Consistent Vegetarianism and the Suffering of Wild Animals

Journal of Practical Ethics 4 (2):94-102 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ethical consequentialist vegetarians believe that farmed animals have lives that are worse than non-existence. In this paper, I sketch out an argument that wild animals have worse lives than farmed animals, and that consistent vegetarians should therefore reduce the number of wild animals as a top priority. I consider objections to the argument, and discuss which courses of action are open to those who accept the argument.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-09

Downloads
423 (#54,192)

6 months
48 (#93,405)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?