The Interpretation of Classically Quantified Sentences: A set-theoretic approach

Cognitive Science 30 (4):691-723 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We present a set-theoretic model of the mental representation of classically quantified sentences (All P are Q, Some P are Q, Some P are not Q, and No P are Q). We take inclusion, exclusion, and their negations to be primitive concepts. It is shown that, although these sentences are known to have a diagrammatic expression (in the form of the Gergonne circles) which constitute a semantic representation, these concepts can also be expressed syntactically in the form of algebraic formulas. It is hypothesized that the quantified sentences have an abstract underlying representation common to the formulas and their associated sets of diagrams (models). Nine predictions are derived (three semantic, two pragmatic, and four mixed) regarding people's assessment of how well each of the five diagrams expresses the meaning of each of the quantified sentences. The results from three experiments, using Gergonne's circles or an adaptation of Leibniz lines as external representations, are reported and shown to support the predictions

Author Profiles

Guy Politzer
Institut Jean Nicod
Ira Noveck
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
215 (#83,272)

6 months
76 (#73,929)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?