Courage, cowardice, and Maher’s misstep

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 47 (4):565-587 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Could a Nazi soldier or terrorist be courageous? The Courage Problem asks us to answer this sort of question, and then to explain why people are reluctant to give this answer. The present paper sheds new light on the Courage Problem by examining a controversy sparked by Bill Maher, who claimed that the 9/11 terrorists’ acts were ‘not cowardly.’ It is shown that Maher's controversy is fundamentally related to the Courage Problem. Then, a unified solution to both problems is provided. This solution entails that gutsy people who lack good ends are not courageous.

Author's Profile

Brent G. Kyle
United States Air Force Academy

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-12-21

Downloads
1,152 (#13,805)

6 months
163 (#21,394)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?