US9769074B2 - Network per-flow rate limiting - Google Patents
Network per-flow rate limiting Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US9769074B2 US9769074B2 US13/833,886 US201313833886A US9769074B2 US 9769074 B2 US9769074 B2 US 9769074B2 US 201313833886 A US201313833886 A US 201313833886A US 9769074 B2 US9769074 B2 US 9769074B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- flow
- data
- flow control
- switch
- data flow
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 26
- 230000000246 remedial effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 32
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 24
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 17
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 14
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 13
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005111 flow chemistry technique Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000013307 optical fiber Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/10—Flow control; Congestion control
- H04L47/12—Avoiding congestion; Recovering from congestion
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/08—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
- H04L43/0876—Network utilisation, e.g. volume of load or congestion level
- H04L43/0882—Utilisation of link capacity
Definitions
- Ethernet networks are typically employed in local area networks (LANs) that include a plurality of network switches.
- LANs local area networks
- a number of communication protocols have been developed and continue to evolve to enhance Ethernet network performance for various environments.
- DCB data center bridging
- CEE converged enhanced Ethernet
- DCE data center Ethernet
- FCoE Fibre Channel over Ethernet
- iWARP Internet Wide Area Remote direct memory access Protocol
- RoCE Remote direct memory access over Converged Ethernet
- Network congestion is a problem that occurs when the data flow is received from a source at a faster rate than the flow can be outputted or routed. Such congestion results in a reduction of quality of service, causing packets to be dropped, or queuing and/or transmission of packets to be delayed.
- a method of monitoring data flow in a network includes: configuring a data flow including a plurality of data packets by a switch controller, the switch controller configured to control routing through the switch and switch configuration, wherein configuring includes storing an indication of a flow control policy in one or more of the data packets; monitoring a network switch receiving the data flow, wherein monitoring includes determining flow statistics in the switch; determining whether a congestion condition exists for the data flow based on the flow statistics and the flow control policy; and based on determining that the congestion condition exists for the data flow, performing a remedial action specific to the data flow to address the congestion condition.
- a method of processing data flows in a network switch includes: receiving a data flow at the network switch, the data flow including a plurality of data packets, wherein one or more of the data packets includes an indication of a flow control policy specific to the data flow; storing the indication of the flow control policy in a flow control queue in the network switch, the flow control policy associated with a threshold for comparison to flow statistics for the data flow; and processing the data flow at the network switch according to instructions associated with the data flow and configured by a switch controller.
- a computer program product for monitoring data flow in a network includes a tangible storage medium readable by a processing circuit and storing instructions for execution by the processing circuit for performing a method including: configuring a data flow including a plurality of data packets by a switch controller, the switch controller configured to control routing through the switch and switch configuration, wherein configuring includes storing an indication of a flow control policy in one or more of the data packets; monitoring a network switch receiving the data flow, wherein monitoring includes determining flow statistics in the switch; determining whether a congestion condition exists for the data flow based on the flow statistics and the flow control policy; and based on determining that the congestion condition exists for the data flow, performing a remedial action specific to the data flow to address the congestion condition.
- a computer program product for processing data flows in a network switch.
- the computer program product includes a tangible storage medium readable by a processing circuit and storing instructions for execution by the processing circuit for performing a method including: receiving a data flow at the network switch, the data flow including a plurality of data packets, wherein one or more of the data packets includes an indication of a flow control policy specific to the data flow; storing the indication of the flow control policy in a flow control queue in the network switch, the flow control policy associated with a threshold for comparison to flow statistics for the data flow; and processing the data flow at the network switch according to instructions associated with the data flow and configured by a switch controller.
- an apparatus for controlling a network switch includes a memory having computer readable computer instructions; and a processor for executing the computer readable instructions.
- the instructions are for: configuring a data flow including a plurality of data packets by a switch controller, the switch controller configured to control routing through the switch and switch configuration, wherein configuring includes storing an indication of a flow control policy in one or more of the data packets; monitoring a network switch receiving the data flow, wherein monitoring includes determining flow statistics in the switch; determining whether a congestion condition exists for the data flow based on the flow statistics and the flow control policy; and based on determining that the congestion condition exists for the data flow, performing a remedial action specific to the data flow to address the congestion condition.
- FIG. 1 depicts a block diagram of a system including a network with OpenFlow-capable switches that may be implemented according to an embodiment
- FIG. 2 depicts a block diagram of an OpenFlow-capable switch according to an embodiment
- FIG. 3 depicts an example of an OpenFlow flow switching definition that can be used in embodiments
- FIG. 4 depicts an exemplary embodiment of a portion of a network including a network switch and a switch controller
- FIG. 5 depicts an example of a data packet
- FIG. 6 is a flow diagram showing a method of monitoring and/or processing data flows in a network.
- Exemplary embodiments relate to monitoring data flows processed in network switches.
- An embodiment of a network includes one or more switches, each connected to a network controller or switch controller configured to control the switch.
- a plurality of network switches are connected to and controlled by a central switch controller.
- the controller sends control data packets to the switch to effect various configurations and routing functions.
- the controller is configured to incorporate flow control information such as Quality of Service (QoS) policies into data packets (e.g., in packet headers) of a data flow for use in monitoring specific flows as they are processed in a network switch.
- QoS Quality of Service
- An exemplary method includes monitoring flow statistics for data flows in a network switch, and comparing the flow statistics to a threshold based on flow control information specific to each data flow.
- the flow control information is stored in the switch in a flow control queue that includes indications of QoS policies associated with specific data flows.
- the system 100 is a data center environment including a plurality of servers 102 and client systems 104 configured to communicate over the network 101 using switches 106 that are OpenFlow-capable.
- the servers 102 also referred as hosts or host systems, are high-speed processing devices (e.g., mainframe computers, desktop computers, laptop computers, hand-held devices, embedded computing devices, or the like) including at least one processing circuit (e.g., a computer processor/CPU) capable of reading and executing instructions, and handling interactions with various components of the system 100 .
- the servers 102 may be storage system servers configured to access and store large amounts of data to one or more data storage systems 108 .
- the client systems 104 can include a variety of desktop, laptop, general-purpose computer devices, mobile computing devices, and/or networked devices with processing circuits and input/output (I/O) interfaces, such as keys/buttons, a touch screen, audio input, a display device and audio output.
- the client systems 104 can be linked directly to one or more of the switches 106 or wirelessly through one or more wireless access points 110 .
- the data storage systems 108 refer to any type of computer readable storage media and may include one or more secondary storage elements, e.g., hard disk drive (HDD), solid-state memory, tape, or a storage subsystem that is internal or external to the servers 102 .
- Types of data that may be stored in the data storage systems 108 include, for example, various files and databases.
- the system 100 also includes a network controller 112 that is a central software defined network controller configured to make routing decisions within the network 101 .
- the network controller 112 establishes one or more secure links 103 to configure the switches 106 and establish communication properties of links 105 between the switches 106 .
- the network controller 112 can configure the switches 106 to control packet routing paths for data flows between the servers 102 and client systems 104 , as well as one or more firewalls 114 and one or more load balancers 116 .
- the one or more firewalls 114 restrict access and the flow of network traffic between the network 101 and one or more external networks 118 .
- the one or more load balancers 116 can distribute workloads across multiple computers, such as between the servers 102 .
- the servers 102 , client systems 104 , and network controller 112 can include various computer/communication hardware and software technology known in the art, such as one or more processing units or circuits, volatile and non-volatile memory including removable media, power supplies, network interfaces, support circuitry, operating systems, and the like. Although the network controller 112 is depicted as a separate component, it will be understood that network configuration functionality can alternatively be implemented in one or more of the servers 102 or client systems 104 in a standalone or distributed format.
- the network 101 can include a combination of wireless, wired, and/or fiber optic links.
- the network 101 as depicted in FIG. 1 represents a simplified example for purposes of explanation.
- Embodiments of the network 101 can include numerous switches 106 (e.g., hundreds) with dozens of ports and links per switch 106 .
- the network 101 may support a variety of known communication standards that allow data to be transmitted between the servers 102 , client systems 104 , switches 106 , network controller 112 , firewalls(s) 114 , and load balancer(s) 116 .
- Communication protocols are typically implemented in one or more layers, such as a physical layer (layer-1), a link layer (layer-2), a network layer (layer-3), a transport layer (layer-4), and an application layer (layer-5).
- the network 101 supports OpenFlow as a layer-2 protocol.
- the switches 106 can be dedicated OpenFlow switches or OpenFlow-enabled general purpose switches that also support layer-2 and layer-3 Ethernet.
- FIG. 2 depicts a block diagram of the switch 106 of FIG. 1 that supports OpenFlow.
- the switch 106 includes switch logic 202 , secure channel 204 , protocol support 205 , flow table 206 , buffers 208 a - 208 n including various queues 209 a - 209 n , and ports 210 a - 210 n .
- the switch 106 includes various counters or timers 211 , such as timers associated with queues 209 a - 209 n , the flow table 206 and/or flow table entries.
- the switch logic 202 may be implemented in one or more processing circuits, where a computer readable storage medium is configured to hold instructions for the switch logic 202 , as well as various variables and constants to support operation of the switch 106 .
- the switch logic 202 forwards packets between the ports 210 a - 210 n as flows defined by the network controller 112 of FIG. 1 .
- the secure channel 204 connects the switch 106 to the network controller 112 of FIG. 1 .
- the secure channel 204 allows commands and packets to be communicated between the network controller 112 and the switch 106 via the OpenFlow protocol.
- the secure channel 204 can be implemented in software as executable instructions stored within the switch 106 .
- Protocol details to establish a protocol definition for an implementation of OpenFlow and other protocols can be stored in the protocol support 205 .
- the protocol support 205 may be software that defines one or more supported protocol formats.
- the protocol support 205 can be embodied in a computer readable storage medium, for instance, flash memory, which is configured to hold instructions for execution by the switch logic 202 . Implementing the protocol support 205 as software enables updates in the field for new versions or variations of protocols and can provide OpenFlow as an enhancement to existing conventional routers or switches.
- the flow table 206 defines supported connection types associated with particular addresses, virtual local area networks or switch ports, and is used by the switch to process data flows received at the switch.
- a data flow is a sequence of data packets grouped in some manner, e.g., by source and/or destination, or otherwise defined by selected criteria. Each data flow may be mapped to a port and associated queue based on the flow table 206 . For example, a data flow is defined as all packets that match a particular header format.
- Each entry 211 in the flow table 206 can include one or more rules 212 , actions 214 , and statistics 216 associated with a particular flow.
- the rules 212 define each flow and can be determined by packet headers.
- the actions 214 define how packets are processed.
- the statistics 216 track information such as the size of each flow (e.g., number of bytes), the number of packets for each flow, and time since the last matching packet of the flow or connection time. Examples of actions include instructions for forwarding packets of a flow to one or more specific ports 210 a - 210 n (e.g., unicast or multicast), encapsulating and forwarding packets of a flow to the network controller 112 of FIG. 1 , and dropping packets of the flow.
- Entries 211 in the flow table 206 can be added and removed by the network controller 112 of FIG. 1 via the secure channel 204 .
- the network controller 112 of FIG. 1 can pre-populate the entries 211 in the flow table 206 .
- the switch 106 can request creation of an entry 211 from the network controller 112 upon receiving a flow without a corresponding entry 211 in the flow table 206 .
- the buffers 208 a - 208 n provide temporary storage in queues 209 a - 209 n for flows as packets are sent between the ports 210 a - 210 n .
- the buffers 208 a - 208 n temporarily store packets until the associated ports 210 a - 210 n and links 105 of FIG. 1 are available.
- Each of the buffers 208 a - 208 n may be associated with a particular port, flow, or sub-network.
- Each of the buffers 208 a - 208 n is logically separate but need not be physically independent. Accordingly, when one of the buffers 208 a - 208 n is full, it does not adversely impact the performance of the other buffers 208 a - 208 n within the switch 106 .
- each port 210 a - 210 n is attached to a respective queue 209 a - 209 n .
- the switch 106 attempts to match the packet by comparing fields (referred to as “match fields”) to corresponding fields in flow entries of each flow table 206 .
- Exemplary match fields include ingress port and metadata fields, as well as header fields such as those described below in reference to FIG. 3 .
- matching starts at the first flow table and may continue to additional flow tables.
- the switch 106 may perform an action based on the switch configuration, e.g., the packet may be forwarded to the controller or dropped. If the packet matches a flow entry in a flow table, the corresponding instruction set is executed based on the flow entry, e.g., the actions field 214 . For example, when a packet is matched to a flow entry including an output action, the packet is forwarded to one of ports 210 a - 210 n specified in the flow entry.
- forwarding the packet to a port includes mapping packets in a flow to a queue attached to the port. Such flows are treated according to the queue's configuration (e.g., minimum rate).
- the switch 106 also includes one or more flow control queues 218 that include flow control information for each data flow received by the switch 106 .
- the flow control information includes data representing a flow control setting or policy, such as a quality of service (QoS) policy.
- QoS policy defines a level of flow control assigned to a respective data flow. For example, a data flow can be assigned a QoS policy specifying a minimum throughput (e.g., queue transmission rate), maximum queue depth, dropped packet rate, bit error rate, latency, jitter, etc.
- the flow control queue(s) 218 allow the switch 406 and/or controller 408 to individually monitor each data flow in the switch 406 and modify flow processing based on a QoS policy specific to each data flow, e.g., by throttling on/off specific flows or alerting the switch controller 408 to allow the flow to be re-routed, dropped or rate-limited.
- the flow control queue 218 is not limited to the embodiments described herein.
- the flow control queue 218 may be embodied as any suitable data structure (e.g., a table) that allows the switch 106 and/or the controller to compare individual data flow metrics or statistics to a flow policy and modify flow processing therefrom.
- flow queue(s) 218 may be embodied as a separate or additional (physical or virtual) queue, or as space allocated from an existing virtual queue.
- FIG. 3 depicts an example of an OpenFlow flow switching definition 300 that can be used in embodiments.
- the OpenFlow flow switching definition 300 is a packet header that defines the flow and includes a number of fields.
- the switching definition 300 is a flow header that includes up to eleven tuples or fields; however, not all tuples need to be defined depending upon particular flows.
- FIG. 3 depicts an example of an OpenFlow flow switching definition 300 that can be used in embodiments.
- the OpenFlow flow switching definition 300 is a packet header that defines the flow and includes a number of fields.
- the switching definition 300 is a flow header that includes up to eleven tuples or fields; however, not all tuples need to be defined depending upon particular flows.
- the OpenFlow flow switching definition 300 includes tuples for identifying an ingress port 302 , an Ethernet destination address 304 , an Ethernet source address 306 , an Ethernet type 308 , a virtual local area network (VLAN) priority 310 , a VLAN identifier 312 , an Internet protocol (IP) source address 314 , an IP destination address 316 , an IP protocol 318 , a transmission control protocol (TCP)/user datagram protocol (UDP) source port 320 , and a TCP/UDP destination port 322 .
- the Ethernet destination address 304 may represent a layer-2 Ethernet hardware address or media access control (MAC) address used in legacy switching and routing.
- the IP destination address 316 may represent a layer-3 IP address used in legacy switching and routing.
- Flow switching can be defined for any combination of tuples in the OpenFlow flow switching definition 300 , with a particular combination of tuples serving as a key.
- flows can be defined in a rule 212 of FIG. 2 by exact matching or wildcard matching for aggregated MAC-subnets, IP-subnets, ports, VLAN identifiers, and the like.
- FIG. 4 depicts a block diagram of a network portion 400 .
- a server 402 is coupled by a link 404 to a switch 406 .
- An exemplary server 402 is a server 102 of FIG. 1
- an exemplary switch 406 is a switch 106 of FIG. 1 .
- a controller 408 (e.g., a network controller) is linked to the switch 406 by, e.g., a secure link 410 .
- the controller is a network controller such as network controller 112 of FIG. 1 .
- functions of the controller 408 can be integrated into other network entities such as the server 402 or server 102 .
- the switch 406 is connected to the server 402 , which includes at least one port 412 and various logical components such as mode selection logic 414 , wait pulse repetition time 416 , and protocol and mode of operation configuration 418 .
- Logical components described herein can be implemented in instructions stored in a computer readable storage medium for execution by a processing circuit or in hardware circuitry, and can be configured to send frames such as link initialization frames and data packets.
- the switch 406 , server 402 and controller 408 may support a number of modes of operation including, but not limited to, Ethernet, Fibre Channel, Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE), Internet Wide Area Remote direct memory access Protocol (iWARP), and Remote direct memory access over Converged Ethernet (RoCE).
- the switch 406 includes switch logic 420 , flow table 422 , protocol support 424 , port configuration and reset logic 425 and multiple ports, such as port 426 for communicating with the server 402 and port 428 for communicating with other network entities such as other switches or servers.
- the ports may be physical ports, virtual ports defined by the switch, and/or a virtual port defined by the OpenFlow protocol. Each port may be attached to one or more port queues 427 and 429 .
- the switch 406 When implemented as an OpenFlow switch, the switch 406 also includes a secure channel 430 for communicating with the network controller 408 on secure link 410 .
- the switch also includes at least one flow control queue 432 configured to store flow control information such as a QoS policy that is associated with each individual data flow.
- the switch 406 receives the queue information from one or more data packets received as part of a specific data flow, and stores the flow control information in the flow queue 432 .
- the flow control information is associated with the specific flow.
- Multiple QoS policies for multiple flows may be stored in the flow control queue 432 (or other designated queue, virtual queue space or other data structure).
- An exemplary data packet in which the flow control information may be stored is described below in conjunction with FIG. 5 .
- Capability of the switch to receive and store the flow control information and control packet processing based on the flow information is embodied in suitable logic, such as flow rate logic 434 .
- This capability may be embodied in any suitable manner, e.g., configured as part of switch logic 420 .
- the network controller 408 includes an action table 436 that holds port and protocol information for the switch 406 , as well as rules, actions, and statistics for flows through the switch 406 and other switches, such as switches 106 of FIG. 1 .
- the network controller 408 also includes flow control logic 438 that can be implemented in instructions stored in a computer readable storage medium for execution by a processing circuit or in hardware circuitry.
- the network controller 408 can manage updates of the flow table 422 in the switch 406 . Based on the updating of the flow table 422 , the port and protocol information in the action table 432 of the network controller 408 is updated to reflect the changes.
- the network controller also include suitable logic, e.g., QoS logic 440 , that allows the controller 408 to set flow control or QoS levels, monitor packet routing performance in the switch 406 and modify packet processing (e.g., dropping, rate-limiting or re-routing flows) according to pre-set QoS levels.
- QoS logic 440 suitable logic that allows the controller 408 to set flow control or QoS levels, monitor packet routing performance in the switch 406 and modify packet processing (e.g., dropping, rate-limiting or re-routing flows) according to pre-set QoS levels.
- the controller 408 may also be configured to configure and/or modify data packets to include the flow information therein, e.g., by inserting a tag in packet headers via a push action.
- the network controller 408 communicates with the switch 406 via a secure link 410 established using a specified port, such as a port in a physical network controller 112 or a controller implemented in other processors, such as a server 102 or client system 104 .
- the network controller 408 communicates with the switch 406 to configure and manage the switch, receive events from the switch and send packets out the switch.
- Various message types can be sent between the switch and the controller to accomplish such functions, including controller-to-switch, asynchronous and symmetric messages.
- Controller-to-switch messages are initiated by the controller 408 and may or may not require a response from the switch 406 .
- Features messages are used to request the capabilities of the switch 406 (e.g., upon establishment of the secure link), in response to which the switch 406 should return a features reply that specifies the capabilities of the switch 406 .
- Configuration messages are sent by the controller 408 to set and query configuration parameters in the switch 406 .
- the switch 406 only responds to a query from the controller 408 .
- Modify-State messages are sent by the controller 408 to manage state on the switches, e.g., to add/delete and/or modify flows/groups in the flow table 422 and to set switch port properties.
- Read-State messages are used by the controller to collect statistics from the switch.
- Packet-out messages are used by the controller to send packets out of a specified port on the switch, and to forward packets received via Packet-in messages.
- Packet-out messages contain a full packet or a buffer ID referencing a packet stored in the switch. Packet-out messages also contain a list of actions to be applied in the order they are specified; an empty action list drops the packet.
- Asynchronous messages are sent without the controller 408 soliciting them from the switch 406 .
- the switch 406 sends asynchronous messages to the controller 408 to, e.g., denote a packet arrival, switch state change, or error.
- a packet-in event message may be sent to the controller 408 from the switch 406 for packets that do not have a matching flow entry, and may be sent from the controller 408 to the switch 406 for packets forwarded to the controller 408 .
- Flow-removed messages are used to indicate that a flow entry has been removed due to, e.g., inactivity or expiration of the flow entry.
- Port-status messages are sent in response to changes in port configuration state and port status events. Error messages may be used by the switch 406 to notify the controller 408 of problems.
- Symmetric messages are sent without solicitation, in either direction.
- Hello messages may be exchanged between the switch 406 and controller 408 upon connection startup.
- Echo request/reply messages can be sent from either the switch 406 or the controller 408 , and can be used to measure the latency or bandwidth of a controller-switch connection, as well as verify its liveness.
- Experimenter messages provide a way for the switch 406 to offer additional functionality within the OpenFlow message type space.
- FIG. 5 depicts an embodiment of a data frame or data packet 500 .
- the data packet 500 includes a preamble 502 , a start of frame (SOF) delimiter 504 , a header 506 , payload data 508 and a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) checksum 510 .
- the header 506 includes network address information and protocol information.
- the frame 500 includes a destination MAC address 512 , a source MAC address 514 and an Ethernet type field 516 .
- the frame 500 includes flow control or QoS information for the frame 500 and the corresponding data flow.
- the flow control information may be included in a field inserted in the data packet 50 or in an existing field.
- the flow control information is included in the packet header 506 .
- the Ethertype field 516 includes a tag 518 that specifies a type or level of flow control associated with the data flow.
- a new delimiter may be added to indicate any additional bytes included for the flow control information.
- An exemplary tag 518 includes a two-bit field indicating a level of QoS. In this example, four levels of QoS may be specified.
- exemplary data packets include flow information added to a packet header, e.g., a IPv4 or IPv6 header.
- the information may be included by adding bits to the header or remapping bits in the header.
- header fields such as source address (SA), destination address (DA) and type of service (TOS) fields can be set as match fields and include flow control information without requiring additional bits to be added to the header.
- SA source address
- DA destination address
- TOS type of service
- the frame 500 and the header 506 are not limited to the specific embodiments described herein.
- the header 506 may include different or additional fields depending on protocols used.
- the header 506 may include any number of fields as described with reference to the switching definition 300 .
- FIG. 6 An embodiment of a method 600 of monitoring data transmission and/or processing data flows in a network is described with reference to FIG. 6 .
- the method 600 is described in conjunction with the network portion 400 shown in FIG. 4 , but is not so limited.
- the method includes the steps represented by blocks 601 - 605 in the order described. However, in some embodiments, not all of the steps are performed and/or the steps are performed in a different order than that described.
- the controller 408 (or other processor originating a network operation) receives data to be transmitted through a network and generates or configures a group of data packets such as packets 500 .
- the group of data packets 500 is referred to as a data flow.
- the network is an OpenFlow capable network.
- each data packet 500 (or some subset of data packets 500 in the data flow) is configured to include flow control information such as QoS policy information.
- the flow control information may be included in any suitable part of the data packet 500 , such as in a tag field 518 .
- An example of the flow control information includes a QoS policy having multiple QoS levels.
- Each QoS level corresponds to a level of service.
- Exemplary service levels include queue depth levels, bit rate or throughput levels in the switch 406 and/or in various port queues, latency and jitter.
- specific latency sensitive messages may be tagged as exempt from the QoS policy.
- a queue depth level refers to an amount or percentage of the queue depth that is filled, or the available queue depth. As described herein, “queue depth” refers to the maximum number of packets or maximum amount of data that a queue can hold before packets are dropped. Each QoS level can represent a different queue depth level.
- Embodiments described herein include originating or configuring packets by the controller 408 at the beginning of the data flow, but are not so limited.
- the switch 406 and/or controller 408 may receive data packets 500 from a source, and the controller 408 may configure each data packet 500 by inserting flow control information such as a QoS level into the packet header, e.g., by adding bits or reconfiguring an existing field.
- the switch 406 receives and processes the data packets. Processing includes matching the data packets and performing actions such as forwarding the data packets to appropriate ports.
- the controller 408 may perform various functions during operation of the switch. For example, the controller 408 manages switches 406 in a network by initializing switches, populating and/or modifying flow tables to manage flows, sending flows to various switches and communicating with switches in general.
- the switch 406 upon receiving each data packet, stores the QoS policy or other flow control information in the flow control queue 432 and the switch 406 and/or the controller 408 monitors flow statistics specified by the QoS policy. For example, the switch 406 and/or the controller 408 monitors port ingress and/or egress queues (e.g., queues 427 and 429 ) and determines statistics such as amount of queue depth filled, ingress rate and egress rate.
- port ingress and/or egress queues e.g., queues 427 and 429
- the switch 406 and/or the controller 408 compares the monitored statistics to service level thresholds established by the QoS policy. For example, the switch 406 compares statistics such as the amount of queue filled, the ingress rate and/or the egress rate to a threshold defined by the QoS policy. For example, the two-bit tag 518 indicates a selected QoS level that is associated with a threshold. If the statistics exceed the threshold associated with that level, a congestion condition is detected. For example, a congestion condition may be backpressure on a specific data flow in the switch 406 .
- the controller 408 takes remedial or corrective action specifically for that data flow.
- remedial actions include rate-limiting the data flow, turning off the data flow in the switch, and re-routing the data flow.
- the remedial action includes rate-limiting the data flow at the data flow's source by the controller 408 .
- the controller 408 throttles on or off specific flows in the switch 408 using the flow information stored in the flow control queue. For example, the controller 408 sends a controller-to-switch message to direct the switch 406 to turn off a specified data flow.
- inventions described herein allow for the monitoring and rate-limiting of specific data flows in a switch.
- Embodiments also allow a central controller to assign specific flow control levels to each data flow and monitor data flows in multiple switches according to flow control levels stored in the switches and assigned to each flow.
- aspects of the present invention may be embodied as a system, method or computer program product. Accordingly, aspects of the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (including firmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects that may all generally be referred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.” Furthermore, aspects of the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied in one or more computer readable medium(s) having computer readable program code embodied thereon.
- the computer readable medium may be a computer readable signal medium or a computer readable storage medium.
- a computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
- a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible and non-transitory storage medium that can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
- a computer readable signal medium may include a propagated data signal with computer readable program code embodied therein, for example, in baseband or as part of a carrier wave. Such a propagated signal may take any of a variety of forms, including, but not limited to, electro-magnetic, optical, or any suitable combination thereof.
- a computer readable signal medium may be any computer readable medium that is not a computer readable storage medium and that can communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
- Program code embodied on a computer readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to wireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, RF, etc., or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
- Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present invention may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages.
- the program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server.
- the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
- LAN local area network
- WAN wide area network
- Internet Service Provider for example, AT&T, MCI, Sprint, EarthLink, MSN, GTE, etc.
- These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
- the computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
- each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s).
- the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (24)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/833,886 US9769074B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2013-03-15 | Network per-flow rate limiting |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/833,886 US9769074B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2013-03-15 | Network per-flow rate limiting |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20140269319A1 US20140269319A1 (en) | 2014-09-18 |
US9769074B2 true US9769074B2 (en) | 2017-09-19 |
Family
ID=51526632
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/833,886 Active 2033-09-23 US9769074B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2013-03-15 | Network per-flow rate limiting |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9769074B2 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20170180240A1 (en) * | 2015-12-16 | 2017-06-22 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Openflow configured horizontally split hybrid sdn nodes |
US10057170B2 (en) * | 2016-09-23 | 2018-08-21 | Gigamon Inc. | Intelligent dropping of packets in a network visibility fabric |
US10419350B2 (en) * | 2017-10-06 | 2019-09-17 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp | Packet admission |
Families Citing this family (33)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11258531B2 (en) | 2005-04-07 | 2022-02-22 | Opanga Networks, Inc. | System and method for peak flow detection in a communication network |
CN103095521B (en) * | 2012-12-18 | 2016-03-30 | 华为技术有限公司 | The control method of flow detection, system, device, controller and checkout equipment |
US9596192B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-03-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Reliable link layer for control links between network controllers and switches |
US9609086B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-03-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Virtual machine mobility using OpenFlow |
WO2014186986A1 (en) * | 2013-05-24 | 2014-11-27 | 华为技术有限公司 | Stream forwarding method, device and system |
US9866491B2 (en) * | 2013-12-20 | 2018-01-09 | Nxp Usa, Inc. | Method and system for avoiding new flow packet flood from data plane to control plane of a network device |
US9716653B2 (en) * | 2014-11-18 | 2017-07-25 | Hauwei Technologies Co., Ltd. | System and method for flow-based addressing in a mobile environment |
US9571412B2 (en) * | 2014-11-21 | 2017-02-14 | Cavium, Inc. | Systems and methods for hardware accelerated timer implementation for openflow protocol |
CN105743726A (en) * | 2014-12-10 | 2016-07-06 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Traffic statistics and analysis method for feature data message and corresponding device |
CN104618157B (en) * | 2015-01-27 | 2018-05-18 | 华为技术有限公司 | Network management, equipment and system |
US9680731B2 (en) | 2015-02-27 | 2017-06-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adaptive software defined networking controller |
WO2016141239A1 (en) * | 2015-03-03 | 2016-09-09 | Opanga Networks, Inc. | Systems and methods for pacing data flows |
WO2017030604A1 (en) * | 2015-08-20 | 2017-02-23 | Ruckus Wireless, Inc. | Virtual-machine dataplane having fixed interpacket time |
WO2017058188A1 (en) * | 2015-09-30 | 2017-04-06 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp | Identification of an sdn action path based on a measured flow rate |
WO2017066947A1 (en) * | 2015-10-22 | 2017-04-27 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method, device and system for processing service |
US9906460B2 (en) * | 2015-12-31 | 2018-02-27 | Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. | Data plane for processing function scalability |
US10693705B2 (en) | 2016-03-23 | 2020-06-23 | Arista Networks, Inc. | Show command service aka CLI relay |
US10917284B2 (en) | 2016-05-23 | 2021-02-09 | Arista Networks, Inc. | Method and system for using an OpenConfig architecture on network elements |
US10187286B2 (en) * | 2016-05-23 | 2019-01-22 | Arista Networks, Inc. | Method and system for tracking network device information in a network switch |
US10567988B2 (en) | 2016-06-03 | 2020-02-18 | Opanga Networks, Inc. | Radio access type detection using traffic metrics |
WO2018044281A1 (en) | 2016-08-30 | 2018-03-08 | Ruckus Wireless, Inc. | Virtual-machine dataplane with dhcp-server functionality |
CN108243116B (en) | 2016-12-23 | 2021-09-14 | 华为技术有限公司 | Flow control method and switching equipment |
US20180324631A1 (en) * | 2017-05-05 | 2018-11-08 | Mediatek Inc. | Using sdap headers for handling of as/nas reflective qos and to ensure in-sequence packet delivery during remapping in 5g communication systems |
US10541866B2 (en) * | 2017-07-25 | 2020-01-21 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Detecting and resolving multicast traffic performance issues |
CN111386683A (en) * | 2017-11-27 | 2020-07-07 | 欧庞戈网络有限公司 | System and method for accelerating or decelerating a data transport network protocol based on real-time transport network congestion conditions |
US11178018B2 (en) | 2018-09-28 | 2021-11-16 | Arista Networks, Inc. | Method and system for managing real network systems using simulation results |
US10880166B2 (en) | 2019-02-21 | 2020-12-29 | Arista Networks, Inc. | Multi-cluster management plane for network devices |
CN110048968B (en) * | 2019-04-12 | 2021-06-22 | 网宿科技股份有限公司 | Domain name bandwidth adjusting method and device |
US10958592B2 (en) | 2019-04-12 | 2021-03-23 | Wangsu Science & Technology Co., Ltd. | Domain name bandwidth adjustment method and apparatus |
WO2020236302A1 (en) | 2019-05-23 | 2020-11-26 | Cray Inc. | Systems and methods for on the fly routing in the presence of errors |
CN111585892B (en) * | 2020-04-29 | 2022-08-12 | 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 | Data center flow management and control method and system |
US11057275B1 (en) | 2020-09-18 | 2021-07-06 | Arista Networks, Inc. | Method and system for achieving high availability of a primary network controller in a network controller cluster using distributed network device state information |
CN114244584B (en) * | 2021-12-02 | 2023-07-25 | 中盈优创资讯科技有限公司 | Method and device for realizing automatic suppression and protection based on network equipment log |
Citations (166)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2313268A (en) | 1996-05-17 | 1997-11-19 | Motorola Ltd | Transmitting data with error correction |
US5694390A (en) | 1993-09-06 | 1997-12-02 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Method and apparatus for controlling congestion in communication network |
EP0876023A1 (en) | 1997-04-30 | 1998-11-04 | Sony Corporation | Transmitter and transmitting method, receiver and receiving method, and transceiver and transmitting/receiving method |
US5905711A (en) | 1996-03-28 | 1999-05-18 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling data transfer rates using marking threshold in asynchronous transfer mode networks |
WO1999030462A2 (en) | 1997-12-12 | 1999-06-17 | 3Com Corporation | A forward error correction system for packet based real-time media |
US5966546A (en) | 1996-09-12 | 1999-10-12 | Cabletron Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing TX raw cell status report frequency and interrupt frequency mitigation in a network node |
US6094418A (en) | 1996-03-07 | 2000-07-25 | Fujitsu Limited | Feedback control method and device in ATM switching system |
US6208619B1 (en) | 1997-03-27 | 2001-03-27 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Packet data flow control method and device |
US20010056459A1 (en) | 1998-08-31 | 2001-12-27 | Yoshitoshi Kurose | Service assignment apparatus |
US6356944B1 (en) | 1997-03-31 | 2002-03-12 | Compaq Information Technologies Group, L.P. | System and method for increasing write performance in a fibre channel environment |
US20020073354A1 (en) | 2000-07-28 | 2002-06-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Cascading failover of a data management application for shared disk file systems in loosely coupled node clusters |
US20020159386A1 (en) | 2001-04-30 | 2002-10-31 | Gilbert Grosdidier | Method for dynamical identification of network congestion characteristics |
US20020181484A1 (en) | 1998-04-01 | 2002-12-05 | Takeshi Aimoto | Packet switch and switching method for switching variable length packets |
US20020196749A1 (en) | 2001-06-25 | 2002-12-26 | Eyuboglu M. Vedat | Radio network control |
US6504821B2 (en) | 1996-06-12 | 2003-01-07 | At&T Corp. | Flexible bandwidth negotiation for the block transfer of data |
US6504818B1 (en) | 1998-12-03 | 2003-01-07 | At&T Corp. | Fair share egress queuing scheme for data networks |
US20030051187A1 (en) | 2001-08-09 | 2003-03-13 | Victor Mashayekhi | Failover system and method for cluster environment |
US20040153866A1 (en) | 2002-11-15 | 2004-08-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Markov model of availability for clustered systems |
US20040170123A1 (en) | 2003-02-27 | 2004-09-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for managing of denial of service attacks using bandwidth allocation technology |
US20040179476A1 (en) | 2003-03-10 | 2004-09-16 | Sung-Ha Kim | Apparatus and method for controlling a traffic switching operation based on a service class in an ethernet-based network |
US6795399B1 (en) | 1998-11-24 | 2004-09-21 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Link capacity computation methods and apparatus for designing IP networks with performance guarantees |
US20040199609A1 (en) | 2003-04-07 | 2004-10-07 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for web server migration |
US6813246B1 (en) | 1998-08-06 | 2004-11-02 | Alcatel | Routing calls with overflows in a private network |
US20040228278A1 (en) | 2003-05-13 | 2004-11-18 | Corrigent Systems, Ltd. | Bandwidth allocation for link aggregation |
US6947380B1 (en) | 2000-12-01 | 2005-09-20 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Guaranteed bandwidth mechanism for a terabit multiservice switch |
US6975592B1 (en) | 2000-11-22 | 2005-12-13 | Nortel Networks Limited | Configurable rule-engine for layer-7 and traffic characteristic-based classification |
US20060126509A1 (en) | 2004-12-09 | 2006-06-15 | Firas Abi-Nassif | Traffic management in a wireless data network |
US20060187874A1 (en) | 2005-02-24 | 2006-08-24 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for supporting data flow control in a wireless mesh network |
US20060203828A1 (en) | 2003-10-02 | 2006-09-14 | Masayuki Kumazawa | Router selecting method and router apparatus |
US20060209695A1 (en) | 2005-03-15 | 2006-09-21 | Archer Shafford R Jr | Load balancing in a distributed telecommunications platform |
US20060215550A1 (en) | 2005-03-23 | 2006-09-28 | Richa Malhotra | Method and apparatus for flow control of data in a network |
US7187652B2 (en) | 2001-12-26 | 2007-03-06 | Tropic Networks Inc. | Multi-constraint routing system and method |
US20070081454A1 (en) | 2005-10-11 | 2007-04-12 | Cisco Technology, Inc. A Corporation Of California | Methods and devices for backward congestion notification |
US7234073B1 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2007-06-19 | Emc Corporation | System and methods for failover management of manageable entity agents |
US20070183332A1 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2007-08-09 | Jong-Sang Oh | System and method for backward congestion notification in network |
US20070204266A1 (en) | 2006-02-28 | 2007-08-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Systems and methods for dynamically managing virtual machines |
US20070220121A1 (en) | 2006-03-18 | 2007-09-20 | Ignatia Suwarna | Virtual machine migration between servers |
US7289453B2 (en) | 2001-12-13 | 2007-10-30 | Sony Deutschland Gmbh | Adaptive quality-of-service reservation and pre-allocation for mobile systems |
US20070263540A1 (en) | 2004-11-29 | 2007-11-15 | Joachim Charzinski | Method and Device for the Automatic Readjustment of Limits for Access Controls Used to Restrict Traffic in a Communication Network |
US20080137669A1 (en) | 2006-12-12 | 2008-06-12 | Nokia Corporation | Network of nodes |
US7408876B1 (en) | 2002-07-02 | 2008-08-05 | Extreme Networks | Method and apparatus for providing quality of service across a switched backplane between egress queue managers |
US20080192752A1 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2008-08-14 | Entropic Communications Inc. | Parameterized quality of service architecture in a network |
US20080225713A1 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2008-09-18 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Source routing approach for network performance and availability measurement of specific paths |
CN101313278A (en) | 2005-12-02 | 2008-11-26 | 国际商业机器公司 | Maintaining session states within virtual machine environments |
US20080298248A1 (en) | 2007-05-28 | 2008-12-04 | Guenter Roeck | Method and Apparatus For Computer Network Bandwidth Control and Congestion Management |
CN101335710A (en) | 2007-06-27 | 2008-12-31 | 全球帕克特有限公司 | Activating a tunnel upon receiving a control packet |
US20090052326A1 (en) | 2007-08-21 | 2009-02-26 | Cisco Technology, Inc., A Corporation Of California | Backward congestion notification |
CN101398770A (en) | 2007-09-30 | 2009-04-01 | 赛门铁克公司 | System for and method of migrating one or more virtual machines |
US20090089609A1 (en) | 2004-06-29 | 2009-04-02 | Tsunehiko Baba | Cluster system wherein failover reset signals are sent from nodes according to their priority |
US20090092046A1 (en) | 2006-04-05 | 2009-04-09 | Xyratex Technology Limited | Method for Congestion Management of a Network, a Switch, and a Network |
US20090180380A1 (en) | 2008-01-10 | 2009-07-16 | Nuova Systems, Inc. | Method and system to manage network traffic congestion |
US20090203350A1 (en) | 2006-09-08 | 2009-08-13 | Mgpatents, Llc | List-based emergency calling device |
US20090213861A1 (en) | 2008-02-21 | 2009-08-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Reliable Link Layer Packet Retry |
US20090231997A1 (en) | 2008-03-14 | 2009-09-17 | Motorola, Inc. | Method for displaying a packet switched congestion status of a wireless communication network |
US20090232001A1 (en) | 2008-03-11 | 2009-09-17 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Congestion Control in Wireless Mesh Networks |
WO2009113106A2 (en) | 2008-02-29 | 2009-09-17 | Gaurav Raina | Network communication |
US20090268614A1 (en) | 2006-12-18 | 2009-10-29 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Method and system for congestion marking |
US20100014487A1 (en) | 2003-03-13 | 2010-01-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and system for a data transmission in a communication system |
US20100027420A1 (en) | 2008-07-31 | 2010-02-04 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Dynamic distribution of virtual machines in a communication network |
US20100027424A1 (en) | 2008-07-30 | 2010-02-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Path Estimation in a Wireless Mesh Network |
CN101663590A (en) | 2007-04-20 | 2010-03-03 | 思科技术公司 | Parsing out of order data packets at a content gateway of a network |
CN101677321A (en) | 2008-09-16 | 2010-03-24 | 株式会社日立制作所 | Method and apparatus for storage migration |
US20100138686A1 (en) | 2008-11-26 | 2010-06-03 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Failure recovery method, failure recovery program and management server |
US20100142539A1 (en) | 2008-12-05 | 2010-06-10 | Mark Gooch | Packet processing indication |
US20100146327A1 (en) | 2008-12-05 | 2010-06-10 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Server failover control method and apparatus and computer system group |
US20100166424A1 (en) | 2004-04-15 | 2010-07-01 | Nagarajan Radhakrishnan L | COOLERLESS PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS (PICs) FOR WDM TRANSMISSION NETWORKS AND PICs OPERABLE WITH A FLOATING SIGNAL CHANNEL GRID CHANGING WITH TEMPERATURE BUT WITH FIXED CHANNEL SPACING IN THE FLOATING GRID |
US7765328B2 (en) | 2001-07-06 | 2010-07-27 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | Content service aggregation system |
US20100199275A1 (en) | 2009-01-30 | 2010-08-05 | Jayaram Mudigonda | Server switch integration in a virtualized system |
US20100211718A1 (en) | 2009-02-17 | 2010-08-19 | Paul Gratz | Method and apparatus for congestion-aware routing in a computer interconnection network |
US20100214970A1 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2010-08-26 | Nec Europe Ltd | Method and system for transmitting data packets from a source to multiple receivers via a network |
US20100238803A1 (en) | 2007-11-01 | 2010-09-23 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Efficient Flow Control in a Radio Network Controller (RNC) |
US20100238805A1 (en) | 2007-08-22 | 2010-09-23 | Reiner Ludwig | Data Transmission Control Methods And Devices |
US20100281178A1 (en) | 2009-04-29 | 2010-11-04 | Terence Sean Sullivan | Network Audio Distribution System and Method |
US20100302935A1 (en) | 2009-05-27 | 2010-12-02 | Yin Zhang | Method and system for resilient routing reconfiguration |
US20100303238A1 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2010-12-02 | Violeta Cakulev | Session Key Generation and Distribution with Multiple Security Associations per Protocol Instance |
US20100309781A1 (en) | 2009-06-03 | 2010-12-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Switching between mimo and receiver beam forming in a peer-to-peer network |
US20110026437A1 (en) | 2009-07-30 | 2011-02-03 | Roberto Roja-Cessa | Disseminating Link State Information to Nodes of a Network |
US20110031082A1 (en) | 2009-08-06 | 2011-02-10 | Chen-Lung Chi | Wheeled luggage device with brake |
US20110032821A1 (en) | 2006-08-22 | 2011-02-10 | Morrill Robert J | System and method for routing data on a packet network |
CN101997644A (en) | 2009-08-24 | 2011-03-30 | 华为技术有限公司 | Speed adjusting method, system and coding scheme selection method and system thereof |
WO2011037104A1 (en) | 2009-09-24 | 2011-03-31 | 日本電気株式会社 | Identification system for inter-virtual-server communication and identification method for inter-virtual-server communication |
WO2011037148A1 (en) | 2009-09-28 | 2011-03-31 | 日本電気株式会社 | Computer system, and migration method of virtual machine |
US20110085444A1 (en) | 2009-10-13 | 2011-04-14 | Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. | Flow autodetermination |
US20110090797A1 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2011-04-21 | Gnodal Limited | Method of data delivery across a network |
US7949893B1 (en) | 2008-04-30 | 2011-05-24 | Netapp, Inc. | Virtual user interface failover |
WO2011065268A1 (en) | 2009-11-26 | 2011-06-03 | 日本電気株式会社 | Load distribution system, load distribution method, and program |
US20110137772A1 (en) | 2009-12-07 | 2011-06-09 | At&T Mobility Ii Llc | Devices, Systems and Methods for SLA-Based Billing |
US20110135305A1 (en) | 2009-12-08 | 2011-06-09 | Vello Systems, Inc. | Optical Subchannel Routing, Protection Switching and Security |
US20110142450A1 (en) | 2009-12-11 | 2011-06-16 | Alberto Tanzi | Use of pre-validated paths in a wdm network |
US20110158647A1 (en) | 2001-07-19 | 2011-06-30 | Alan Glen Solheim | Wavelength Assignment In An Optical WDM Network |
US7978607B1 (en) | 2008-08-29 | 2011-07-12 | Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. | Source-based congestion detection and control |
US20110179415A1 (en) | 2010-01-20 | 2011-07-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Enablement and acceleration of live and near-live migration of virtual machines and their associated storage across networks |
US20110206025A1 (en) | 2008-08-01 | 2011-08-25 | Telefonica, S.A. | Access point which sends geographical positioning information from the access point to mobile terminals and mobile terminal which receives the information and estimates the position thereof based on said information |
JP2011166700A (en) | 2010-02-15 | 2011-08-25 | Nec Corp | Network system, and packet speculative transfer method |
US20110211834A1 (en) | 2009-08-13 | 2011-09-01 | New Jersey Institute Of Technology | Scheduling wdm pon with tunable lasers with different tuning times |
WO2011118575A1 (en) | 2010-03-24 | 2011-09-29 | 日本電気株式会社 | Communication system, control device and traffic monitoring method |
US20110242966A1 (en) | 2008-12-18 | 2011-10-06 | Alcatel Lucent | Method And Apparatus For Delivering Error-Critical Traffic Through A Packet-Switched Network |
US20110256865A1 (en) | 2010-04-15 | 2011-10-20 | Zulfiquar Sayeed | User Equipment Adjustment of Uplink Satellite Communications |
US20110261696A1 (en) | 2010-04-22 | 2011-10-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Network data congestion management probe system |
US20110261831A1 (en) | 2010-04-27 | 2011-10-27 | Puneet Sharma | Dynamic Priority Queue Level Assignment for a Network Flow |
US20110271007A1 (en) | 2010-04-28 | 2011-11-03 | Futurewei Technologies, Inc. | System and Method for a Context Layer Switch |
US20110273988A1 (en) | 2010-05-10 | 2011-11-10 | Jean Tourrilhes | Distributing decision making in a centralized flow routing system |
US20110283016A1 (en) | 2009-12-17 | 2011-11-17 | Nec Corporation | Load distribution system, load distribution method, apparatuses constituting load distribution system, and program |
US20110286324A1 (en) | 2010-05-19 | 2011-11-24 | Elisa Bellagamba | Link Failure Detection and Traffic Redirection in an Openflow Network |
US8069139B2 (en) | 2006-03-30 | 2011-11-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Transitioning of database service responsibility responsive to server failure in a partially clustered computing environment |
US20110292830A1 (en) | 2010-05-25 | 2011-12-01 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Method for enhancing table lookups with exact and wildcards matching for parallel environments |
US20110295996A1 (en) | 2010-05-28 | 2011-12-01 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods to improve overload protection for a home subscriber server (hss) |
US20110299389A1 (en) | 2009-12-04 | 2011-12-08 | Telcordia Technologies, Inc. | Real Time Monitoring, Onset Detection And Control Of Congestive Phase-Transitions in Communication Networks |
US20110305288A1 (en) | 2010-06-11 | 2011-12-15 | Yong Liu | Method and Apparatus for Determining Channel Bandwidth |
US20110305167A1 (en) | 2009-12-28 | 2011-12-15 | Nec Corporation | Communication system, and method of collecting port information |
US8082466B2 (en) | 2008-10-30 | 2011-12-20 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Storage device, and data path failover method of internal network of storage controller |
CN102291389A (en) | 2011-07-14 | 2011-12-21 | 南京邮电大学 | Cross-layer congestion control method in satellite network |
US20120008958A1 (en) | 2009-03-20 | 2012-01-12 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Method and devices for automatic tuning in wdp-pon |
US20120014693A1 (en) | 2010-07-13 | 2012-01-19 | Futurewei Technologies, Inc. | Passive Optical Network with Adaptive Filters for Upstream Transmission Management |
US20120014284A1 (en) | 2010-07-19 | 2012-01-19 | Raghuraman Ranganathan | Virtualized shared protection capacity |
US20120023231A1 (en) | 2009-10-23 | 2012-01-26 | Nec Corporation | Network system, control method for the same, and controller |
US20120020361A1 (en) | 2010-01-05 | 2012-01-26 | Nec Corporation | Switch network system, controller, and control method |
US20120030306A1 (en) | 2009-04-28 | 2012-02-02 | Nobuharu Kami | Rapid movement system for virtual devices in a computing system, management device, and method and program therefor |
US20120054079A1 (en) | 2009-09-30 | 2012-03-01 | Nec Corporation | Charging system and charging method |
US20120063316A1 (en) | 2010-09-10 | 2012-03-15 | Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. | Congestion notification across multiple layer-2 domains |
WO2012056816A1 (en) | 2010-10-28 | 2012-05-03 | 日本電気株式会社 | Network system and method for controlling communication traffic |
US20120163175A1 (en) | 2010-12-23 | 2012-06-28 | Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. | Ingress rate limiting |
CN102546385A (en) | 2010-12-15 | 2012-07-04 | 丛林网络公司 | Methods and apparatus for automatically provisioning resources within a distributed control plane of a switch |
US20120170477A1 (en) | 2010-01-14 | 2012-07-05 | Nec Corporation | Computer, communication system, network connection switching method, and program |
CN102611612A (en) | 2010-12-21 | 2012-07-25 | 微软公司 | Multi-path communications in a data center environment |
US20120195201A1 (en) * | 2011-02-02 | 2012-08-02 | Alaxala Networks Corporation | Bandwidth policing apparatus and packet relay apparatus |
US20120201140A1 (en) | 2009-10-06 | 2012-08-09 | Kazuya Suzuki | Network system, controller, method, and program |
US20120207175A1 (en) | 2011-02-11 | 2012-08-16 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Dynamic load balancing for port groups |
US20120221887A1 (en) | 2010-05-20 | 2012-08-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Migrating Virtual Machines Among Networked Servers Upon Detection Of Degrading Network Link Operation |
US20120287782A1 (en) | 2011-05-12 | 2012-11-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Programmable and high performance switch for data center networks |
US20130003735A1 (en) | 2011-06-28 | 2013-01-03 | Chao H Jonathan | Dynamically provisioning middleboxes |
US20130010600A1 (en) | 2011-07-08 | 2013-01-10 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Controller Driven OAM for OpenFlow |
US20130054761A1 (en) | 2011-08-29 | 2013-02-28 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Implementing a 3G Packet Core in a Cloud Computer with Openflow Data and Control Planes |
US20130058345A1 (en) | 2011-09-01 | 2013-03-07 | Fujitsu Limited | Apparatus and Method for Establishing Tunnels Between Nodes in a Communication Network |
US8429282B1 (en) | 2011-03-22 | 2013-04-23 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | System and method for avoiding system overload by maintaining an ideal request rate |
US20130124683A1 (en) | 2010-07-20 | 2013-05-16 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Data distribution system, data distribution method, data relay device on distribution side, and data relay device on reception side |
US20130144995A1 (en) | 2010-09-03 | 2013-06-06 | Shuji Ishii | Control apparatus, a communication system, a communication method and a recording medium having recorded thereon a communication program |
US20130159415A1 (en) | 2010-06-07 | 2013-06-20 | Kansai University | Congestion control system, congestion control method, and communication unit |
US20130162038A1 (en) | 2010-04-22 | 2013-06-27 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Apparatus and method for stabilizing an electrical power import |
US20130176850A1 (en) | 2012-01-09 | 2013-07-11 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericcson (Publ) | Expanding network functionalities for openflow based split-architecture networks |
US20130205002A1 (en) | 2012-02-02 | 2013-08-08 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Wide area network optimization |
US20130212578A1 (en) | 2012-02-14 | 2013-08-15 | Vipin Garg | Optimizing traffic load in a communications network |
US20130250770A1 (en) | 2012-03-22 | 2013-09-26 | Futurewei Technologies, Inc. | Supporting Software Defined Networking with Application Layer Traffic Optimization |
US20130258847A1 (en) * | 2012-04-03 | 2013-10-03 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Congestion Control and Resource Allocation in Split Architecture Networks |
US20130258843A1 (en) | 2012-03-29 | 2013-10-03 | Fujitsu Limited | Network system and apparatis |
US20130266317A1 (en) | 1999-07-29 | 2013-10-10 | Rockstar Consortium Us Lp | Optical switch and protocols for use therewith |
US20130268686A1 (en) | 2012-03-14 | 2013-10-10 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Method, switch, server and system for sending connection establishment request |
US20130294236A1 (en) | 2012-05-04 | 2013-11-07 | Neda Beheshti-Zavareh | Congestion control in packet data networking |
US20140006630A1 (en) | 2012-06-28 | 2014-01-02 | Yigang Cai | Session initiation protocol (sip) for message throttling |
US20140010235A1 (en) | 2011-03-18 | 2014-01-09 | Nec Corporation | Network system and switching method thereof |
US8630307B2 (en) | 2011-09-13 | 2014-01-14 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for traffic contention resource allocation |
US20140016476A1 (en) | 2011-03-24 | 2014-01-16 | Nec Europe Ltd. | Method for operating a flow-based switching system and switching system |
US20140016647A1 (en) | 2011-03-29 | 2014-01-16 | Hirokazu Yoshida | Network system and vlan tag data acquiring method |
US20140040526A1 (en) | 2012-07-31 | 2014-02-06 | Bruce J. Chang | Coherent data forwarding when link congestion occurs in a multi-node coherent system |
US20140092907A1 (en) | 2012-08-14 | 2014-04-03 | Vmware, Inc. | Method and system for virtual and physical network integration |
US20140108632A1 (en) | 2012-10-15 | 2014-04-17 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method for efficient use of flow table space in a network environment |
US20140119193A1 (en) | 2012-10-30 | 2014-05-01 | Telefonaktiebolget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Method for dynamic load balancing of network flows on lag interfaces |
US20140126907A1 (en) | 2012-11-05 | 2014-05-08 | Broadcom Corporation | Data rate control in an optical line terminal |
US8724470B2 (en) | 2009-10-01 | 2014-05-13 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method of controlling data flow in wireless communication system |
US20140169189A1 (en) | 2012-12-17 | 2014-06-19 | Broadcom Corporation | Network Status Mapping |
US20140178066A1 (en) | 2012-11-07 | 2014-06-26 | Nec Laboratories America, Inc. | QoS-aware united control protocol for optical burst switching in software defined optical netoworks |
US20140192646A1 (en) | 2011-03-29 | 2014-07-10 | Nec Europe Ltd. | User traffic accountability under congestion in flow-based multi-layer switches |
US20140198648A1 (en) * | 2013-01-15 | 2014-07-17 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Identification of data flows based on actions of quality of service policies |
US20140258774A1 (en) | 2004-04-22 | 2014-09-11 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods and systems for automatically tracking the rerouting of logical circuit data in a data network |
US20140301204A1 (en) | 2011-11-10 | 2014-10-09 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Mobile communication method, policy and charging rule server apparatus, and mobile management node |
US8953453B1 (en) | 2011-12-15 | 2015-02-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | System and method for throttling service requests using work-based tokens |
-
2013
- 2013-03-15 US US13/833,886 patent/US9769074B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (170)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5694390A (en) | 1993-09-06 | 1997-12-02 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Method and apparatus for controlling congestion in communication network |
US6094418A (en) | 1996-03-07 | 2000-07-25 | Fujitsu Limited | Feedback control method and device in ATM switching system |
US5905711A (en) | 1996-03-28 | 1999-05-18 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling data transfer rates using marking threshold in asynchronous transfer mode networks |
GB2313268A (en) | 1996-05-17 | 1997-11-19 | Motorola Ltd | Transmitting data with error correction |
US6504821B2 (en) | 1996-06-12 | 2003-01-07 | At&T Corp. | Flexible bandwidth negotiation for the block transfer of data |
US5966546A (en) | 1996-09-12 | 1999-10-12 | Cabletron Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing TX raw cell status report frequency and interrupt frequency mitigation in a network node |
US6208619B1 (en) | 1997-03-27 | 2001-03-27 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Packet data flow control method and device |
US6356944B1 (en) | 1997-03-31 | 2002-03-12 | Compaq Information Technologies Group, L.P. | System and method for increasing write performance in a fibre channel environment |
EP0876023A1 (en) | 1997-04-30 | 1998-11-04 | Sony Corporation | Transmitter and transmitting method, receiver and receiving method, and transceiver and transmitting/receiving method |
WO1999030462A2 (en) | 1997-12-12 | 1999-06-17 | 3Com Corporation | A forward error correction system for packet based real-time media |
US20020181484A1 (en) | 1998-04-01 | 2002-12-05 | Takeshi Aimoto | Packet switch and switching method for switching variable length packets |
US6813246B1 (en) | 1998-08-06 | 2004-11-02 | Alcatel | Routing calls with overflows in a private network |
US20010056459A1 (en) | 1998-08-31 | 2001-12-27 | Yoshitoshi Kurose | Service assignment apparatus |
US6795399B1 (en) | 1998-11-24 | 2004-09-21 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Link capacity computation methods and apparatus for designing IP networks with performance guarantees |
US6504818B1 (en) | 1998-12-03 | 2003-01-07 | At&T Corp. | Fair share egress queuing scheme for data networks |
US20130266317A1 (en) | 1999-07-29 | 2013-10-10 | Rockstar Consortium Us Lp | Optical switch and protocols for use therewith |
US20020073354A1 (en) | 2000-07-28 | 2002-06-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Cascading failover of a data management application for shared disk file systems in loosely coupled node clusters |
US6975592B1 (en) | 2000-11-22 | 2005-12-13 | Nortel Networks Limited | Configurable rule-engine for layer-7 and traffic characteristic-based classification |
US6947380B1 (en) | 2000-12-01 | 2005-09-20 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Guaranteed bandwidth mechanism for a terabit multiservice switch |
US20020159386A1 (en) | 2001-04-30 | 2002-10-31 | Gilbert Grosdidier | Method for dynamical identification of network congestion characteristics |
US20120243476A1 (en) | 2001-06-25 | 2012-09-27 | Eyuboglu M Vedat | Radio network control |
US20020196749A1 (en) | 2001-06-25 | 2002-12-26 | Eyuboglu M. Vedat | Radio network control |
US7765328B2 (en) | 2001-07-06 | 2010-07-27 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | Content service aggregation system |
US20110158647A1 (en) | 2001-07-19 | 2011-06-30 | Alan Glen Solheim | Wavelength Assignment In An Optical WDM Network |
US20030051187A1 (en) | 2001-08-09 | 2003-03-13 | Victor Mashayekhi | Failover system and method for cluster environment |
US7289453B2 (en) | 2001-12-13 | 2007-10-30 | Sony Deutschland Gmbh | Adaptive quality-of-service reservation and pre-allocation for mobile systems |
US7187652B2 (en) | 2001-12-26 | 2007-03-06 | Tropic Networks Inc. | Multi-constraint routing system and method |
US7408876B1 (en) | 2002-07-02 | 2008-08-05 | Extreme Networks | Method and apparatus for providing quality of service across a switched backplane between egress queue managers |
US20040153866A1 (en) | 2002-11-15 | 2004-08-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Markov model of availability for clustered systems |
US20040170123A1 (en) | 2003-02-27 | 2004-09-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for managing of denial of service attacks using bandwidth allocation technology |
US20040179476A1 (en) | 2003-03-10 | 2004-09-16 | Sung-Ha Kim | Apparatus and method for controlling a traffic switching operation based on a service class in an ethernet-based network |
US20100014487A1 (en) | 2003-03-13 | 2010-01-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and system for a data transmission in a communication system |
US20040199609A1 (en) | 2003-04-07 | 2004-10-07 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for web server migration |
US20040228278A1 (en) | 2003-05-13 | 2004-11-18 | Corrigent Systems, Ltd. | Bandwidth allocation for link aggregation |
US7234073B1 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2007-06-19 | Emc Corporation | System and methods for failover management of manageable entity agents |
US20060203828A1 (en) | 2003-10-02 | 2006-09-14 | Masayuki Kumazawa | Router selecting method and router apparatus |
US20100166424A1 (en) | 2004-04-15 | 2010-07-01 | Nagarajan Radhakrishnan L | COOLERLESS PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS (PICs) FOR WDM TRANSMISSION NETWORKS AND PICs OPERABLE WITH A FLOATING SIGNAL CHANNEL GRID CHANGING WITH TEMPERATURE BUT WITH FIXED CHANNEL SPACING IN THE FLOATING GRID |
US20140258774A1 (en) | 2004-04-22 | 2014-09-11 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods and systems for automatically tracking the rerouting of logical circuit data in a data network |
US20090089609A1 (en) | 2004-06-29 | 2009-04-02 | Tsunehiko Baba | Cluster system wherein failover reset signals are sent from nodes according to their priority |
US20070263540A1 (en) | 2004-11-29 | 2007-11-15 | Joachim Charzinski | Method and Device for the Automatic Readjustment of Limits for Access Controls Used to Restrict Traffic in a Communication Network |
US20060126509A1 (en) | 2004-12-09 | 2006-06-15 | Firas Abi-Nassif | Traffic management in a wireless data network |
US20060187874A1 (en) | 2005-02-24 | 2006-08-24 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for supporting data flow control in a wireless mesh network |
US20060209695A1 (en) | 2005-03-15 | 2006-09-21 | Archer Shafford R Jr | Load balancing in a distributed telecommunications platform |
US20060215550A1 (en) | 2005-03-23 | 2006-09-28 | Richa Malhotra | Method and apparatus for flow control of data in a network |
US20070081454A1 (en) | 2005-10-11 | 2007-04-12 | Cisco Technology, Inc. A Corporation Of California | Methods and devices for backward congestion notification |
CN101313278A (en) | 2005-12-02 | 2008-11-26 | 国际商业机器公司 | Maintaining session states within virtual machine environments |
US20070183332A1 (en) | 2006-02-06 | 2007-08-09 | Jong-Sang Oh | System and method for backward congestion notification in network |
US20070204266A1 (en) | 2006-02-28 | 2007-08-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Systems and methods for dynamically managing virtual machines |
US20070220121A1 (en) | 2006-03-18 | 2007-09-20 | Ignatia Suwarna | Virtual machine migration between servers |
US8069139B2 (en) | 2006-03-30 | 2011-11-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Transitioning of database service responsibility responsive to server failure in a partially clustered computing environment |
US20090092046A1 (en) | 2006-04-05 | 2009-04-09 | Xyratex Technology Limited | Method for Congestion Management of a Network, a Switch, and a Network |
US20110032821A1 (en) | 2006-08-22 | 2011-02-10 | Morrill Robert J | System and method for routing data on a packet network |
US20090203350A1 (en) | 2006-09-08 | 2009-08-13 | Mgpatents, Llc | List-based emergency calling device |
US20080137669A1 (en) | 2006-12-12 | 2008-06-12 | Nokia Corporation | Network of nodes |
US20090268614A1 (en) | 2006-12-18 | 2009-10-29 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Method and system for congestion marking |
US20080192752A1 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2008-08-14 | Entropic Communications Inc. | Parameterized quality of service architecture in a network |
US20080225713A1 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2008-09-18 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Source routing approach for network performance and availability measurement of specific paths |
CN101663590A (en) | 2007-04-20 | 2010-03-03 | 思科技术公司 | Parsing out of order data packets at a content gateway of a network |
US20080298248A1 (en) | 2007-05-28 | 2008-12-04 | Guenter Roeck | Method and Apparatus For Computer Network Bandwidth Control and Congestion Management |
CN101335710A (en) | 2007-06-27 | 2008-12-31 | 全球帕克特有限公司 | Activating a tunnel upon receiving a control packet |
US20090052326A1 (en) | 2007-08-21 | 2009-02-26 | Cisco Technology, Inc., A Corporation Of California | Backward congestion notification |
US20100238805A1 (en) | 2007-08-22 | 2010-09-23 | Reiner Ludwig | Data Transmission Control Methods And Devices |
US20100214970A1 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2010-08-26 | Nec Europe Ltd | Method and system for transmitting data packets from a source to multiple receivers via a network |
CN101398770A (en) | 2007-09-30 | 2009-04-01 | 赛门铁克公司 | System for and method of migrating one or more virtual machines |
US20100238803A1 (en) | 2007-11-01 | 2010-09-23 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Efficient Flow Control in a Radio Network Controller (RNC) |
US20090180380A1 (en) | 2008-01-10 | 2009-07-16 | Nuova Systems, Inc. | Method and system to manage network traffic congestion |
US20090213861A1 (en) | 2008-02-21 | 2009-08-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Reliable Link Layer Packet Retry |
WO2009113106A2 (en) | 2008-02-29 | 2009-09-17 | Gaurav Raina | Network communication |
US20090232001A1 (en) | 2008-03-11 | 2009-09-17 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Congestion Control in Wireless Mesh Networks |
US20090231997A1 (en) | 2008-03-14 | 2009-09-17 | Motorola, Inc. | Method for displaying a packet switched congestion status of a wireless communication network |
US7949893B1 (en) | 2008-04-30 | 2011-05-24 | Netapp, Inc. | Virtual user interface failover |
US20110090797A1 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2011-04-21 | Gnodal Limited | Method of data delivery across a network |
US20100027424A1 (en) | 2008-07-30 | 2010-02-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Path Estimation in a Wireless Mesh Network |
US20100027420A1 (en) | 2008-07-31 | 2010-02-04 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Dynamic distribution of virtual machines in a communication network |
US20110206025A1 (en) | 2008-08-01 | 2011-08-25 | Telefonica, S.A. | Access point which sends geographical positioning information from the access point to mobile terminals and mobile terminal which receives the information and estimates the position thereof based on said information |
US7978607B1 (en) | 2008-08-29 | 2011-07-12 | Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. | Source-based congestion detection and control |
CN101677321A (en) | 2008-09-16 | 2010-03-24 | 株式会社日立制作所 | Method and apparatus for storage migration |
US8082466B2 (en) | 2008-10-30 | 2011-12-20 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Storage device, and data path failover method of internal network of storage controller |
US20100138686A1 (en) | 2008-11-26 | 2010-06-03 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Failure recovery method, failure recovery program and management server |
US20100146327A1 (en) | 2008-12-05 | 2010-06-10 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Server failover control method and apparatus and computer system group |
US20100142539A1 (en) | 2008-12-05 | 2010-06-10 | Mark Gooch | Packet processing indication |
US20110242966A1 (en) | 2008-12-18 | 2011-10-06 | Alcatel Lucent | Method And Apparatus For Delivering Error-Critical Traffic Through A Packet-Switched Network |
US20100199275A1 (en) | 2009-01-30 | 2010-08-05 | Jayaram Mudigonda | Server switch integration in a virtualized system |
US20100211718A1 (en) | 2009-02-17 | 2010-08-19 | Paul Gratz | Method and apparatus for congestion-aware routing in a computer interconnection network |
US20120008958A1 (en) | 2009-03-20 | 2012-01-12 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Method and devices for automatic tuning in wdp-pon |
US20120030306A1 (en) | 2009-04-28 | 2012-02-02 | Nobuharu Kami | Rapid movement system for virtual devices in a computing system, management device, and method and program therefor |
US20100281178A1 (en) | 2009-04-29 | 2010-11-04 | Terence Sean Sullivan | Network Audio Distribution System and Method |
US20100302935A1 (en) | 2009-05-27 | 2010-12-02 | Yin Zhang | Method and system for resilient routing reconfiguration |
US20100303238A1 (en) | 2009-05-29 | 2010-12-02 | Violeta Cakulev | Session Key Generation and Distribution with Multiple Security Associations per Protocol Instance |
US20100309781A1 (en) | 2009-06-03 | 2010-12-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Switching between mimo and receiver beam forming in a peer-to-peer network |
US20110026437A1 (en) | 2009-07-30 | 2011-02-03 | Roberto Roja-Cessa | Disseminating Link State Information to Nodes of a Network |
US20110031082A1 (en) | 2009-08-06 | 2011-02-10 | Chen-Lung Chi | Wheeled luggage device with brake |
US20110211834A1 (en) | 2009-08-13 | 2011-09-01 | New Jersey Institute Of Technology | Scheduling wdm pon with tunable lasers with different tuning times |
CN101997644A (en) | 2009-08-24 | 2011-03-30 | 华为技术有限公司 | Speed adjusting method, system and coding scheme selection method and system thereof |
WO2011037104A1 (en) | 2009-09-24 | 2011-03-31 | 日本電気株式会社 | Identification system for inter-virtual-server communication and identification method for inter-virtual-server communication |
WO2011037148A1 (en) | 2009-09-28 | 2011-03-31 | 日本電気株式会社 | Computer system, and migration method of virtual machine |
US20120054079A1 (en) | 2009-09-30 | 2012-03-01 | Nec Corporation | Charging system and charging method |
US8724470B2 (en) | 2009-10-01 | 2014-05-13 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method of controlling data flow in wireless communication system |
US20120201140A1 (en) | 2009-10-06 | 2012-08-09 | Kazuya Suzuki | Network system, controller, method, and program |
US20110085444A1 (en) | 2009-10-13 | 2011-04-14 | Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. | Flow autodetermination |
US20120023231A1 (en) | 2009-10-23 | 2012-01-26 | Nec Corporation | Network system, control method for the same, and controller |
US20120250496A1 (en) | 2009-11-26 | 2012-10-04 | Takeshi Kato | Load distribution system, load distribution method, and program |
WO2011065268A1 (en) | 2009-11-26 | 2011-06-03 | 日本電気株式会社 | Load distribution system, load distribution method, and program |
US20110299389A1 (en) | 2009-12-04 | 2011-12-08 | Telcordia Technologies, Inc. | Real Time Monitoring, Onset Detection And Control Of Congestive Phase-Transitions in Communication Networks |
US20110137772A1 (en) | 2009-12-07 | 2011-06-09 | At&T Mobility Ii Llc | Devices, Systems and Methods for SLA-Based Billing |
US20110135305A1 (en) | 2009-12-08 | 2011-06-09 | Vello Systems, Inc. | Optical Subchannel Routing, Protection Switching and Security |
US20110158658A1 (en) | 2009-12-08 | 2011-06-30 | Vello Systems, Inc. | Optical Subchannel-Based Cyclical Filter Architecture |
US20110142450A1 (en) | 2009-12-11 | 2011-06-16 | Alberto Tanzi | Use of pre-validated paths in a wdm network |
US20110283016A1 (en) | 2009-12-17 | 2011-11-17 | Nec Corporation | Load distribution system, load distribution method, apparatuses constituting load distribution system, and program |
US20110305167A1 (en) | 2009-12-28 | 2011-12-15 | Nec Corporation | Communication system, and method of collecting port information |
US20120020361A1 (en) | 2010-01-05 | 2012-01-26 | Nec Corporation | Switch network system, controller, and control method |
US20120170477A1 (en) | 2010-01-14 | 2012-07-05 | Nec Corporation | Computer, communication system, network connection switching method, and program |
US20110179415A1 (en) | 2010-01-20 | 2011-07-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Enablement and acceleration of live and near-live migration of virtual machines and their associated storage across networks |
JP2011166700A (en) | 2010-02-15 | 2011-08-25 | Nec Corp | Network system, and packet speculative transfer method |
WO2011118575A1 (en) | 2010-03-24 | 2011-09-29 | 日本電気株式会社 | Communication system, control device and traffic monitoring method |
US20110256865A1 (en) | 2010-04-15 | 2011-10-20 | Zulfiquar Sayeed | User Equipment Adjustment of Uplink Satellite Communications |
US20110261696A1 (en) | 2010-04-22 | 2011-10-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Network data congestion management probe system |
US20130162038A1 (en) | 2010-04-22 | 2013-06-27 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Apparatus and method for stabilizing an electrical power import |
US20110261831A1 (en) | 2010-04-27 | 2011-10-27 | Puneet Sharma | Dynamic Priority Queue Level Assignment for a Network Flow |
US20110271007A1 (en) | 2010-04-28 | 2011-11-03 | Futurewei Technologies, Inc. | System and Method for a Context Layer Switch |
US20110273988A1 (en) | 2010-05-10 | 2011-11-10 | Jean Tourrilhes | Distributing decision making in a centralized flow routing system |
US20110286324A1 (en) | 2010-05-19 | 2011-11-24 | Elisa Bellagamba | Link Failure Detection and Traffic Redirection in an Openflow Network |
US20120221887A1 (en) | 2010-05-20 | 2012-08-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Migrating Virtual Machines Among Networked Servers Upon Detection Of Degrading Network Link Operation |
US20110292830A1 (en) | 2010-05-25 | 2011-12-01 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Method for enhancing table lookups with exact and wildcards matching for parallel environments |
US20110295996A1 (en) | 2010-05-28 | 2011-12-01 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods to improve overload protection for a home subscriber server (hss) |
US20130159415A1 (en) | 2010-06-07 | 2013-06-20 | Kansai University | Congestion control system, congestion control method, and communication unit |
US20110305288A1 (en) | 2010-06-11 | 2011-12-15 | Yong Liu | Method and Apparatus for Determining Channel Bandwidth |
US20120014693A1 (en) | 2010-07-13 | 2012-01-19 | Futurewei Technologies, Inc. | Passive Optical Network with Adaptive Filters for Upstream Transmission Management |
US20120014284A1 (en) | 2010-07-19 | 2012-01-19 | Raghuraman Ranganathan | Virtualized shared protection capacity |
US20130124683A1 (en) | 2010-07-20 | 2013-05-16 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Data distribution system, data distribution method, data relay device on distribution side, and data relay device on reception side |
US20130144995A1 (en) | 2010-09-03 | 2013-06-06 | Shuji Ishii | Control apparatus, a communication system, a communication method and a recording medium having recorded thereon a communication program |
US20120063316A1 (en) | 2010-09-10 | 2012-03-15 | Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. | Congestion notification across multiple layer-2 domains |
WO2012056816A1 (en) | 2010-10-28 | 2012-05-03 | 日本電気株式会社 | Network system and method for controlling communication traffic |
CN102546385A (en) | 2010-12-15 | 2012-07-04 | 丛林网络公司 | Methods and apparatus for automatically provisioning resources within a distributed control plane of a switch |
CN102611612A (en) | 2010-12-21 | 2012-07-25 | 微软公司 | Multi-path communications in a data center environment |
US20120163175A1 (en) | 2010-12-23 | 2012-06-28 | Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. | Ingress rate limiting |
US20120195201A1 (en) * | 2011-02-02 | 2012-08-02 | Alaxala Networks Corporation | Bandwidth policing apparatus and packet relay apparatus |
US20120207175A1 (en) | 2011-02-11 | 2012-08-16 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Dynamic load balancing for port groups |
US20140010235A1 (en) | 2011-03-18 | 2014-01-09 | Nec Corporation | Network system and switching method thereof |
US8429282B1 (en) | 2011-03-22 | 2013-04-23 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | System and method for avoiding system overload by maintaining an ideal request rate |
US20140016476A1 (en) | 2011-03-24 | 2014-01-16 | Nec Europe Ltd. | Method for operating a flow-based switching system and switching system |
US20140192646A1 (en) | 2011-03-29 | 2014-07-10 | Nec Europe Ltd. | User traffic accountability under congestion in flow-based multi-layer switches |
US20140016647A1 (en) | 2011-03-29 | 2014-01-16 | Hirokazu Yoshida | Network system and vlan tag data acquiring method |
US20120287782A1 (en) | 2011-05-12 | 2012-11-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Programmable and high performance switch for data center networks |
US20130003735A1 (en) | 2011-06-28 | 2013-01-03 | Chao H Jonathan | Dynamically provisioning middleboxes |
US20130010600A1 (en) | 2011-07-08 | 2013-01-10 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Controller Driven OAM for OpenFlow |
CN102291389A (en) | 2011-07-14 | 2011-12-21 | 南京邮电大学 | Cross-layer congestion control method in satellite network |
US8762501B2 (en) | 2011-08-29 | 2014-06-24 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Implementing a 3G packet core in a cloud computer with openflow data and control planes |
US20130054761A1 (en) | 2011-08-29 | 2013-02-28 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Implementing a 3G Packet Core in a Cloud Computer with Openflow Data and Control Planes |
US20130058345A1 (en) | 2011-09-01 | 2013-03-07 | Fujitsu Limited | Apparatus and Method for Establishing Tunnels Between Nodes in a Communication Network |
US8630307B2 (en) | 2011-09-13 | 2014-01-14 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for traffic contention resource allocation |
US20140301204A1 (en) | 2011-11-10 | 2014-10-09 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Mobile communication method, policy and charging rule server apparatus, and mobile management node |
US8953453B1 (en) | 2011-12-15 | 2015-02-10 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | System and method for throttling service requests using work-based tokens |
US20130176850A1 (en) | 2012-01-09 | 2013-07-11 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericcson (Publ) | Expanding network functionalities for openflow based split-architecture networks |
US20130205002A1 (en) | 2012-02-02 | 2013-08-08 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Wide area network optimization |
US20130212578A1 (en) | 2012-02-14 | 2013-08-15 | Vipin Garg | Optimizing traffic load in a communications network |
US20130268686A1 (en) | 2012-03-14 | 2013-10-10 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Method, switch, server and system for sending connection establishment request |
US20130250770A1 (en) | 2012-03-22 | 2013-09-26 | Futurewei Technologies, Inc. | Supporting Software Defined Networking with Application Layer Traffic Optimization |
US20130258843A1 (en) | 2012-03-29 | 2013-10-03 | Fujitsu Limited | Network system and apparatis |
US20130258847A1 (en) * | 2012-04-03 | 2013-10-03 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Congestion Control and Resource Allocation in Split Architecture Networks |
US20130294236A1 (en) | 2012-05-04 | 2013-11-07 | Neda Beheshti-Zavareh | Congestion control in packet data networking |
US20140006630A1 (en) | 2012-06-28 | 2014-01-02 | Yigang Cai | Session initiation protocol (sip) for message throttling |
US20140040526A1 (en) | 2012-07-31 | 2014-02-06 | Bruce J. Chang | Coherent data forwarding when link congestion occurs in a multi-node coherent system |
US20140092907A1 (en) | 2012-08-14 | 2014-04-03 | Vmware, Inc. | Method and system for virtual and physical network integration |
US20140108632A1 (en) | 2012-10-15 | 2014-04-17 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method for efficient use of flow table space in a network environment |
US20140119193A1 (en) | 2012-10-30 | 2014-05-01 | Telefonaktiebolget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Method for dynamic load balancing of network flows on lag interfaces |
US20140126907A1 (en) | 2012-11-05 | 2014-05-08 | Broadcom Corporation | Data rate control in an optical line terminal |
US20140178066A1 (en) | 2012-11-07 | 2014-06-26 | Nec Laboratories America, Inc. | QoS-aware united control protocol for optical burst switching in software defined optical netoworks |
US20140169189A1 (en) | 2012-12-17 | 2014-06-19 | Broadcom Corporation | Network Status Mapping |
US20140198648A1 (en) * | 2013-01-15 | 2014-07-17 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Identification of data flows based on actions of quality of service policies |
Non-Patent Citations (38)
Title |
---|
Anonymous; "Intelligent VM Migration Based on Relative VM Priority and Relative Suitability of Migration Target"; https://priorartdatabase.com/IPCOM/000201632; Nov. 16, 2010, 3 pages. |
Anonymous; "Management framework for efficient live migration of virtual machines running migration-aware applications";https://priorartdatabase.com/IPCOM000200260; Oct. 3, 2010, 5 pages. |
Curtis, et al. "DevoFlow: Scaling Flow Management for High-Performance Netowrks". SIGCOMM'11, Aug. 15-19, 2011, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. |
Egilmez, et al. "Scalable video streaming over OpenFlow networks: An optimization framework for QoS Routing". 2011 18th IEEE International Confernece on Image Processing (ICIP), 2241-2244. |
El-Azzab, et al. "Slices isolator for a virtualized openflow node", (2011) First International Symposium on Network Cloud Computing and Applications (NCCA), 121-126. |
IBM "Software Defined Networking, a new paradigm for virtual dynamic, flexible networking," IBM Systems and Technology, Oct. 2012, 6 pages. |
IBM; "The automatic determination of master-slave relationship between embedded controllers by mearns of a shared hardware access switch"; https://www.ip.com/pubview/IPCOM000020741D; Dec. 11, 2003, 5 pages. |
Johnson, RD.et al.; "Detection of a Working Master Controller by a Slave Card"; https://www.ip.com/pubview/IPCOM000099594D; Feb. 1, 1990, 3 pages. |
Li, Z., et al. Compatib le TDM/WDM PON using a Single Tunable Optical Filter for both Downstream Wavelength Selection and Upstream Wavelength Generation. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 24, No. 10, May 15, 2012. pp. 797-799. |
Liu, et al. "Open Flow-based Wavelength Path Control in Transparent Optical networks: a Proof-of-Concept Demonstration" Sep. 2011, 37th European conference and Exhibition on Optical communication (ECOC). |
McKeown et al., "OpenFlow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks", Mar. 14, 2008, 6 pages. |
McKeown, et al. "OpenFlow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks". ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(2), 69-74. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration; PCT/IB2014/059457; Mailed Jul. 1, 2014, 6 pages. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, Application No. PCT/IB2014/059459; International Filing Date: Mar. 5, 2014; Date of Mailing: Jun. 30, 2014; 10 pages. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, Application No. PCT/IB2014/059460; International Filing Date: Mar. 5, 2014; Date of Mailing: Jun. 30, 2014; 9 pages. |
Pfaff, B.et al.; "Open Flow Switch Specification"; www.openflow.org/document/openflow-spec-v1.0.0.pdf; Feb. 28, 2011, 56 pages. |
Pfaff, B.et al.; "Open Flow Switch Specification"; www.openflow.org/document/openflow—spec—v1.0.0.pdf; Feb. 28, 2011, 56 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/833,796, filed Mar. 15, 2013; Final office action; Date Mailed: Jan. 15, 2016; 18 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/833,796; filed Mar. 15, 2013; Non-Final Office Action; Date Mailed: Jul. 30, 2015, 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/833,796; Non-final Office Action ; filed Mar. 15, 2013; Date Mailed: Dec. 19, 2014; 31pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/833,952, Final Office Action; filed Mar. 15, 2013; Date Mailed: Apr. 16, 2015; 25 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/833,952; Non-Final Office Action, filed Mar. 15, 2013; Date Mailed: Aug. 5, 2015; 25 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/833,952; Non-Final Office Action; filed Mar. 15, 2013; Date Mailed: Nov. 3, 2014; 39 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/834,117, filed Mar. 15, 2013; Non-final office Action; Date Mailed: Dec. 16, 2015; 30 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/834,117; filed Mar. 15, 2013; Final Office Action; Date Mailed: Jul. 17, 2015, 31 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/834,117; Non-Final Office Action; filed Mar. 15, 2013; Date Mailed: Feb. 26, 2015, 61 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/834,502; Final Office Action; filed Mar. 15, 2013; Date Mailed: Jun. 29, 2015; 26 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/834,502; Non-Final Office Action; filed Mar. 15, 2013; Date Mailed: Dec. 4, 2014; 37 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/501,457; Final Office Action; filed Sep. 30, 2014; Date Mailed: Jun. 29, 2015; 28 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/501,663, filed Sep. 30, 2014; Final Office Action; Date Mailed: Apr. 9, 2015; 25 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/501,663, filed Sep. 30, 2014; Final office action; Date Mailed: Jan. 20, 2016; 15 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/501,663; Non-Final Office Action; filed Sep. 30, 2014; Date Mailed: Dec. 19, 2014; 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/501,945; Final Office Action: filed Sep. 30, 2014; Date Mailed: Jul. 16, 2015; 30 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/501,945; Non-Final Office Action, filed Sep. 30, 2014; Date Mailed: Jan. 5, 2015; 29 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/501,945; Non-final Office Action; filed Sep. 30, 2014; Date Mailed: Nov. 30, 2015; 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/502,043; Non-Final Office Action; filed Sep. 30, 2014; Date Mailed: Dec. 23, 2014; 17 pages. |
Wang et al., "Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation for Preventing Congestion in Data Center Networks," ISNN 2011, Part III, LNCS 6677, pp. 160-167, 2011. |
Yong, S. et al, "XOR Retransmission in Multicast Error Recovery". Networks, 2000 (ICON2000). Proceedings. IEEE International Conference. pp. 336-340. |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20170180240A1 (en) * | 2015-12-16 | 2017-06-22 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Openflow configured horizontally split hybrid sdn nodes |
US10171336B2 (en) * | 2015-12-16 | 2019-01-01 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Openflow configured horizontally split hybrid SDN nodes |
US10057170B2 (en) * | 2016-09-23 | 2018-08-21 | Gigamon Inc. | Intelligent dropping of packets in a network visibility fabric |
US20180351866A1 (en) * | 2016-09-23 | 2018-12-06 | Gigamon Inc. | Intelligent Dropping of Packets in a Network Visibility Fabric |
US10931582B2 (en) * | 2016-09-23 | 2021-02-23 | Gigamon Inc. | Intelligent dropping of packets in a network visibility fabric |
US10419350B2 (en) * | 2017-10-06 | 2019-09-17 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp | Packet admission |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20140269319A1 (en) | 2014-09-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9769074B2 (en) | Network per-flow rate limiting | |
US10484518B2 (en) | Dynamic port type detection | |
US9407560B2 (en) | Software defined network-based load balancing for physical and virtual networks | |
US9503382B2 (en) | Scalable flow and cogestion control with openflow | |
US9614930B2 (en) | Virtual machine mobility using OpenFlow | |
US9237110B2 (en) | Dynamic maximum transmission unit size adaption | |
US9590923B2 (en) | Reliable link layer for control links between network controllers and switches | |
US10075396B2 (en) | Methods and systems for managing distributed media access control address tables | |
US9071529B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for accelerating forwarding in software-defined networks | |
US9621482B2 (en) | Servers, switches, and systems with switching module implementing a distributed network operating system | |
US9742697B2 (en) | Integrated server with switching capabilities and network operating system | |
US10237130B2 (en) | Method for processing VxLAN data units | |
US8630296B2 (en) | Shared and separate network stack instances | |
US20190052564A1 (en) | Network element with congestion-aware match tables | |
US20160149817A1 (en) | Analysis device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW Y Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DECUSATIS, CASIMER;KRISHNAMURTHY, RAJARAM B.;REEL/FRAME:030012/0058 Effective date: 20130312 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: SURCHARGE FOR LATE PAYMENT, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1554); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AWEMANE LTD., CAYMAN ISLANDS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:057991/0960 Effective date: 20210826 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BEIJING PIANRUOJINGHONG TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., CHINA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:AWEMANE LTD.;REEL/FRAME:064501/0498 Effective date: 20230302 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BEIJING ZITIAO NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., CHINA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BEIJING PIANRUOJINGHONG TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.;REEL/FRAME:066565/0952 Effective date: 20231130 |