JPH09138701A - Operation control device for facility equipment - Google Patents
Operation control device for facility equipmentInfo
- Publication number
- JPH09138701A JPH09138701A JP29502995A JP29502995A JPH09138701A JP H09138701 A JPH09138701 A JP H09138701A JP 29502995 A JP29502995 A JP 29502995A JP 29502995 A JP29502995 A JP 29502995A JP H09138701 A JPH09138701 A JP H09138701A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- repair
- deterioration
- equipment
- items
- order
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 91
- 230000006866 deterioration Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 53
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 abstract description 7
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 abstract description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005856 abnormality Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005494 condensation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009833 condensation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008707 rearrangement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
- Alarm Systems (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は駅やビルなどの施設
の運用や保全の管理に係わり、とりわけ補修事項を劣化
状態に合わせて選択実施することができる施設機器の運
用管理装置に関する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to management of operation and maintenance of facilities such as stations and buildings, and more particularly to an operation management apparatus for facility equipment capable of selectively executing repair items according to the deterioration state.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】従来、駅やビル等の施設に設置される機
器については、その劣化が検知された都度、補修するか
定期的に補修するかが慣習に従って決められる場合が多
く、補修効率を高めることができなかった。その都度補
修すると運転効率低下は避けられるが、稼働率は下がっ
てしまう。定期的に補修すると使用状態の変動は全く考
慮されないので、補修が早すぎたり、手遅れになったり
する。2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, with respect to equipment installed in facilities such as stations and buildings, it is often customary to decide whether to repair or regularly repair equipment whenever deterioration is detected. I couldn't raise it. If it is repaired each time, a decrease in operating efficiency can be avoided, but the operating rate will decrease. Regular repairs do not take into account changes in usage conditions, so repairs may be too early or too late.
【0003】さらに、保全合理化により、保全員や保全
費が削減されている中で、その都度補修することは事実
上、不可能になりつつある。また、定期的補修を計画し
ても、補修の要がないようであれば、繰り延べしたいと
いう判断も出てくる。以上のことから、管理体制が混乱
すると、使いたいときに未補修のため使えなかったり、
不要不急の工事が行われる事態が発生することになる。Furthermore, while maintenance personnel have been reduced and maintenance costs have been reduced due to maintenance rationalization, it is virtually impossible to carry out repairs each time. In addition, even if a scheduled repair is planned, if there is no need for repair, it may be decided to defer it. From the above, if the management system is confused, it can not be used because it is not repaired when you want to use it,
Unnecessary and urgent construction work will occur.
【0004】[0004]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】上述のように、従来の
運用管理システムでは、現状の環境に適合できなくなっ
ており、入力の手間が多い割には、実効が上がらなくな
っている。これが障害となって、有効なライフサイクル
コスト管理の実現が困難となっている。そこで本発明の
目的は、劣化指標を規範とした補修順位にしたがって、
施設の運用管理を整然と実施に移される仕組みを提供す
ることにある。As described above, the conventional operation management system cannot be adapted to the current environment, and the input cannot be effectively achieved despite the large amount of input work. This becomes an obstacle, and it is difficult to realize effective life cycle cost management. Therefore, the purpose of the present invention is to provide a repair index based on the deterioration index,
It is to provide a mechanism for systematically moving the operation management of facilities.
【0005】[0005]
【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は以上の目的を達
成するために、請求項1対応の発明では、運用管理の必
要な機器を備えた施設の運用や保全管理において、前記
機器の劣化指標に基づく劣化状態を検知する劣化検知手
段と、前記機器の前記劣化状態とそれに対応する補修事
項とを記憶する劣化指標対補修事項の対応テーブルと、
この対応テーブルにより、前記機器の劣化状態に対応す
る補修事項を登録する補修登録部と、この登録された補
修事項を優先実施すべき順に設定する補修実施順位設定
部と、実施すべき前記補修事項を表示する表示部とを備
え、劣化指標の監視データから劣化状態を検知したと
き、補修登録順序に従って補修を進めるようにする。SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In order to achieve the above object, the present invention relates to the invention according to claim 1, wherein in the operation and maintenance management of a facility equipped with equipment required for operation management, deterioration of the equipment is caused. Deterioration detection means for detecting a deterioration state based on an index, a deterioration index-repair item correspondence table that stores the deterioration state of the device and a repair item corresponding thereto,
According to this correspondence table, a repair registration unit for registering repair items corresponding to the deterioration state of the equipment, a repair execution order setting unit for setting the registered repair items in order of priority, and the repair items to be carried out. When the deterioration state is detected from the deterioration index monitoring data, the repair is performed in accordance with the repair registration order.
【0006】請求項2の発明は、請求項1記載の施設機
器の運用管理装置において、前記劣化検出手段により検
知された機器の劣化状態の推移を分析し、優先実施すべ
き補修事項の順序の見直し及び登録された補修事項の解
除をする分析機能部を備え、劣化状態が大きくなりつつ
ある場合に優先実施順位を上げたり、補修の効果が現れ
た事項については登録を解除したりする。According to a second aspect of the present invention, in the facility equipment operation management apparatus according to the first aspect, the transition of the deterioration state of the equipment detected by the deterioration detection means is analyzed, and the order of repair items to be preferentially executed is determined. Equipped with an analysis function unit for reviewing and canceling registered repair items, the priority order will be raised when the deterioration state is increasing, and the registration will be canceled for items that have been repaired.
【0007】請求項3の発明は、請求項1記載の施設機
器の運用管理装置において、実施すべき補修事項のある
機器の劣化状態が所定時間後に回復したかどうかを評価
する補修評価手段を備え、必ず実施すべきことが実施さ
れたかどうか、またその結果は有効かつ妥当であったか
などの補修状態の総合評価を行う。According to a third aspect of the present invention, in the facility equipment operation management apparatus according to the first aspect, there is provided a repair evaluation means for evaluating whether or not the deteriorated state of the equipment having a repair item to be restored has recovered after a predetermined time. , Comprehensive evaluation of the repair status, such as whether or not what must be carried out and whether the result was valid and valid are to be carried out.
【0008】[0008]
【発明の実施の形態】以下、図面を参照して本発明の一
実施例について説明する。図1は本発明による施設機器
の運用管理システムの実施例を示す図である。図1に示
すように、駅やビルの施設1にはボイラ11、冷凍機1
2、水ポンプ13のような運用管理対象機器(施設機
器)からなっている。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS An embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an embodiment of an operation management system for facility equipment according to the present invention. As shown in FIG. 1, a boiler 11 and a refrigerator 1 are installed in a facility 1 of a station or a building.
2. It is composed of operation management target equipment (facility equipment) such as the water pump 13.
【0009】運用管理システム2は、劣化検出部3、補
修登録部4、劣化指標対補修事項のマトリックステーブ
ル5、補修実施順位設定部6および表示部7の基本構成
と、定量的判断を付加した場合の分析機能部8と、補修
効果を見るための待ち時間要素9および補修評価部10
とからなる。The operation management system 2 adds the basic configuration of the deterioration detection unit 3, the repair registration unit 4, the deterioration index vs. repair item matrix table 5, the repair execution order setting unit 6 and the display unit 7, and quantitative judgment. Case analysis function section 8, waiting time element 9 for observing repair effect, and repair evaluation section 10
Consists of
【0010】次にこのような構成からなる本実施例の作
用について説明する。まず各運用管理対象機器11,1
2,13の機器効率aを劣化検出部3へ入力する。ま
た、別の方法として、各機器の入力値と出力値を別々に
入力して、劣化検出部内で出力対入力の比をとって効率
に換算してもよい。Next, the operation of this embodiment having such a configuration will be described. First, each operation management target device 11, 1
The device efficiency a of 2 and 13 is input to the deterioration detection unit 3. As another method, the input value and the output value of each device may be input separately, and the ratio of the output to the input may be taken in the deterioration detecting unit to be converted into the efficiency.
【0011】機器効率aから劣化検知部3により劣化状
態bを検知したとき、補修登録部4により劣化指標対補
修事項のマトリックステーブル5を検索cして該当する
補修事項を登録dする。登録された補修事項eは補修実
施順位設定部6で、優先処理すべき順たとえば、効率低
下の大きい順に設定される。実施段階にきた補修事項f
は表示部7によって運転員に通報される。When the deterioration detecting unit 3 detects the deterioration state b from the equipment efficiency a, the repair registration unit 4 searches the deterioration index vs. repair item matrix table 5 to register the corresponding repair item d. The registered repair items e are set by the repair execution order setting unit 6 in the order in which priority processing should be performed, for example, in descending order of efficiency reduction. Repair items f at the implementation stage
Is notified to the operator by the display unit 7.
【0012】分析機能部8により、劣化検出部3で検知
された劣化状態bを分析して、補修処理の解除判定gや
優先処理順の組み替えhを行う分析機能が作用する。補
修評価部10により、補修実施順位設定部6で設定され
た補修が各施設において有効な補修効果をもたらしたか
どうかを待ち時間(指令iとjの差時間)を入れて評価
する補修評価が作用し、その結果kを表示する。The analysis function unit 8 analyzes the deterioration state b detected by the deterioration detection unit 3 and performs an analysis function of judging whether the repair process is canceled g or changing the priority process order h. The repair evaluation part 10 evaluates whether or not the repair set by the repair implementation order setting part 6 has brought about an effective repair effect in each facility by including a waiting time (difference time between the commands i and j). Then, the result k is displayed.
【0013】劣化指標対補修事項のマトリックステーブ
ル5による作用を、図2の対象機器がボイラである場合
のテーブルに基づいて説明する。図2において縦の欄は
劣化指標を効率低下にとって、10%未満と10%以上
に振り分け、後者の場合は、より本格的な補修を行う。
また横の欄は、補修事項を運用時期で3分割し、それぞ
れの時期で劣化の進展度に応じた補修事項を割り当てて
いる。このようにすることで、該当する補修事項を登録
することができる。The operation of the deterioration index vs. repair item matrix table 5 will be described based on the table shown in FIG. 2 when the target device is a boiler. In the vertical column in FIG. 2, the deterioration index is divided into less than 10% and 10% or more for efficiency reduction, and in the latter case, more serious repair is performed.
In the horizontal column, repair items are divided into three according to the operation period, and repair items are assigned according to the degree of progress of deterioration at each time. By doing so, the corresponding repair item can be registered.
【0014】定量的判断を付加した場合の分析機能部8
による作用を、図3の劣化指標推移図に基づいて説明す
る。図3において横軸tは時間、縦軸bは劣化状態であ
る。グラフp,qは、劣化判定しきい値rを過ぎる状態
を示している。グラフpは、補修により劣化状態から回
復したことに相当するので、この場合、分析機能部8
は、補修処理の解除判定指令gを補修登録部4に送り、
登録を解除する。グラフqは、劣化状態が急激に進んだ
ことに相当するので、この場合、分析機能部8は、優先
処理順の組み替え指令hを補修実施順位設定部6に送
り、優先順位を繰り上げる。Analysis function unit 8 when quantitative judgment is added
The effect of the above will be described based on the deterioration index transition diagram of FIG. In FIG. 3, the horizontal axis t is time, and the vertical axis b is the deteriorated state. The graphs p and q show the state where the deterioration determination threshold value r is exceeded. Since the graph p corresponds to the recovery from the deteriorated state due to the repair, in this case, the analysis function unit 8
Sends a repair determination cancellation command g to the repair registration unit 4,
Unregister. Since the graph q corresponds to the rapid progress of the deterioration state, in this case, the analysis function unit 8 sends the rearrangement command h of the priority processing order to the repair execution order setting unit 6 to raise the priority order.
【0015】こうして、劣化量、時間変化率ともに定量
的判断が可能になり、よりきめ細かい補修対応がとれる
ようになる。次に、補修効果の判断を付加した場合の補
修評価部10による作用を、図4の補修評価テーブルに
基づいて説明する。図4において、縦の欄は対象機器に
対する補修事項を示し、横の欄は、評価のランクを示し
ている。劣化指標は、機器効率に限らず、冷凍機であれ
ば、凝縮圧力、水ポンプであれば、吐出圧力でもよい。
待ち時間を経過して劣化状態が回復すれば、判定は良、
回復しなければ、猶予を与えて判定を保留とする。さら
に待ち時間の2倍を経過して劣化状態が回復すれば、判
定は可、回復しなければ、判定は不可とする。In this way, it becomes possible to quantitatively judge both the deterioration amount and the rate of change over time, and more detailed repair measures can be taken. Next, the operation of the repair evaluation unit 10 when the judgment of the repair effect is added will be described based on the repair evaluation table of FIG. In FIG. 4, vertical columns indicate repair items for the target device, and horizontal columns indicate evaluation ranks. The deterioration index is not limited to the device efficiency, and may be the condensation pressure for a refrigerator and the discharge pressure for a water pump.
If the deterioration state recovers after the waiting time, the judgment is good,
If it does not recover, it gives a grace and suspends the judgment. Further, if the deterioration state is recovered after the lapse of twice the waiting time, the determination is possible, and if not, the determination is not possible.
【0016】こうして、補修項目を表示した後、必ず実
施すべきことが実施されたかどうか、判定保留の状態の
後でも実施されたか、また、その結果は有効かつ妥当で
あったかなど、補修状態の総合評価ができる。In this way, after displaying the repair items, whether or not what must be carried out is carried out, whether it has been carried out even after the judgment pending state, and whether the result is valid and valid, etc. Can be evaluated.
【0017】[0017]
【発明の効果】以上説明したように、請求項1記載の発
明によれば、劣化指標の監視データから劣化状態を検知
したとき、補修登録順位に従って補修が進められること
によって、補修業務が円滑に行われ、補修コストの面で
も非常に有利になる。As described above, according to the first aspect of the present invention, when the deterioration state is detected from the deterioration index monitoring data, the repair work is carried out in accordance with the repair registration order, so that the repair work can be carried out smoothly. It will be carried out and it will be very advantageous in terms of repair cost.
【0018】請求項2記載の発明によれば、分析機能を
付けることで、定量的な判断が入ることになり、劣化判
定のしきい値を運用状態に応じて変えたり、劣化の変化
率から、通常の運用では見られない機器異常判定を加え
たりすることが可能になる。According to the second aspect of the present invention, by providing an analysis function, a quantitative judgment can be made, and the threshold value for deterioration judgment can be changed according to the operating condition, or the change rate of deterioration can be changed. , It becomes possible to add device abnormality judgment that is not seen in normal operation.
【0019】請求項3記載の発明によれば、補修評価を
付けることで、補修項目の内容の良否や補修時期の適正
度の判定が入れられ、システム機能のブラシアップや見
直しが可能になる。According to the third aspect of the invention, by attaching the repair evaluation, it is possible to judge the quality of the content of the repair item and the appropriateness of the repair time, and it is possible to brush up or review the system function.
【図1】本発明による施設機器の運用管理システムのブ
ロック構成図。FIG. 1 is a block configuration diagram of an operation management system for facility equipment according to the present invention.
【図2】本発明の劣化指標対補修事項のマトリックステ
ーブルの例。FIG. 2 is an example of a matrix table of deterioration index vs. repair items of the present invention.
【図3】劣化指標推移図の例。FIG. 3 is an example of a deterioration index transition diagram.
【図4】補修評価テーブルの例。FIG. 4 shows an example of a repair evaluation table.
1 駅やビルの施設 2 運用管理システム 3 劣化検出部 4 補修登録部 5 劣化指標対補修事項のマトリックステーブル 6 補修実施順位設定部 7 表示部 8 分析機能部 9 待ち時間要素 10 補修評価部 11 ボイラ 12 冷凍機 13 水ポンプ 1 Station or building facility 2 Operation management system 3 Deterioration detection unit 4 Repair registration unit 5 Degradation index vs. repair item matrix table 6 Repair implementation order setting unit 7 Display unit 8 Analysis function unit 9 Waiting time element 10 Repair evaluation unit 11 Boiler 12 Refrigerator 13 Water pump
Claims (3)
用や保全管理において、前記機器の劣化指標に基づく劣
化状態を検知する劣化検知手段と、前記機器の前記劣化
状態とそれに対応する補修事項とを記憶する劣化指標対
補修事項の対応テーブルと、この対応テーブルにより、
前記機器の劣化状態に対応する補修事項を登録する補修
登録部と、この登録された補修事項を優先実施すべき順
に設定する補修実施順位設定部と、実施すべき前記補修
事項を表示する表示部とを備えたことを特徴とする施設
機器の運用管理装置。1. In operation and maintenance management of a facility equipped with equipment that requires operation management, deterioration detecting means for detecting a deterioration state based on a deterioration index of the equipment, and the deterioration state of the equipment and repair corresponding thereto. By the correspondence table of the deterioration index and the repaired item that stores the items and the correspondence table,
A repair registration unit that registers repair items corresponding to the deterioration state of the device, a repair execution order setting unit that sets the registered repair items in the order in which they should be prioritized, and a display unit that displays the repair items to be executed. An operation management apparatus for facility equipment, comprising:
において、前記劣化検出手段により検知された機器の劣
化状態の推移を分析し、優先実施すべき補修事項の順序
の見直し及び登録された補修事項の解除をする分析機能
部を備えたことを特徴とする施設機器の運用管理装置。2. The facility equipment operation management apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the transition of the deterioration state of the equipment detected by the deterioration detecting means is analyzed, and the order of repair items to be prioritized is reviewed and registered. An operation management device for facility equipment, comprising an analysis function unit for canceling repair items.
において、実施すべき補修事項のある機器の劣化状態が
所定時間後に回復したかどうかを評価する補修評価手段
を備えたことを特徴とする施設機器の運用管理装置。3. The facility equipment operation management apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising repair evaluation means for evaluating whether or not the deteriorated state of the equipment having repair items to be restored has recovered after a predetermined time. A facility equipment operation management device.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP29502995A JPH09138701A (en) | 1995-11-14 | 1995-11-14 | Operation control device for facility equipment |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP29502995A JPH09138701A (en) | 1995-11-14 | 1995-11-14 | Operation control device for facility equipment |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JPH09138701A true JPH09138701A (en) | 1997-05-27 |
Family
ID=17815407
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP29502995A Pending JPH09138701A (en) | 1995-11-14 | 1995-11-14 | Operation control device for facility equipment |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JPH09138701A (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2004526243A (en) * | 2001-03-01 | 2004-08-26 | フィッシャー−ローズマウント システムズ, インコーポレイテッド | Creating and displaying indicators in a process plant |
JP2006309279A (en) * | 2005-04-26 | 2006-11-09 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Facility state monitor control system |
CN111126744A (en) * | 2019-10-22 | 2020-05-08 | 陕西省地方电力(集团)有限公司 | Power grid transformation equipment maintenance management method and system |
-
1995
- 1995-11-14 JP JP29502995A patent/JPH09138701A/en active Pending
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2004526243A (en) * | 2001-03-01 | 2004-08-26 | フィッシャー−ローズマウント システムズ, インコーポレイテッド | Creating and displaying indicators in a process plant |
JP2006309279A (en) * | 2005-04-26 | 2006-11-09 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Facility state monitor control system |
CN111126744A (en) * | 2019-10-22 | 2020-05-08 | 陕西省地方电力(集团)有限公司 | Power grid transformation equipment maintenance management method and system |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN101981522B (en) | Graphical user interface apparatus | |
CN102009885B (en) | Elevator maintenance management system | |
US20030057029A1 (en) | Managing method and system for building equipment and elevator | |
US20120116827A1 (en) | Plant analyzing system | |
WO2020189374A1 (en) | Maintenance work assistance device, maintenance work assistance method, and maintenance work assistance program | |
JP3054039B2 (en) | Plant maintenance support equipment | |
JPH09138701A (en) | Operation control device for facility equipment | |
CN117313019A (en) | Data anomaly detection method based on deep reinforcement learning | |
JP2764586B2 (en) | Machine abnormality recovery method display device | |
JPH08129691A (en) | Fault diagnostic device utilizing expert system | |
CN116911807A (en) | Intelligent gas data center flow visual management method and Internet of things system | |
JPH0784636A (en) | Method and device for collecting/monitoring process data | |
KR102162427B1 (en) | Method for monitering abnormality judgment of machine tool | |
JP2002133026A (en) | Work support system, operation support system and recording medium | |
JPH09231491A (en) | Building managing equipment | |
KR20200072069A (en) | Robot state information providing system based on motor information | |
US20080167745A1 (en) | Method And Device For The Diagnosis Of Technical Devices Disposed Within An Industrial Installation | |
KR101069653B1 (en) | Precaution maintenance system and method for automation equipment | |
JP2009169645A (en) | Monitoring control device | |
JP2001141762A (en) | Analytic method of used energy quantity and energy management support device | |
JPH07129232A (en) | Plant monitor device | |
CN118981649A (en) | Labor and labor risk early warning method and system based on multi-source data | |
JP2002193408A (en) | Physical distribution automating system | |
JPH0390988A (en) | Method and device for controlling service life of plant apparatus | |
JPH02270063A (en) | Advice device for evaluation of equipment |