 14]
The articulate porch space is the place
of conversation, of storytelling, of neighborly
greeting, of shucking corn and snapping beans,
and of Southern hospitality—a setting for
lemonade and sweet tea on a languid
summer’s day. In most parts of Louisiana, to
make a house without a porch is to eschew the
foundations of social propriety. It is about a
transition between inside and out that unites
the inner life of the Golden Residence to the
wetland beyond.
The porch is part of the symbolic,
spatial, and cultural legacy that persists even
in contemporary, air-conditioned architecture.
By combining these elements to compose a
porch, Gjerston accepts this spatial legacy and
intertwines the historical decorum of the
Louisiana porch with a wholly contemporary
structure.
Louisiana’s Past and Future Now
It would be rash to consider this
regional architecture as the formation of a
“style.” Nonetheless, these practitioners are
responding to a region’s traditions and clime;
yet all their tools and methods are
contemporary and personal. What is termed a
‘school’ is really no more than a collection of
like-minded individuals designing in and
occupying the same region.
Today, all regional architecture is
influenced by the published works of other
regions. What seems to translate and transfer
THE LOUISIANA SCHOOL: ON THE FUTURE OF A REGIONAL VERNACULAR
in the published work of other regionalists is
the sense of rootedness to place—a relation to
local climate and a celebration of vernacular
buildings. In these cases, the architecture
interacts with the region and figures its
histories into built form.
The site for a building, a respect for
the climate, and a reverence for the value of
the vernacular are what each of these
architects share with other regionalists from
around the world. Just as Glenn Murcutt’s very
principled and empirically derived architecture
is so implicit to its place as to be fully
Australian, so the work of these architects
comes across as championing Louisiana.
The work of the Louisiana School
demonstrates that an architect should never be
held captive to the past or enslaved by change.
To dispose of the past in favor of progress—or
to avoid progress in fear of losing touch with
one’s traditions—is to be exiled from the
present.19 Architecture should be seen as
continuity in time: a continuous flow forward
from elements of the past into present designs.
The past is prologue to the present;
and futures are made up of contemporary
yearnings. Idealizing a past that never was
(nostalgia), or a future that will never be
(utopia), eschews the only present we can
rightfully inhabit. In order to continue living,
the advice given in the quote that began this
essay was to trust life, and live with hope. So
in order to build with relevance—architects
must trust the bounty of their individual
region, configure a contemporary architecture
that continues a tradition, and press on with
hope toward the future.
Endnotes
Ursula K. LeGuin, City of Illusions (New York: Ace
Books, 1967) 168-169.
1
Carl A. Brasseaux, quoted in “Born on the Bayou
With Little Urge to Roam,” story by Blaine Harden,
The New York Times; Sept. 30, 2002.
2
C.F.A. Voysey, “The English Home,” from David
Gebhard’s Charles F. A. Voysey, Architect (Los
Angeles: Hennessey & Ingalls, Inc., 1975) 62. I
included the bracketed words as substitutions in the
original quote in order to make it more general and
less narrowly applicable to England.
3
7
A list inferred through Alan Colquhoun’s essay “The
Concept of Regionalism,” from Postcolonial Space(s);
edited by Nalbantoğlu and Wong (New York:
Princeton Architectural Press, 1997) 13-23.
4
See Stephen Atkinson and William T Willoughby,
“Between Land and Sky: Reduction in the Work of
Stephen Atkinson,” from Oz Journal 25 (Manhattan,
KS: Kansas State University College of Architecture,
Planning, and Design, 2003) 22-29. Though no
longer living in the region, Stephen Atkinson is a
native of Louisiana.
5
Stephen Atkinson was undoubtedly aware of
Steven Holl’s “Rural & Urban House Types in North
America,” Pamphlet Architecture 9 (New York:
Pamphlet Architecture, 1982).
6
I first came across this quote of Virgil in William
Bryant Logan’s Dirt: The Ecstatic Skin of the Earth
(New York: Riverhead Books, 1995) 164. Taken in
fuller context, Virgil begins his Georgics [Book I]
with these instructions, “Before we plow an
unfamiliar patch / It is well to be informed about the
winds, / About the variations in the sky, / The native
traits and habits of the place, / What each locale
permits, and what denies.”
7
Robert J. Fakelmann, “The Colloquial Landscape,”
from Architecture:Landscape; 2001 ACSA West
Central Conference Proceedings (Lawrence, Kansas:
University of Kansas Continuing Education , 2001)
238.
8
Paraphrased from Robert J. Fakelmann, “The
Colloquial Landscape,” from Architecture:Landscape;
2001 ACSA West Central Conference Proceedings
(Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas Continuing
Education , 2001) 239-241.
9
Ursula Emery McClure’s and Michael A. McClure,
Terra Viscus…Terra Accommodo: writing and building
in the hybrid tectonic nature (Self Published:
Lulu.com, 2007) 141. Information on the ABF Barn
can also be found in Batture Vol.2, No. 1 (Baton
Rouge, LA, LSU School of Architecture, 2006) 48-49.
10
Kenneth Frampton, “Towards a Critical
Regionalism: Six Points for an Architecture of
Resistance,” from The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on
Postmodern Culture, edited by Hal Foster (Seattle,
Washington: Bay Press, 1983) 16-30.
11
8
THE LOUISIANA SCHOOL: ON THE FUTURE OF A REGIONAL VERNACULAR
Ursula Emery McClure and Michael A. McClure,
“Supersaturated Solution – A Suspended Tourist
Landscape,” from Terra Viscus…Terra Accommodo:
writing and building in the hybrid tectonic nature
(Self Published: Lulu.com, 2007) 45.
12
Ursula Emery McClure and Michael A. McClure,
“Supersaturated Solution – A Suspended Tourist
Landscape,” from Terra Viscus…Terra Accommodo:
writing and building in the hybrid tectonic nature
(Self Published: Lulu.com, 2007) 47.
13
14
Flannery O’Connor, Mystery and Manners (New
York: Farrar Straus and Giroux, 1970) 35. Ursula
Emery McClure and Michael A. McClure use an
extended version of this quote in their essay,
“Supersaturated Solution – A Suspended Tourist
Landscape,” from Terra Viscus…Terra Accommodo:
writing and building in the hybrid tectonic nature
(Self Published: Lulu.com, 2007) 45.
Reported by Blaine Harden in “Born on the Bayou
With Little Urge to Roam,” The New York Times;
Sept. 30, 2002.
15
Taken from the 2006 AIA Gulf States Region Honor
Awards project brief statement on Ashe Broussard
Weinzettle’s winning entry, Links on the Bayou Golf
Clubhouse.
16
Again, taken from the 2006 AIA Gulf States Region
Honor Awards project brief statement on Ashe
Broussard Weinzettle’s winning entry, Links on the
Bayou Golf Clubhouse.
17
In 2003, Geoff Gjertson’s project won a Gulf
States Region AIA Chapter Annual Design Award.
18
This statement paraphrases Aldo van Eyck, “The
Interior of Time,” from Meaning in Architecture;
edited by Charles Jencks and George Baird (New
York: George Braziller, Inc., 1970) 171. In the essay
Aldo van Eyck states, “Architects nowadays are
pathologically addicted to change, regarding it as
something one either hinders, runs after, or, at best,
keeps up with. This I suggest, is why they tend to
sever the past from the future, with the result that
the present is rendered emotionally inaccessible—
without temporal dimension.” . . . “If the lasting
validity of humanity’s past environmental experience
(its contemporaneousness) is acknowledged, the
paralyzing conflicts between past, present, and
future” . . . “will be mitigated.” . . . “I have heard it
19
said that an architect cannot be a prisoner of
tradition in a time of change. It seems to me that an
architect cannot be a prisoner of any kind. And at no
time can he or she be a prisoner of change.”
THE LOUISIANA SCHOOL: ON THE FUTURE OF A REGIONAL VERNACULAR
1. View from field, Zachary House (courtesy of the architect)
2. View of model, Zachary House (courtesy of the architect)
3. View from grove, Zachary House (courtesy of the architect)
9
10
THE LOUISIANA SCHOOL: ON THE FUTURE OF A REGIONAL VERNACULAR
4. Mississippi Delta (Photo by Robert Fakelmann)
5. View of model; Louisiana Metal Building Studies
(courtesy of the architect)
6. Elevation; Louisiana Metal Building Studies
(courtesy of the architect)
7. Assembly of customized components; Louisiana Metal Building Studies
(courtesy of the architect)
THE LOUISIANA SCHOOL: ON THE FUTURE OF A REGIONAL VERNACULAR
8. Composite board; ABF Barn (courtesy of the architects)
9. Parallel section cuts; ABF Barn (courtesy of the architects)
11
12
THE LOUISIANA SCHOOL: ON THE FUTURE OF A REGIONAL VERNACULAR
10. View of facility; Links on the Bayou Golf Clubhouse (photo by author)
12. View; Links on the Bayou Golf Clubhouse
(photo by author)
11. View of overlapping roof slopes; Links on the
Bayou Golf Clubhouse (photo by author)
THE LOUISIANA SCHOOL: ON THE FUTURE OF A REGIONAL VERNACULAR
13. Overall View;
Wedge House: Golden Residence (courtesy of the architect, photo by Hyatt Hood)
14. View of side porch; Wedge House: Golden Residence
(courtesy of the architect, photo by Hyatt Hood)
13