Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. COVID-19 and Health-Related Authority Allocation Puzzles.Michael da Silva - 2021 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (1):25-36.
    COVID-19-related controversies concerning the allocation of scarce resources, travel restrictions, and physical distancing norms each raise a foundational question: How should authority, and thus responsibility, over healthcare and public health law and policy be allocated? Each controversy raises principles that support claims by traditional wielders of authority in “federal” countries, like federal and state governments, and less traditional entities, like cities and sub-state nations. No existing principle divides “healthcare and public law and policy” into units that can be allocated in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Geographic Location and Moral Arbitrariness in the Allocation of Donated Livers.Douglas MacKay & Samuel Fitz - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (2):308-319.
    The federal system for allocating donated livers in the United States is often criticized for allowing geographic disparities in access to livers. Critics argue that such disparities are unfair on the grounds that where one lives is morally arbitrary and so should not influence one's access to donated livers. They argue instead that livers should be allocated in accordance with the equal opportunity principle, according to which US residents who are equally sick should have the same opportunity to receive a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Federalism as an institutional doctrine.Michael Da Silva - 2023 - Journal of Social Philosophy 55 (1):81-105.
    Journal of Social Philosophy, EarlyView.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation