The Philosopher as Moral Activist: A Call for Ethical Caution in Publication

Essays in Philosophy 21 (1):46-75 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is normal to think that philosophers’ first dedication is to the truth. Publishers and writers consider ideas and papers according to criteria such as originality, eloquence, interestingness, soundness, and plausibility. I suggest that moral consequence should play a greater role in our choices to publish when serious harm is at stake. One’s credence in a particular idea should be weighed against the potential consequences of the publication of one’s ideas both if one turns out to be right and if one turns out to be wrong. This activist approach to philosophical writing combines moral concern with epistemic humility.

Author's Profile

Kyle York
University of Colorado, Boulder

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-02-14

Downloads
414 (#55,297)

6 months
104 (#52,258)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?