Words That Harm: Defending the Dignity Approach to Hate Speech Regulation

Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 35 (1):31-57 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The dignity approach to racist hate speech regulation maintains that hate speech ought to be regulated because it impugns targets’ dignity and poses a threat to their equal treatment. This approach faces the significant causal challenges of showing that hate speech has the power to erode its targets’ dignity and that regulations can successfully protect that dignity. My aim is to show how a friend of the dignity approach can resolve these challenges. To do so, I borrow insights from the critical legal studies (CLS) approach to hate speech. Specifically, I argue that hate speech can erode its targets’ dignity 1) by constituting an act of discrimination, and 2) by enacting norms that call for treating targeted groups as inferior. Yet while I maintain that the CLS approach offers valuable resources for shoring up the dignity approach, I reject the CLS approach in favor of the dignity approach.

Author's Profile

Chris Bousquet
Syracuse University

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-06-08

Downloads
183 (#87,601)

6 months
70 (#78,267)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?