Consonances Between Liberalism and Pragmatism

Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 48 (2):141-168 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to identify certain consonances between contemporary liberalism and classical pragmatism. I identify four of the most trenchant criticisms of classical liberalism presented by pragmatist figures such as James, Peirce, Dewey, Addams, and Hocking: that liberalism overemphasizes negative liberty, that it is overly individualistic, that its pluralism is suspect, that it is overly abstract. I then argue that these deficits of liberalism in its historical incarnations are being addressed by contemporary liberals. Contemporary liberals, I show, have taken on board a surprising number of classical pragmatist insights and have responded to a surprising number of classical pragmatist criticisms. I thus argue that both contemporary pragmatism and contemporary liberalism have much to gain by joining forces.

Author's Profile

Carol Hay
University of Massachusetts, Lowell

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-12

Downloads
616 (#35,501)

6 months
126 (#37,316)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?