Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LEFT Running Only Returns QED Part? #107

Open
deadlinerJ opened this issue Nov 1, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

LEFT Running Only Returns QED Part? #107

deadlinerJ opened this issue Nov 1, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@deadlinerJ
Copy link

deadlinerJ commented Nov 1, 2022

Hi,

I am using the LEFT running from Mz to b quark mass. The code is done in "flavio" basis. To simplify the issue I encountered, a simplified code is shown below.

Screen Shot 2022-11-01 at 5 04 12 PM

Only CSR_bctaunutau and CS_bstautau are turned on. The change of the 2 should be comparable. My question is why the change of CS_bstautau is so small and it seems only QED part is considered.

Here is my check of the Mathematica code attached to:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1704.06639.pdf

For CS_bstautau, it returns:
Screen Shot 2022-11-01 at 5 17 07 PM

I feel confused with this. Do I miss anything?

Thanks.

@DavidMStraub
Copy link
Member

If you look at the basis, you'll notice that the scalar operator in the charged current case is defined without a mass factor, while the neutral current one has a mass factor included. Consequently, the QCD part of the b->s operator is a conserved current and you're seeing only QED running. For the b->c operator, the Wilson coefficient renormalizes under QCD like the mass.

@peterstangl peterstangl added the question Further information is requested label Nov 1, 2022
@deadlinerJ
Copy link
Author

Exactly. The neutral scalar operator in 1704 doesn't have such a mass factor but the one in flavio basis does. Thank you very much!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants