IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/sojoae/29468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply Relationships In The South - What Have We Learned?

Author

Listed:
  • Shumway, C. Richard

Abstract

Accurate estimation of the responsiveness of agricultural commodity supplies is vitally important. Government policy negotiations rely on supply estimates in predicting both commodity and intercommodity effects of changing programs and in anticipating their consequent social benefits and costs. Individual farmers and agribusiness firms need them and associated price predictions in making investment and production decisions.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Shumway, C. Richard, 1986. "Supply Relationships In The South - What Have We Learned?," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(1), pages 1-9, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:sojoae:29468
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.29468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/29468/files/18010011.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.29468?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wall, G. Bryan & Tilley, Daniel S., 1979. "Production Responses And Price Determination In The Florida Watermelon Industry," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 11(1), pages 1-4, July.
    2. Marc Nerlove & William Addison, 1958. "Statistical Estimation of Long-Run Elasticities of Supply and Demand," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 40(4), pages 861-880.
    3. Hammig, Michael D., 1979. "Regional Acreage Response by Quarter for Fresh Tomatoes: An Example of the Use of Mixed Estimation," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 69-74, December.
    4. J. Scott Shonkwiler & Robert D. Emerson, 1982. "Imports and the Supply of Winter Tomatoes: An Application of Rational Expectations," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 64(4), pages 634-641.
    5. Philip Garcia & Steven T. Sonka & Man Sik Yoo, 1982. "Farm Size, Tenure, and Economic Efficiency in a Sample of Illinois Grain Farms," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 64(1), pages 119-123.
    6. Shonkwiler, J. Scott & Pagoulatos, Emilio, 1980. "A Model of Weekly Price Discovery for Florida Celery: Reply," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 163-164, December.
    7. Penn, J. B. & Irwin, George D., 1971. "A Simultaneous Equation Approach to Production Response: Delta Region," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(1), pages 115-121, December.
    8. Angirasa, Aditi K. & Shumway, C. Richard & Nelsen, T. C. & Cartwright, T. C., 1981. "Integration, Risk, and Supply Response: A Simulation and Linear Programming Analysis of An East Texas Cow-Calf Producer," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 89-98, July.
    9. Shonkwiler, John Scott & Pagoulatos, Emilio, 1980. "A Model Of Weekly Price Discovery For Florida Celery," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 12(1), pages 1-6, July.
    10. Nix, James E. & Martin, Neil R., Jr. & Hubbard, John W., 1975. "An Enterprise Competition Analysis Of Beef Production In The South," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 7(2), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Michael R. Reed & Steven K. Riggins, 1981. "A Disaggregated Analysis of Corn Acreage Response in Kentucky," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(4), pages 708-711.
    12. Wall, G. Bryan & Tilley, Daniel S., 1979. "Production Responses and Price Determination in the Florida Watermelon Industry," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 153-156, July.
    13. Hammig, Michael D., 1979. "Regional Acreage Response By Quarter For Fresh Tomatoes: An Example Of The Use Of Mixed Estimation," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 11(2), pages 1-6, December.
    14. Askari, Hossein & Cummings, John Thomas, 1977. "Estimating Agricultural Supply Response with the Nerlove Model: A Survey," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 18(2), pages 257-292, June.
    15. Harlow W. Halvorson, 1955. "The Supply Elasticity for Milk in the Short Run," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 37(5), pages 1186-1197.
    16. B. J. Morzuch & R. D. Weaver & P. G. Helmberger, 1980. "Wheat Acreage Supply Response under Changing Farm Programs," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(1), pages 29-37.
    17. Anonymous, 1985. "Forthcoming in December," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 79(3), pages 830-830, September.
    18. Penn, J.B. & Irwin, George D., 1971. "A Simultaneous Equation Approach To Production Response: Delta Region," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 3(1), pages 1-7, December.
    19. Nix, James E. & Martin, Neil R. & Hubbard, John W., 1975. "An Enterprise Competition Analysis of Beef Production in the South," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 95-104, December.
    20. Shumway, C. Richard & Powell, Alan A., 1984. "A Critique Of The Constant Elasticity Of Transformation (Cet) Linear Supply System," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 9(2), pages 1-8, December.
    21. C. Richard Shumway, 1983. "Supply, Demand, and Technology in a Multiproduct Industry: Texas Field Crops," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(4), pages 748-760.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Levins, Richard A. & Lopez, Ramon E., 1988. "Agricultural Supply Response and Industry Structure," Working Papers 197603, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    2. Shideed, Kamil H. & White, Fred C. & Brannen, Stephen J., 1987. "The Responsiveness Of U.S. Corn And Soybean Acreages To Conditional Price Expectations: An Application To The 1985 Farm Bill," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(2), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Affuso, Ermanno & Hite, Diane, 2013. "A model for sustainable land use in biofuel production: An application to the state of Alabama," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 29-39.
    4. White, Fred C., 1987. "Distribution of Agricultural Research Impacts," Evaluating Agricultural Research and Productivity, Proceedings of a Workshop, Atlanta, Georgia, January 29-30, 1987, Miscellaneous Publication 52 50023, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fullerton, Thomas M., Jr., 1984. "Supply elasticities for U.S. fresh market vegetables: an application of duality theory within a quasi-rational expectations framework," ISU General Staff Papers 1984010108000017526, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Langley, James A., 1983. "Regional acreage response functions for major US field crops: estimation and policy implications," ISU General Staff Papers 198301010800008678, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Thompson, C. Stassen, 1986. "Discussion: Supply Relationships In The South - What Have We Learned?," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(1), pages 1-3, July.
    4. Ahouissoussi, Nicolas B.C. & McIntosh, Christopher S. & Wetzstein, Michael E., 1995. "Rational Expectations Estimation Of Georgia Soybean Acreage Response," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Shengying Zhai & Qihui Chen & Wenxin Wang, 2019. "What Drives Green Fodder Supply in China?—A Nerlovian Analysis with LASSO Variable Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Duffy, Patricia A. & Richardson, James W. & Wohlgenant, Michael K., 1987. "Regional Cotton Acreage Response," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(1), pages 99-110, July.
    7. Just, Richard E., 1993. "Discovering Production and Supply Relationships: Present Status and Future Opportunities," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(01), pages 1-30, April.
    8. Hammig, Michael D. & Mittelhammer, Ronald C., 1980. "An Imperfectly Competitive Market Model Of The U.S. Lettuce Industry," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, July.
    9. Aradhyula, Satheesh Venkata, 1989. "Policy structure, output supply and input demand for US crops," ISU General Staff Papers 198901010800009909, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    10. Burton, Diana M. & Love, H. Alan, 1996. "A Review of Alternative Expectations Regimes in Commodity Markets: Specification, Estimation, and Hypothesis Testing Using Structural Models," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 213-231, October.
    11. Mittlehammer, Ron C., 1983. "Mixed Estimation: A New Perspective," 1983 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 3, West Lafayette, Indiana 279112, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Shumway, C. Richard & Davis, George C., 2001. "Does consistent aggregation really matter?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(2), pages 1-34.
    13. Torok, Steven John, 1982. "International trade in commodities and labor: the case of the importation of Mexican agricultural labor and fresh market winter tomatoes into the US, 1964-1979," ISU General Staff Papers 198201010800008550, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    14. Just, Richard E., 1992. "Discovering Microeconomic Relationships in Agriculture," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 146530, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    15. Rickard, Bradley J. & Gonsalves, Jana L., 2008. "How would compliance with dietary recommendations affect revenues for agricultural producers?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 422-433, October.
    16. Skold, Karl Durwood, 1989. "The integration of alternative information systems: an application to the Hogs and Pigs report," ISU General Staff Papers 1989010108000010239, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    17. Updaw, Nelson J., 1980. "A Model Of Weekly Price Discovery For Florida Celery: Comment," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 12(2), pages 1-2, December.
    18. Diebold, Francis X. & Lamb, Russell L., 1997. "Why are estimates of agricultural supply response so variable?," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1-2), pages 357-373.
    19. Rickard, Bradley J. & Lei, Lei, 2010. "How important are sanitary and phytosanitary barriers in international markets for fresh fruit?," Working Papers 126974, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    20. Musser, Wesley N., 1979. "Discussion: Non-Point Source Pollution Abatement—Potential Impact and Research Needs," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 11-15, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Industrial Organization;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sojoae:29468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.