Information on our 3-level structure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. What are dioxins?
1.1.
"Dioxins" refers
to a group of chlorinated organic chemicals with
similar chemical structures. Some have
harmful properties, depending on the number
and position of chlorine atoms in their
chemical structure. One of the most harmful
dioxins is known as TCDD. Some PCBs, which have similar
properties, are considered "dioxin-like". More...
1.2.
Unlike PCBs which were used
in several industrial applications, dioxins have no uses.
They are formed unintentionally and predominantly
released as byproducts of human activities
such as incineration and fuel combustion.
They are also formed in minor quantities
by natural processes such as forest fires
and volcanoes. More...
1.3.
Dioxins travel through the air
and deposit on water or land. In water,
dioxins initially bind to small particles
or plankton. On land, dioxins deposit
on plants or bind to the soil, most often
without contaminating groundwater. Animals
accumulate dioxins in
fat through their food; concentrations
increase at each step in the food chain.
More...
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. How are humans exposed to dioxins?
2.1
Over 90% of the human intake of dioxins is through food,
mainly from animal origin. The intake
is ten to hundred times higher for breast
fed babies than for adults with respect
to their body weight. In most industrialized
countries, dioxin exposure
has been reduced by almost 50% compared
to the early 90's. More...
2.2
Local populations have been accidentally
exposed to high dioxin levels, e.g. in
Seveso (Italy)
after an explosion at a chemical factory,
or in Japan and Taiwan with people eating
rice oil accidentally
contaminated with PCBs and dioxins. In the past,
some workers have also been highly exposed
to dioxins in waste incineration or chemical
plants. More...
2.3
Dioxins are slowly bio-transformed in
the body and are not easily eliminated.
They tend to accumulate in fat and
in the liver. By interacting with a cellular receptor, dioxins
can trigger biological effects such as
hormonal disturbances and alterations
in cell functions. The
mechanism of dioxin toxicity is similar
in man and other vertebrates. More...
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. What are the effects of dioxins
in laboratory animals?
3.1
Toxic dioxins may cause non-cancer
effects to animals, affecting development,
reproduction, the immune system and the
uterus. Human background exposures
in industrialized countries have sometimes
reached levels at which these effects
were seen in animals. More...
3.2 In laboratory testing, TCDD and some other
types of dioxins increase the number of
cancers in several animal
species, in both sexes. They do not initiate
cancers but promote the growth
of existing precancerous cell. More...
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. What are the effects of dioxins on
human health?
4.1
For workers accidentally exposed to the
highest doses of dioxins, studies estimate
that the risk of cancer increases
by about 40%. However, the average exposure
of the general population is much lower.
More...
4.2
Some delay in nervous system development
as well as changes of behavior were seen
in children of mothers who had been highly
exposed to dioxins and PCBs. In some cases
these effects occurred even at current
background levels.
The effects were likely due to exposure
through the placenta rather than through
breast milk. However, at least in one
case high levels of PCBs and dioxins in
breast milk were shown to affect young
children's neurobehavioural test
results. More...
4.3
Other non-cancer effects observed on adults
accidentally exposed
to high levels of toxic dioxins include: diabetes,
liver and heart diseases, skin problems
(e.g. chloracne), conjunctivitis,
fatigue, malaise and slowed nervous reactions.
More...
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. How can dioxin exposure be
linked to health effects?
5.1
The International Agency for Research
on Cancer (IARC)
of the World Health Organization
(WHO)
has proposed a model linking TCDD exposure
to cancer in humans. However, studies
on rodents show a wide variety of
dose-effect relationships.
More...
5.2
Models can not yet predict adequately
non-cancer effects in humans but
may be used to help understand the
effects observed. More...
5.3
The evaluation of risk posed by mixtures
of various dioxin types is more
complicated. A Toxic
Equivalency Factor (TEF) value
has been determined for each toxic dioxin. Using
these values, a total Toxic
Equivalent (TEQ) value can be
calculated for any dioxin mixture.
More...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Evaluation and conclusions
6.1
Dioxin levels in food, environmental samples
and breast milk have decreased over the
1990s. In most industrialized countries,
the daily
dioxin intake is currently in the
order of 1 to 3 pg
I-TEQ/kg body weight per day. More...
6.2
At very high dioxin exposure, the risk for all cancers
combined appears to increase. Non-cancer
effects include cardiovascular diseases,
diabetes and changes in blood composition.
Infants of accidentally highly exposed
mothers showed severe developmental and
neurological effects.
More...
6.3
A Tolerable Daily Intake
(TDI) of 1 to 4 pg
I-TEQ per kg body weight per day has
been established for dioxins by the World
Health Organization (WHO).
The upper limit of 4 is provisional: the
ultimate goal is to reduce human intake
levels below 1 pg
I-TEQ per kg body weight per day.
This value was derived from the lowest
doses causing adverse effects in experimental
animals, divided by a safety factor of
10. This Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI)
should be seen as an average over a life-time,
implying that this value may be exceeded
occasionally for short periods without
expected health consequences. More...
6.4
Although breast-fed infants are more exposed
to dioxins, under normal conditions the
many beneficial effects of human milk
generally outweigh the risks. Dioxin levels
in human milk have been reduced since
the early 90's. More...
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Other views
This summary is based
on the latest WHO-IPCS
"Assessment of the health risk of
dioxins: re-evaluation of the Tolerable Daily Intake
(TDI)". It is considered by most
scientists as a consensus
document and other recent scientific assessments
reach similar conclusions - click
here for some links
However, some people and
organizations put forward different views:
|
|
|
|
|
|