Stanislaw Lem vs. Andrei Tarkovsky

Abstract

Tarkovsky recognizes these differences, saying that there is a contradiction with Lem's initial idea, because he was interested in the problems of inner life, spiritual problems, so to speak, and Lem was interested in the collision between man and Cosmos. In an ontological sense of the word, in the sense of the problem of knowing and the limits of this knowledge - it is about that. Lem even said that mankind was in danger, that there was a crisis of knowledge when man did not feels ... This crisis is growing, a snowball, takes the form of various human tragedies, including scientists.

Author's Profile

Nicolae Sfetcu
Romanian Academy

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-25

Downloads
349 (#63,930)

6 months
63 (#83,329)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?