Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug: geonode container not responding #96

Open
mwallschlaeger opened this issue Sep 18, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Bug: geonode container not responding #96

mwallschlaeger opened this issue Sep 18, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@mwallschlaeger
Copy link
Contributor

Bug Description

When running geonode-k8s on a cluster for some days. I noticed that the container isn't responding to web traffic anymore. The logs just reinitializing workers all the time:

worker 10 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
Respawned uWSGI worker 10 (new pid: 1324)
Respawned uWSGI worker 9 (new pid: 1325)
worker 10 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
worker 9 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
Respawned uWSGI worker 10 (new pid: 1331)
Respawned uWSGI worker 9 (new pid: 1332)
worker 9 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
worker 10 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
Respawned uWSGI worker 10 (new pid: 1347)
Respawned uWSGI worker 9 (new pid: 1348)
worker 9 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
worker 10 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
Respawned uWSGI worker 10 (new pid: 1354)
Respawned uWSGI worker 9 (new pid: 1355)
worker 9 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
worker 10 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
Respawned uWSGI worker 10 (new pid: 1361)
Respawned uWSGI worker 9 (new pid: 1362)
worker 9 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
worker 10 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
Respawned uWSGI worker 10 (new pid: 1400)
Respawned uWSGI worker 9 (new pid: 1401)
worker 10 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
Respawned uWSGI worker 10 (new pid: 1413)
worker 9 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
Respawned uWSGI worker 9 (new pid: 1415)
worker 10 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
Respawned uWSGI worker 10 (new pid: 1420)
worker 9 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
Respawned uWSGI worker 9 (new pid: 1422)
worker 10 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
worker 9 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
Respawned uWSGI worker 10 (new pid: 1428)
Respawned uWSGI worker 9 (new pid: 1429)
worker 10 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
worker 9 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
Respawned uWSGI worker 10 (new pid: 1435)
Respawned uWSGI worker 9 (new pid: 1436)
worker 9 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
worker 10 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
Respawned uWSGI worker 10 (new pid: 1442)
Respawned uWSGI worker 9 (new pid: 1443)
worker 9 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)
worker 10 lifetime reached, it was running for 3601 second(s)

Maye it's useful here to increase the .Values.geonode.uswgi.max_worker_lifetime default to something higher that 3600 seconds. Also it would be good to have Liveness probes for all the geonode service.

Reproduction Steps

best to provide your values.yaml, a brief description of your cluster and version of geonode-k8s here.

Behavior

A description of what you expected to happen and what actually happened.

Additional Information

Any additional information or context that may be helpful in resolving the bug.

@mwallschlaeger mwallschlaeger added bug Something isn't working 1.1.0 labels Sep 18, 2023
@mwallschlaeger mwallschlaeger added this to the release 1.1.0 milestone Sep 18, 2023
@mwallschlaeger mwallschlaeger self-assigned this Sep 18, 2023
@mwallschlaeger
Copy link
Contributor Author

I cannot reproduce this issue atm. Therefore I will remove this issue from release 1.1.0

@mwallschlaeger mwallschlaeger removed this from the release 1.1.0 milestone Mar 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant