Hutchings et al., 1998 - Google Patents
Strong ground motion synthesis for a M= 7.2 earthquake in the Gulf of Corinth, Greece using Empirical Greens functionsHutchings et al., 1998
View PDF- Document ID
- 2369144303243956946
- Author
- Hutchings L
- Stavrakakis G
- Ioannidou E
- Wu F
- Jarpe S
- Kasameyer P
- Publication year
External Links
Snippet
We synthesize strong ground motion at three sites from a M= 7.2 earthquake along the MW- trending Gulf of Cornith seismic zone. We model rupture along an 80 segment of the zone. The entire length of the fault, if activated at one time, can lead to an event comparable to that …
- 235000021384 green leafy vegetables 0 title abstract 2
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/003—Seismic data acquisition in general, e.g. survey design
- G01V1/005—Seismic data acquisition in general, e.g. survey design with exploration systems emitting special signals, e.g. frequency swept signals, pulse sequences or slip sweep arrangements
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
- G01V1/30—Analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
- G01V1/282—Application of seismic models, synthetic seismograms
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/16—Receiving elements for seismic signals; Arrangements or adaptations of receiving elements
- G01V1/18—Receiving elements, e.g. seismometer, geophone or torque detectors, for localised single point measurements
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/008—Earthquake measurement or prediction
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/40—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting specially adapted for well-logging
- G01V1/42—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting specially adapted for well-logging using generators in one well and receivers elsewhere or vice versa
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/02—Generating seismic energy
- G01V1/04—Details
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
- G01V2210/60—Analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
- G01V2210/30—Noise handling
- G01V2210/32—Noise reduction
- G01V2210/322—Trace stacking
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- G01V99/005—Geomodels or geomodelling, not related to particular measurements
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V11/00—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS prospecting or detecting by methods combining techniques covered by two or more of main groups G01V1/00 - G01V9/00
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
- G01V3/12—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation operating with electromagnetic waves
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Sekiguchi et al. | Fault geometry at the rupture termination of the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake | |
Hoshiba et al. | Numerical shake prediction for earthquake early warning: Data assimilation, real‐time shake mapping, and simulation of wave propagation | |
Smerzini et al. | Broadband numerical simulations in complex near‐field geological configurations: The case of the 2009 M w 6.3 L’Aquila earthquake | |
US20120123684A1 (en) | System and method for generating micro-seismic events and characterizing properties of a medium with non-linear acoustic interactions | |
Gallovič | Modeling velocity recordings of the M w 6.0 South Napa, California, earthquake: Unilateral event with weak high‐frequency directivity | |
Hutchings et al. | Application of empirical Green’s functions in earthquake source, wave propagation and strong ground motion studies | |
Hutchings et al. | A physically based strong ground-motion prediction methodology; application to PSHA and the 1999 M w= 6.0 Athens earthquake | |
Pitarka et al. | Analysis of ground motion from an underground chemical explosion | |
Anderson | Strong-motion seismology | |
Gok et al. | Effect of soil conditions on predicted ground motion: Case study from Western Anatolia, Turkey | |
Askan et al. | Assessment of seismic hazard in the Erzincan (Turkey) region: construction of local velocity models and evaluation of potential ground motions | |
Stabile et al. | A comprehensive approach for evaluating network performance in surface and borehole seismic monitoring | |
Wirth et al. | Evaluating a kinematic method for generating broadband ground motions for great subduction zone earthquakes: Application to the 2003 M w 8.3 Tokachi‐Oki earthquake | |
Lai et al. | Shallow basin structure and attenuation are key to predicting long shaking duration in Los Angeles basin | |
Bader et al. | Newtonian-noise characterization at Terziet in Limburg—the Euregio Meuse–Rhine candidate site for Einstein Telescope | |
Satoh et al. | Three-dimensional finite-difference waveform modeling of strong motions observed in the Sendai basin, Japan | |
Abraham et al. | Numerical study on basin-edge effects in the seismic response of the Gubbio valley, Central Italy | |
Qiu et al. | Analysis of fault zone resonance modes recorded by a dense seismic array across the San Jacinto fault zone at Blackburn Saddle | |
Yamashita et al. | Potency density tensor inversion of complex body waveforms with time-adaptive smoothing constraint | |
Lee et al. | Toward real-time regional earthquake simulation II: Real-time Online earthquake Simulation (ROS) of Taiwan earthquakes | |
Cirella et al. | Rupture process of the 2007 Niigata‐ken Chuetsu‐oki earthquake by non‐linear joint inversion of strong motion and GPS data | |
Asano et al. | Revisiting the source rupture process of the mainshock of the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake and implications for the generation of near‐fault ground motions and forward‐directivity pulse | |
Kano et al. | Seismic wavefield imaging of long‐period ground motion in the Tokyo metropolitan area, Japan | |
Moratto et al. | A deterministic seismic hazard analysis for shallow earthquakes in Greece | |
Del Gaudio et al. | Broad-band strong motion simulations coupling k-square kinematic source models with empirical Green's functions: the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake |