IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/jhimwp/125733.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gemeinschaftliche Absatz- und Exportförderung für Agrarerzeugnisse und Lebensmittel in Österreich und den USA

Author

Listed:
  • Peter, Guenter

Abstract

Zusammenfassung : Der vorliegende Bericht stellt die wesentlichen Elemente der Absatzförderung Österreichs und der USA dar. Absatzförderung in Österreich ist produktübergreifend, in den USA überwiegend branchenspezifisch organisiert. In beiden Ländern liegt der Schwerpunkt der Maßnahmen auf generischer Werbung. Der Ausgabenanteil für Forschung im Rahmen der Absatzförderung liegt in den USA um den Faktor 2,5 höher als in Österreich. Das erklärte Ziel beider Regierungen ist es, die Exportquote der Ernährungswirtschaft in den nächsten Jahren zu erhöhen. Neben einem Literaturüberblick zur Wirksamkeit generischer Werbung werden ordnungspolitische Leitlinien für staatliche Eingriffe bei der Außenwirtschaftsförderung vorgestellt. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary: This study presents key elements of promotion programmes for food and agricultural products in Austria and the USA. The promotion programme in Austria encompasses a variety of different food and agricultural products while the US programmes are mostly branch-specific. Programmes in both countries focus on generic advertising. The share of measures for research and development in the USA is 2.5 times higher than in Austria. Both governments aim to increase food and agriculture related exports during the upcoming years. Beside a short literature review regarding the effectiveness of generic advertising, a regulative guideline for export promotion programmes is presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter, Guenter, 2011. "Gemeinschaftliche Absatz- und Exportförderung für Agrarerzeugnisse und Lebensmittel in Österreich und den USA," Thünen Working Paper 125733, Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (vTI), Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jhimwp:125733
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.125733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/125733/files/peter04_2011.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.125733?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wohlgenant, Michael K., 2006. "Retail-to-Farm Transmission of Generic Advertising Effects," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 21(2), pages 1-6.
    2. Strecker, Otto, 1971. "Gemeinschaftsmarketing für Nahrungsmittel. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Arbeit von Absatzfonds und CMA," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 20(09).
    3. R. W. Ward & C. Lambert, 1993. "Generic Promotion Of Beef: Measuring The Impact Of The Us Beef Checkoff," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(3), pages 456-465, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter, Günter, 2011. "Gemeinschaftliche Absatz- und Exportförderung für Agrarerzeugnisse und Lebensmittel in Österreich und den USA. Bericht im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbrauchersc," Arbeitsberichte aus der vTI-Agrarökonomie 04/2011, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    2. Capacci, Sara & Mazzocchi, Mario, 2011. "Five-a-day, a price to pay: An evaluation of the UK program impact accounting for market forces," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 87-98, January.
    3. Capps, Oral, Jr. & Williams, Gary W. & Dang, Trang, 2010. "Effects of Lamb Promotion on Lamb Demand and Imports," Reports 90492, Texas A&M University, Agribusiness, Food, and Consumer Economics Research Center.
    4. Yeboah, Godfred & Maynard, Leigh J., 2004. "The Impact Of Bse, Fmd, And U.S. Export Promotion Expenditures On Japanese Meat Demand," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19978, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Capps, Oral & Seo, Seong-Cheon & Nichols, John P., 1997. "On the Estimation of Advertising Effects for Branded Products: An Application to Spaghetti Sauces," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(2), pages 291-302, December.
    6. Glauber, Joseph W. & Effland, Anne, 2016. "United States agricultural policy: Its evolution and impact:," IFPRI discussion papers 1543, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Yadavalli, Anita & Jones, Keithly, 2014. "Does media influence consumer demand? The case of lean finely textured beef in the United States," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P1), pages 219-227.
    8. Kinnucan, Henry W., 2003. "Optimal generic advertising in an imperfectly competitive food industry with variable proportions," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 143-158, October.
    9. Freebairn, John W. & Goddard, Ellen W. & Griffith, Garry R., 2005. "When Can a Generic Advertising Program Increase Farmer Returns?," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 13.
    10. Cattaneo, Andrea & Federighi, Giovanni & Vaz, Sara, 2021. "The environmental impact of reducing food loss and waste: A critical assessment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    11. J. A. L. Cranfield, 2003. "Optimal Collective Investment in Generic Advertising, Export Market Promotion and Cost-of-Production-Reducing Research," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 51(3), pages 299-321, November.
    12. Ferrier, Peyton & Lamb, Russell, 2007. "Government regulation and quality in the US beef market," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 84-97, February.
    13. H. W. Kinnucan, 1996. "A Note On Measuring Returns To Generic Advertising In Interrelated Markets," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1‐4), pages 261-267, January.
    14. Meza, Liliana & Sanjuan, Ana I. & Mascaray, Maria A. & Albisu, Luis M., 1999. "An integrated approach to evaluate generic promotions," 67th Seminar, October 28-30, 1999, LeMans, France 241042, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Lee L. Schulz & John M. Crespi, 2012. "Presence of Check‐Off Programs and Industry Concentration in the Food Manufacturing Sector," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 148-156, March.
    16. Marco A. Palma & Myriah D. Johnson & David P. Anderson, 2019. "The effects of experience versus description of attributes on willingness‐to‐pay for beefsteaks," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 50(2), pages 129-137, March.
    17. Yuqing Zheng & Harry M. Kaiser, 2009. "Evaluating the effectiveness of generic advertising versus nonadvertising marketing activities on New York State milk markets," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(3), pages 351-368.
    18. Verbeke, Wim & Ward, Ronald W., 2001. "A fresh meat almost ideal demand system incorporating negative TV press and advertising impact," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 25(2-3), pages 359-374, September.
    19. Zhang, Mingxia & Sexton, Richard J., 2000. "Optimal Commodity Promotion In Imperfectly Competitive Markets," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21823, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Chung, Chanjin & Henneberry, Shida Rastegari & Tostao, Emilio, 2004. "Will The Voluntary Checkoff Program Be The Answer? An Analysis Of Optimal Advertising And Free-Rider Problem In The U.S. Beef Industry," 2004 Annual Meeting, February 14-18, 2004, Tulsa, Oklahoma 34694, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jhimwp:125733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imagvde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.