Hand-writing in itself is not sufficient to prove guilt in court as it can be forged.
The laptop is in custody, everyone knows it is. The man who had it said he was legally blind and yet, he somehow reviewed the material? Hmm. Sus. With all of that, let's assume that there's stuff on the laptop - Burisma simply could not have happened. The time it was alleged to have happen does not coincide with when Hunter worked there.
I mean, I'll be glad to hear the case when it comes up. Cause, you know, I'm not a loyalist.