Papers by Nicolle Wambold
Pediatric Radiology, 2010
Background Rickets affects young infants and toddlers. However, there is a paucity of literature ... more Background Rickets affects young infants and toddlers. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding the types of fractures that occur in rachitic patients. Objective To evaluate the age of patients at which radiographically evident rickets occurs, and to characterize the age incidence and fractures that are observed in infants and toddlers with radiographically evident rickets. Materials and methods A retrospective study of children younger than 24 months was performed. Clinical data and radiographs were reviewed. Radiographs obtained within 1 month of the diagnosis were evaluated for the presence or absence of osteopenia, presence or absence of fraying–cupping, and presence and characterization of fractures. Results After exclusion criteria were applied, 45 children were included in the study. Children with rickets evident by radiograph were in the age range of 2–24 months. Fractures were present in 17.5% of the study group, exclusively in mobile infants and toddlers. Fracture types included transverse long bone fractures, anterior and anterior-lateral rib fractures, and metaphyseal fractures. All fractures occurred exclusively in patients with severe, overtly evident rickets. Conclusion Fractures occur in older infants and toddlers with overt rickets and can be seen by radiograph. Fractures do not resemble high-risk non-accidental trauma fractures.
Pediatric Radiology, 2010
Erratum to: Pediatr RadiolDOI 10.1007/s00247-009-1470-8There was an error in the presentation of ... more Erratum to: Pediatr RadiolDOI 10.1007/s00247-009-1470-8There was an error in the presentation of ethnicity data in Table 1.The percentages listed in the Nutritional column of Table 1 are calculated based on the total number of included patients with nutritional rickets. Of the 32 such patients included in our study, we had ethnicity data on 27 patients. The numerators in the column add up correctly to 27, but the percentages do not add up to 100% because they were calculated using 32 as a denominator.The authors sincerely regret any confusion caused.
Uploads
Papers by Nicolle Wambold