Fernando Galindo
Fernando Galindo, PhD in law from 1980. Chair of Philosophy of Law of the University of Zaragoza (Spain). Professor from 1985. Responsible for the research Group on Data Protection, Documentation and Multiculturalism. Postdoctoral studies in Frankfurt an Main (Germany, 1981) and Louisiana State Law Institute (USA, 1986). Joint researches between 1992 y 1993 with the Universities of Linz and Vienna (Austria), 1995 and 1996 with the Queen’s University of Belfast (UK), and from 2007 with the Federal University of Santa Catarina (Brasil). Adviser (from 1997) of the public key certification services SISCER y FESTE and several telecommunications and software firms. Organizator in october 1995 of the Workshop on “Cryptography, privacy and informative self-determination”, School of Engineering and Faculty of Law, U. of Zaragoza. Author, editor and coeditor of two hundred and fifty publications. Between them 10 books.
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8339-1788
Web of Science Researcher
ID: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/I-3064-2018
Scopus Author ID: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=24324858600
GoogleScholar ID: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=cIc_O5YAAAAJ&hl=en
DIALNET ID: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/autor?codigo=138145
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8339-1788
Web of Science Researcher
ID: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/author/record/I-3064-2018
Scopus Author ID: https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=24324858600
GoogleScholar ID: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=cIc_O5YAAAAJ&hl=en
DIALNET ID: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/autor?codigo=138145
less
Interests
Uploads
Papers by Fernando Galindo
As with any individual, the consciousness and actions of legal agents are based on their opinions and prejudices - beliefs that are acquired through education, training, work and personal experience. These are autopoietic processes and people are influenced by the social dogma of the time, place and environment in which they live. This is also true of all the other agents, experts, witnesses and people involved in finding a judicial solution to a legal conflict. The relevance of personal factors in the procedural law system is even greater when we consider that sentences should never be based solely on personal beliefs regarding the facts of the matter; they must be based on legal texts. The origin of the problem is that laws are interpreted, accessed and applied in accordance with the prejudices and opinions of those involved in the process. The final decisions or sentences that are adopted are taken as basic models for contemplation and action and are later constituted as general cases which, for reasons of efficacy, are used as references. In addition, rather than being concerned with details and particularities, the administration of justice is becoming more and more modelled and automated. This present study aims to analyse the treatment of minorities in specific cases. With the exception of emotional factors, it is an analysis which focuses on the aforementioned details and particularities.
As with any individual, the consciousness and actions of legal agents are based on their opinions and prejudices - beliefs that are acquired through education, training, work and personal experience. These are autopoietic processes and people are influenced by the social dogma of the time, place and environment in which they live. This is also true of all the other agents, experts, witnesses and people involved in finding a judicial solution to a legal conflict. The relevance of personal factors in the procedural law system is even greater when we consider that sentences should never be based solely on personal beliefs regarding the facts of the matter; they must be based on legal texts. The origin of the problem is that laws are interpreted, accessed and applied in accordance with the prejudices and opinions of those involved in the process. The final decisions or sentences that are adopted are taken as basic models for contemplation and action and are later constituted as general cases which, for reasons of efficacy, are used as references. In addition, rather than being concerned with details and particularities, the administration of justice is becoming more and more modelled and automated. This present study aims to analyse the treatment of minorities in specific cases. With the exception of emotional factors, it is an analysis which focuses on the aforementioned details and particularities.