Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Contrastive Consent and Third Party Coercion.David Enoch - 2024 - Philosophers' Imprint 24 (1).
    If Badguy threatens Goodguy with harm, and Goodguy consents to giving his money to Badguy (to avoid the harm), Goodguy’s consent is invalid because coerced. But if under Badguy’s coercive threat Goodguy proceeds to consent to paying someone else (or to hiring a bodyguard), the consent may very well be valid. The challenge is to explain this difference. In this paper I argue that the way forward is to recognize that the content of consent is contrastive – one doesn’t just (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark