Casey et al., 1996 - Google Patents

Predictors of outcome in the quadriparetic nonambulatory myelopathic patient with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective study of 55 surgically treated Ranawat class IIIb …

Casey et al., 1996

Document ID
15093187763635099079
Author
Casey A
Crockard H
Bland J
Stevens J
Moskovich R
Ransford A
Publication year
Publication venue
Journal of neurosurgery

External Links

Snippet

✓ The functional results of surgery in patients with myelopathic nonambulatory rheumatoid arthritis (Ranawat Class IIIb) are often disappointing, with high rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. The authors therefore undertook a detailed investigation of a cohort …
Continue reading at thejns.org (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
    • A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
    • A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
    • A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
    • A61B17/7055—Spinal positioners or stabilisers; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant connected to sacrum, pelvis or skull
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
    • A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
    • A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
    • A61B17/84—Fasteners therefor or fasteners being internal fixation devices
    • A61B17/86—Threaded wires, pins or screws; Nuts therefor
    • A61B17/8695—Washers
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
    • A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
    • A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
    • A61B17/80—Cortical plates, i.e. bone plates; Instruments for holding or positioning cortical plates, or for compressing bones attached to cortical plates
    • A61B17/8033—Cortical plates, i.e. bone plates; Instruments for holding or positioning cortical plates, or for compressing bones attached to cortical plates having indirect contact with screw heads, or having contact with screw heads maintained with the aid of additional components, e.g. nuts, wedges or head covers
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
    • A61B2017/564—Methods for bone or joint treatment
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A61B5/4514—Cartilage
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A61B5/4528—Joints
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B2017/00017—Electrical control of surgical instruments
    • A61B2017/00022—Sensing or detecting at the treatment site
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/48—Other medical applications
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/41—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the immune or lymphatic systems
    • A61B5/414—Evaluating particular organs or parts of the immune or lymphatic systems
    • A61B5/417—Evaluating particular organs or parts of the immune or lymphatic systems the bone marrow
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B2505/00—Evaluating, monitoring or diagnosing in the context of a particular type of medical care
    • A61B2505/05—Surgical care

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Casey et al. Predictors of outcome in the quadriparetic nonambulatory myelopathic patient with rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective study of 55 surgically treated Ranawat class IIIb patients
Maher et al. Lateral exit-zone stenosis and lumbar radiculopathy
Nohara et al. Nationwide survey on complications of spine surgery in Japan
Murata et al. Microendoscopic decompression for lumbosacral foraminal stenosis: a novel surgical strategy based on anatomical considerations using 3D image fusion with MRI/CT
Baek et al. Postoperative longitudinal outcomes in patients with residual disc fragments after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy
Harris et al. Spinal deformity after spinal cord injury
Murata et al. Microendoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis caused by facet-joint cysts: a novel technique with a cyst-dyeing protocol and cohort comparison study
Meinig et al. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in spinal trauma in 29 consecutive patients
Liu et al. Morphology of herniated disc as a predictor for outcomes of posterior percutaneous full‐endoscopic cervical discectomy in treating cervical spondylotic radiculopathy
Epstein Surgical management of lumbar stenosis: decompression and indications for fusion
Amer et al. Minimally invasive sacroiliac fusion, a case series, and a literature review
O'Rourke et al. L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis: indications and technique for operative management.
Daentzer Operative management for atlantoaxial instability in case of bilateral high-riding vertebral artery
Wang et al. Anterior C2–3 fusion with internal fixation for unstable teardrop fracture of the axis: a retrospective cohort study
Kapetanakis et al. Full-endoscopic ventral facetectomy vs open laminectomy for lumbar lateral recess stenosis: a comparative study and brief literature review
Kawauchi et al. Myeloscopic observation of adhesive arachnoiditis in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis
Cawley et al. Natural History of IntraDiscal Vacuum Phenomenon and its role in Advanced Disc Degeneration
Wu et al. A novel classification of subaxial cervical hemivertebrae and associated surgical management
Durmaz et al. WHICH IMAGING METHOD IS MORE EFFECTIVE IN LATERAL MASS SCREW PLACEMENT: O-ARM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY OR X-RAY?
Yu et al. Uniportal Full‐endoscopic Foraminotomy for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis: Clinical Characteristics and Functional Outcomes
Yang et al. C7 Fracture as a Complication of C7 Dome-Like Laminectomy: Impact on Clinical and Radiological Outcomes and Evaluation of the Risk Factors
Somay et al. An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Surgical Treatment Methods Used for Cervical Spondylosis
Doğu Anterior One-and Two-Level Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study
Albayrak et al. Clinical and radiological comparison of surgical treatment methods in patients with cervical spinal stenosis
Duzkalir et al. Capped Dens Sign in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy