TITLE A WEARABLE MECHATRONIC DEVICE FOR THE ANALYSIS OF JOINT BIOMECHANICS DESCRIPTION Field of the invention The present invention relates to a wearable mechatronic device for the analysis of joint biomechanics and, more particularly, for monitoring the movements of body joints. More precisely, the invention relates to a device that makes it possible to measure and analyze in real time the movements of articulated body joints with one or two degrees of freedom (capable of being applied, for example, to the knee) . Background of the invention The growing interest shown in recent years by the medical and bio-engineering environment in studies of posture and locomotion has provided a strong stimulus for the development of devices and methods of acquiring and processing data and signals obtained from body parts and surfaces both in static positions and in movement. These researches also led to the construction of some items of equipment that are today extensively used even in sectors other than those of traditional bioengineering. These studies are motivated by the ever growing clinical and applicative need for advanced methods of quantitative and multi-factorial evaluation of the functional alterations associated with control of the posture and the movements. The great functional complexity of the physiological systems involved in the various pathological forms and the close operational synergy by means of which these systems contribute to the picture of the pathology have suggested the development of highly specialized measurement
instruments and protocols that, together with adequate characteristics of accuracy and precision, assure compliance with some further sectoral peculiarities: non- invasiveness, three-dimensionality, computation of specific diagnostic and prognostic parameters, maximum automation of the calculation and restitution processes, etc . Furthermore, the methods and equipment developed within the traditional medical field have assumed enormous importance also in sports medicine. Recent years, in fact, have seen sport play an ever more important part in national and international socio-economic life. The number of practitioners of sporting activities at the professional or amateur level or for the purposes of social reinsertion (sport for the handicapped, for example) has generated a process of refinement of training procedures that attach ever greater importance to the aspects of optimizing the interactions between athlete and instrument in order to maximize the final performance. A complete and accurate description of even the simplest movement calls for a large number of data: for example, describing the movement of a lower limb in the sagittal plane during walking calls for up to fifty variables (relative and/or absolute linear-angular measurements) . The relative measurements call for all the anatomical coordinates to be calculated with respect to a fixed anatomical point, while the absolute measurements require the anatomical coordinates to be related to a fixed external reference point. There exist many different systems for carrying out kinematical measurements of a biological joint. Among these one may here recall the electro-mechanical systems
comprising articulated quadrilateral devices and electrogoniometers . The latter are devices capable of detecting a single movement of rotation for each joint, so that - in the case, for example, of an essentially two- dimensional joint like the knee - there have to be installed two separate electrogoniometers, each operating on a single axis of rotation (flexion-extension axis, transverse rotation axis) . The use of these devices calls for distinct fastening systems which can result in a rather complex positioning of these devices on the patient's body without guaranteeing the necessary accuracy of the effected measurements. This problem becomes more and more complex as the number of degrees of freedom of the articulated joint increases. United States patent No. 4883069 describes an instrument for the measurement of the movement of the knee in the three reference planes . The measurement is made by means of three rotoidal potentiometers mounted on three axes positioned at 90° with respect to each other. The potentiometers are positioned on a single support (triaxial joint) placed in a lateral position with respect to the knee. The support of the potentiometers is defined by a tubular mechanical structure attached to the lower limb by means of a band-type fastening system placed upstream (femur) and downstream (tibia/thigh) of the knee. In the medical field the device is used for both therapeutic and technical-sporting uses. Although the device is triaxial, light and of limited encumbrance, the device has a single axis of rotation in line with the physiological one of the patient. As far as the remaining two axes are concerned, it carries out an indirect measurement, because these axes are not in line with the
corresponding physiological axes. Consequently, the kinematic solution adopted in this patent produces an error that becomes larger as the distance between the kinematic axis of the system and the corresponding physiological axis of the knee becomes greater.
Furthermore, the device in accordance with US 4883069 is not provided with points for direct fixing to the knee.
The fastening points are referred to the muscular parts of the lower limb. In this way the system, being devoid of objectively determinate references, is not capable of assuring that even the same patient will wear it in the same position on two successive occasions: in the absence of any direct fastening points on the knee, in fact, the positioning of the sensitive part of the device (reading system) cannot assure proper alignment with the appropriate kinematic axis of rotation. The considered system of attachment to the lower limb is constituted by a system of bands that inevitably introduces relative sliding between the mechanical system and the lower limb. Lastly, the device is not equipped with a system of alignment to anatomical parts, so that it is possible to measure only the magnitude of the rotation relative to the joint that is being examined, though without knowing the starting point, and it is not therefore possible to make comparisons between measurements made at different times. Other widely used systems are the optical ones, which are normally based on two operating principles. The first
(system of passive markers with threshold recognition) is based on the positioning on the body of the interested patient of small markers that can be recognized by an infrared rays system. A series of two or more telecameras are placed around the element in movement and capture the
markers within their field of vision. A suitable software system, using complex mathematical algorithms, performs a correlation of the various positions of the markers, resorting to different perspectives to calculate the space coordinates of each marker and exploiting the principle of redundance of the information available for each point. The optical systems of the passive-marker type with form recognition, on the other hand, make use of a single infrared telecamera capable of capturing the contours of the image of the object to be examined, which are then analyzed to determine the position of the various parts of the body and its gestures. Both methods require that there must be no disturbing elements between the transmitter and the receiver. This means that the work environment must be such as to permit these systems to be operated without any occurrence of interferences or shadow zones caused by possible discontinuities between emitter and receiver. These systems do not give rise to the typical drawback of numerous movement analysis systems that consists of the presence of connecting cables between the measuring system and the support for storing and analyzing the data. All the same, the principal difficulty associated with their use is the impossibility of maintaining the position of the markers constant at the points defined by the joint on account of the small relative movements that occur between the skin and the bone structure. Furthermore, their use calls for highly specialized personnel to process the data and implies considerable costs. The magnetic systems, of which the 3 SPACE FASTRACK device manufactured by the US firm Polhemus is an example, generally make use of a source that emits a magnetic field
and a small sensor that refers its own position and orientation with respect to the emission source. Unlike the acoustic and optical systems, these systems are not based on observations by means of the so-called "lines of sight", but metallic objects present in the work environment can distort the magnetic field and give rise to reading errors of the position of the point of which the exact spatial position is to be determined. Though the presence of one or more transmitters of small weight and size and a receiver physically connected to the central unit assures an absolute measurement of the parameter to be recorded, it is also associated with the problem of greatly limiting the movements of the subject on whom the measurements are made. Objects and summary of the invention The object of the present invention is to provide a mechatronic device that can readily be worn by the user (patient) , is simple to use for the operator (phisician) and capable of monitoring with sufficient accuracy the dynamic behaviour of a body joint such as, for example, the knee. Another aim of the present invention is to provide a wearable mechatronic device of the aforementioned type that will make it possible to read the angles of a body joint in a simple and rapid manner and with a small positioning error. Another aim of the present invention is to provide a wearable mechatronic device of the aforementioned type that will assure wide freedom of movement for the user/ patient by not making use of any cables to connect it to a central data acquisition unit.
Yet another aim of the present invention is to provide a wearable mechatronic device of the aforementioned type that will be symmetrical, i.e. can be adapted in a very brief space of time for use on both the limbs. These aims are attained by means of the wearable mechatronic device for monitoring the movements of body joints in accordance with the invention, comprising a support that can be applied to the limb comprising said joint and magnetic sensor means associated with the support and arranged on at least one axis of rotation of the joint, said means being capable of generating an electric signal of an intensity correlated with the magnitude of the angular movement around the axis of rotation. Means for positioning the magnetic sensor means on the axis of rotation are provided, said positioning means being attachable to said support in correspondence to the joint and both above and below it. In a preferred embodiment the magnetic sensor means comprise a first element carrying at least one Hall sensor and a second element, hinged to the first element around an axis and carrying at least one magnet, while the positioning means comprise a first connection for the magnetic sensor means arranged on the support in a position intermediate with respect to its two ends, so that the hinge axis can be brought into substantial alignment with the axis of rotation of the joint. Second connections are arranged upstream of and, respectively, downstream of the first connection and are connected to the first and the second element of the magnetic sensor means .
Brief description of the drawings The characteristics and advantages of the wearable mechatronic device for monitoring body joints in accordance with the invention will appear more clearly by the following description of a particular embodiment thereof, which is given by way of example and is not to be considered limitative in any way, the description making reference to the attached drawings, of which: - Figure 1 shows a perspective view of the wearable mechatronic device in accordance with the invention in an embodiment suitable for monitoring the joint of the knee; - Figure 2 shows a partly sectional plan view of the connection of the sensor unit of the system for detecting flexion-extension movements; - Figure 3 shows a side elevation views of the connection of Figure 2 as seen in the direction of the arrow F. Detailed description of the invention Referring to Figure 1, the reference number 1 indicates an elastic tubular support of the type used in common commercial knee braces intended to be applied to a lower limb at the knee joint. Fixed to the support 1 is a mechatronic structure comprising a unit for the detection of flexion-extension movements (movements of the femur- tibia joint in the sagittal plane) , generically indicated by 2, and a unit for the detection of abduction-adduction movements (movements of the femur-tibia joint in the frontal plane), generically indicated by 3. As is known, the flexion-extension movement is the rotation movement of the knee in the sagittal plane around an axis passing through the femoral epicondyles. The abduction-adduction (or varus/valgus) movement of the knee, on the other hand,
is the angular movement of the tibia with respect to the femur in the frontal plane. The two rotation axes as aforesaid are indicated in Figure 1 by, respectively, X and Y. Support 1 is provided with connection means for the two detection units 2 and 3. For unit 2 that detects the flexion-extension movement, in particular, there are provided a central connection 4 arranged in an intermediate position on support 1 and two terminal connections 5 and 6 arranged in proximity of the ends of support 1 and therefore above and below the central connection 4 in the direction of the length of support 1. Similarly, for unit 3 that detects the abduction-adduction movements there are provided a central connection 7 arranged on support 1 in an intermediate position, substantially at 90° with respect to central connection 4 provided for unit 3, and two terminal connections 8 and 9 arranged in proximity of the ends of support 1 and therefore above and below central connection 7 and substantially arranged at right angles with respect to the corresponding terminal connections 5 and 6 provided for unit 2. The central connections 4 and 7 and the terminal connections 5, 6 and 8, 9 are fixed to the support 1 in any known manner, for example by means of gluing or with screws . Central connection 7 of detection unit 3 is arranged in such a position on support 1 as to permit it to be readily positioned in coincidence with the rotula of the knee and to this end it is provided with a central opening, not visible in the figures, for visual centring of the rotula.
The relative position of central connection 4 of detection unit 2 with respect to the position of central connection 7 of detection unit 3 is such that they will be situated substantially on the tibial condyles when support 1 is worn in such a way that central connection 7 is positioned on the rotula and aligned with the axis of the varus/valgus movement . With a view to taking due account of the different morphological sizes of the various users, there is also provided a fine adjustment system to regulate the position of the sensor unit applied to him, and this will be described in greater detail further on. Fixed to the central connection 4 of unit 2 for detecting the flexion-extension movements there is a sensor unit 10a within which there are housed the movement sensors that will be described further on. Similarly, fixed to the central connection 7 of unit 3 for detecting the abduction-adduction movements there is a sensor unit 10b carrying movement sensors that will be described further on. The two units 2 and 3 for detecting the flexion- extension and abduction-adduction movements are structurally similar and in the present description only one of them will therefore be described, indicating between parentheses the reference numbers of the corresponding components of the other. Sensor unit 10a (10b) is a body made up of two parts or elements 11a, 12a (lib, 12b) rotatably connected to each other around an axis perpendicular to the plane in which they lie, this axis substantially coinciding with the axis X (Y) of the knee. In particular, element 11a (lib) has a substantially C-shaped part within which element 12a (12b) is engaged. From the two elements 11a,
12a (lib, 12b) of sensor unit 10a (10b) there extend respective longitudinal appendices 13a, 14a (13b, 14b) engaging with the corresponding fork-shaped ends 15a, 16a (15b, 16b) of two rods 17a, 18a (17b, 18b) . Appendices 13a, 14a (13b, 14b) are rotatably connected to fork-shaped ends 15a, 16a (15b, 16b) around axes coplanar with the plane in which there lies sensor 10a (10b) and perpendicular to rods 17a, 18a (17b, 18b) , which are slidingly mounted in respective tubular guides 19a, 20a (19b, 20b) connected to slides 21a, 22a (21b, 22b) frictionally engaging with the terminal connections 5 and 6 (8 and 9) . It may be noted from the above description that each of the two detection units 2 and 3 is provided with an active articulation, namely the one between the two elements 11a, 12a (lib, 12b) of the respective sensor unit 10a (10b) , by means of which it detects the corresponding movement of the body joint, and a passive articulation, namely the one between rods 17a, 18a (17b, 18b) and sensor unit 10a (10b) , by means of which a detection unit follows the movement that the other unit is called upon to detect. Advantageously, on element 11a (lib) there may be mounted a reference goniometer 23a (23b) - shown only in a schematic manner - for the initial regulation (search for the initial zero) and for fixing some parameters of the processing software . The sliding connections between the rods and the relative terminal connections assure a correct operation even in the presence of possible small positioning errors - and the relative kinematic errors that derive therefrom - and make it possible for the two units to be quickly and easily attached to the elastic support 1. Furthermore, in
the case of unit 3 for the detection of the abduction- adduction movement, since this unit is positioned frontally on the rotula and therefore very far from the neutral axis of the lower limb, identified as a projection of the axis of the rods of unit 2, the unit is subject to cyclical lengthenings and shortenings due to the flexion and extension of the knee, both of which are compensated without any mechanical interference by the sliding connection between rods 17b, 18b and respective tubular guides 19b and 20b. The connection between slides 21a, 22a (21b, 22b) carrying tubular guides 19a, 20a (19b, 20b) and respective terminal connections 5, 6 (8, 9) is accomplished by means of a transversely slidable jointing system, i.e. in the direction at right angles to the longitudinal axis of the limb. The connection is moderately forced, so that the position of slides 21a, 22a (21b, 22b) with respect to corresponding terminal 5, 6 (8, 9) can be adjusted by making the former slide on the latter. The connection between the sensor unit 10a for the flexion-extension movement and the respective central attachment pad 4, on the other hand, makes it possible to obtain a fine adjustment of the position of slide 24 on said terminal connection. This regulation is necessary in order to identify unambiguously the position of the flexion-extension detection unit 2 with respect to the femur-tibia reference joint, which is identified by the position of femoral epicondyles, given the different morphological dimensions of the users. In fact, the position of the rotula is the sole absolute positioning of the system that is indifferent to the different size of each particular
user. To this end, with a view to referring the wearable mechatronic system in accordance with the invention to the femoral epicondyles, as shown in Figures 2 and 3, central connection 4, which is in any case fixed to support 1 in such a way as to be situated in proximity of the femur- tibia joint once support 1 has been applied, is provided with a seating 25 with a perimetric groove 25a with which the edge 24a of slide 24 is slidingly engaged. Into groove 25a there projects the end of an elastic presser 26 capable of engaging selectively with one of the corresponding blind holes 27 provided along the edge 24a of the slide 24, thus constituting a snap connection between the two elements. This regulation must be such as to permit an excursion of at least 25 mm with a distance between the holes 26 of the order of 5 mm. The mutual locking of the components can be obtained, for example, by means of a stop pin 28 situated on central connection 4 and readily handled by the operator. A slight tightening of the pin is sufficient to univocally fix the position determined by the elastic presser 28 situated on the opposite side of the central connection 4. Sensor unit 10a, on the other hand, is connected to the respective central connection 7 by means of a bayonet joint 29. The aforesaid type of connection makes it possible for the detection unit to be rapidly attached to and detached from elastic support 1 and this, in turn, makes it possible for the device for measuring movements of body joints with two degrees of freedom to be quickly converted into a device for measuring movements of body joints with one degree of freedom and vice versa. It should also be noted that the device in accordance with the invention can be employed both for the right leg
and the left leg by simply detaching detection unit 2 from connections 4, 5 and 6 and then re-attaching it to the corresponding connections (not visible in the figures) provided on the diagonally opposite part of elastic support 1. The transduction system utilized for transforming the angular displacement between the two elements 11a, 12a (lib, 12b) of sensor unit 10a (10b) around the respective rotation axis into electric signals is based on the principle of the Hall effect. According to this effect, an appropriate voltage (source) applied to a semiconductor element will cause an induced current to flow within it. If no magnetic field is present at the ends of the semiconductor, the voltage output will be almost zero. When the semiconductor (basic Hall element) is placed in a magnetic field oriented at right angles to the Hall current, the (voltage) output will be directly proportional to the intensity of the magnetic field. The Hall sensor is essentially a transducer that responds with a voltage output whenever the applied magnetic field changes. As is known, the characteristic voltage- displacement curve of a Hall-effect sensor is similar to a Gaussian curve, so that, working on a part of this curve, it is possible to obtain, in a repeatable manner and with negligible hysteresis, a practically linear pattern of the voltage variation due to the displacement that has been produced between the sensor and the magnetic source. In the case of the present invention the Hall sensor is fixed to element 11a (lib) , while the magnet is fixed to element 12a (12b) . Obviously, the inverse arrangement is altogether equivalent.
The output signals of the transducer are acquired (conditioned and digitalized) by a local electronic system 30 integral with the knee brace or worn by the user, on his belt for example, and connected by means of two wires to the sensorized support and transmitted, by means of radio-frequency communication for example, to a receiving unit connected to a remote processing system 31. Once the obtained final data have been stored, they are displayed in numerical and/or graphical format . The advantages of the wearable mechatronic device for monitoring body joints in accordance with the invention are clearly brought out by the above description. In fact, it associates a particularly simple, light and modular structure with an arrangement of the sensor units such as to assure substantial alignment of the kinematic axes of rotation with the physiological axes of the limb and extremely small positioning errors due to the fact that the positioning of a sensor unit on the rotula, carried out visually by the operator, also determines the automatic positioning of the other sensor unit at the flexion-extension joint. The device in accordance with the present invention can also be mounted indifferently on either of the lower limbs without any substantial modification and doing nothing other than shifting the detection unit 2 from one side of elastic support 1 to the other. If accurate responses are to be obtained from the device in accordance with the present invention, it is necessary to carry out a phase of aligning the two sensor units with the anatomical markers after the device has been put on, thus obtaining alignment with the effective position of the femur-tibia structure in both the sagittal
and the frontal plane. To this end the operator has to identify some reference points on the patient's body and, more precisely, two significant points of the bone structure of the femur that can be easily identified by touch, for example, the minor trochanter (or femur head) and the major trochanter, situated respectively in the frontal plane and the sagittal plane, the femoral epicondyles and two significant points of the tibio-tarsal joint of the ankle (forming part of the astragalus for example) , these once again referred to the sagittal and frontal planes, and then align rods 17b and 18b of the varus/valgus detection unit 3 with them. Although in the present description reference has always been made to a joint of the human body, it is obvious that, with appropriate dimensional modifications, the device in accordance with the present invention can also be applied to the joints of animals (such as, for example, horses) . Variants and/or modifications may be introduced in the wearable mechatronic device for monitoring the movements of body joints in accordance with the present invention without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the claims attached hereto.