IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cjz/noesis/652.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vulnerabilidad laboral de la mujer rural latinoamericana

Author

Listed:
  • Jaime de Pablo Valenciano

    (Universidad de Almeria)

  • Mercedes Capobianco Urdiales

    (Universidad de Almeria)

  • Juan Uribe Toril

    (Universidad de Almeria)

Abstract

Este artículo aborda el estudio de la situación laboral de las mujeres rurales en los países latinoamericanos. Las mujeres rurales son uno de los grupos sociales más vulnerables en el ámbito laboral latinoamericano, debido a su baja participación laboral, a la categorización ocupacional mayoritaria como trabajadoras por cuenta propia y familiar no remunerado y a índices de feminización positivos. Pero sus posibilidades de mejorar su condición de vulnerabilidad social laboral se centra principalmente en el Empleo Rural No Agrario (ERNA), con gran potencial en el desarrollo rural, y al apoyo legislativo en cuanto al acceso a los bienes de tierra. Frente al proceso de urbanización es necesario implementar políticas públicas que tengan en cuenta la existencia de las mujeres rurales como trabajadoras en el ámbito rural y diseñar medidas de ayuda especialmente dirigidas a este colectivo.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaime de Pablo Valenciano & Mercedes Capobianco Urdiales & Juan Uribe Toril, 2017. "Vulnerabilidad laboral de la mujer rural latinoamericana," Nóesis. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Nóesis. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, vol. 26, pages 130-151, 52.
    • Handle: RePEc:cjz:noesis:652
    Note: none
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://open-apps.uacj.mx/RePEc/cjz/noesis/652.pdf
    File Function: none
    Download Restriction: none
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberto Pizarro, 2001. "La vulnerabilidad social y sus desafíos: una mirada desde América Latina," Documentos de Investigación 3101, Cepal Naciones Unidas.
    2. Parada, Soledad & Ballara, Marcela, 2009. "El empleo de las mujeres rurales: lo que dicen las cifras," Coediciones, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 1346 edited by Fao.
    3. Dirven, Martine, 2004. "El empleo rural no agrícola y la diversidad rural en América Latina," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), August.
    4. Dirven, Martine & Köbrich, Claus, 2007. "Características del empleo rural no agrícola en América Latina con énfasis en los servicios," Desarrollo Productivo 4568, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    5. Candia Baeza, David & Dirven, Martine & Echeverri, Rafael & Faiguenbaum, Sergio & Peña, Carolina & Rodríguez, Adrián G. & Sabalain, Cristina, 2011. "Hacia una nueva definición de "rural" con fines estadísticos en América Latina," Documentos de Proyectos 3858, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    6. Rodríguez Vignoli, Jorge, 2001. "Vulnerabilidad y grupos vulnerables: un marco de referencia conceptual mirando a los jóvenes," Población y Desarrollo 7150, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    7. Deere, Carmen Diana & Leon, Magdalena, 2003. "The Gender Asset Gap: Land in Latin America," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 925-947, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felipe Contreras Molotla, 2013. "Cambios ocupacionales en los contextos rurales de México," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, June.
    2. Thomas Vendryes, 2014. "Peasants Against Private Property Rights: A Review Of The Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 971-995, December.
    3. My Nguyen & Kien Le, 2023. "The impacts of women's land ownership: Evidence from Vietnam," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 158-177, February.
    4. Ali, Daniel Ayalew & Deininger, Klaus & Goldstein, Markus, 2014. "Environmental and gender impacts of land tenure regularization in Africa: Pilot evidence from Rwanda," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 262-275.
    5. Andre Croppenstedt & Markus Goldstein & Nina Rosas, 2013. "Gender and Agriculture: Inefficiencies, Segregation, and Low Productivity Traps," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 28(1), pages 79-109, February.
    6. Carmen Diana Deere & Rosa Luz Durán & Merrilee Mardon & Tom Masterson, 2004. "Female Land Rights and Rural Household Incomes in Brazil, Paraguay and Peru," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2004-08, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    7. Allendorf, Keera, 2007. "Do Women's Land Rights Promote Empowerment and Child Health in Nepal?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 1975-1988, November.
    8. Eastin, Joshua, 2018. "Climate change and gender equality in developing states," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 289-305.
    9. Mårtensson, K., 2012. "Urban dimensions within rural territories: gender dynamics in the labor market in O’Higgins, Chile," Working papers 106, Rimisp Latin American Center for Rural Development.
    10. Meinzen-Dick, Ruth & Quisumbing, Agnes & Doss, Cheryl & Theis, Sophie, 2019. "Women's land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: Framework and review of available evidence," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 72-82.
    11. -, 2009. "The outlook for agriculture and rural development in the Americas: a perspective on Latin America and the Caribbean, 2009," Coediciones, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 1379 edited by Iica.
    12. Janvier Mwisha-Kasiwa & Cédrick Kalemasi-Mosengo & Oasis Kodila-Tedika, 2023. "Understanding the link between gendered access to agricultural land and household nutrition outcomes in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)," Working Papers of the African Governance and Development Institute. 23/075, African Governance and Development Institute..
    13. Savath, Vivien & Fletschner, Diana & Peterman, Amber & Santos, Florence, 2014. "Land, assets, and livelihoods: Gendered analysis of evidence from Odisha State in India:," IFPRI discussion papers 1323, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Mérida-Martínez, Y & Acuña-Gamboa, L. A, 2015. "Pobreza en México: Factor de vulnerabilidad para enfrentar los efectos del cambio climático," Revista Iberoamericana de Bioeconomía y Cambio Climàtico, National Autonomous University of Nicaragua, Leon, vol. 1(2), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Alexander M. Danzer & Lennard Zyska, 2023. "Pensions and Fertility: Microeconomic Evidence," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 126-165, May.
    16. Lambrecht, Isabel Brigitte & Synt, Nang Lun Kham & Win, Hnin Ei & Mahrt, Kristi & Win, Khin Zin, 2024. "“It doesn’t matter at all—we are family”: Titling and joint property rights in Myanmar," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    17. Alexis Saludjian, 2005. "Le modèle de la croissance excluante et l'insécurité économique dans le Mercosur depuis 1990," Revue Tiers-Monde, Armand Colin, vol. 0(4), pages 883-905.
    18. Daphna Hacker, 2010. "The Gendered Dimensions of Inheritance: Empirical Food for Legal Thought," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 322-354, June.
    19. Valentina Hartarska & Denis Nadolnyak & Roy Mersland, 2014. "Are Women Better Bankers to the Poor? Evidence from Rural Microfinance Institutions," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1291-1306.
    20. Anglade, Boaz & Useche, Pilar & Deere, Carmen Diana, 2017. "Decomposing the Gender Wealth Gap in Ecuador," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 19-31.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pobreza; empoderamiento; propiedad de la tierra; políticas públicas;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cjz:noesis:652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ph.D. Isaac Leobardo Sánchez Juárez (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dsacjmx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.