Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changes to names for hard and soft flats in 'Medieval and Renaissance accidentals' range #263

Open
dspreadbury opened this issue Oct 25, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@dspreadbury
Copy link
Contributor

Says Freeman Gilmore:

I have a question about, U+E9E1 it is called a 'Flat,hard B (mi)' At one time only one flat note, it was a Bb.

The gamut was:

[Gamma uppercase] A B C D E F G a b [square b] c d e f g aa bb [square bb] cc.dd ee.

b was Bb, called soft B, and also fa, (U+E9E0)  And it was also sometimes used as an accidental on the staft to make it clear that the B note was Bb.    (the written note B in German.)

Square b was B, called hard B, and also fa, (U+E9Ei)  And it was also sometimes used as an accidental on the staft to make it clear that the B note was B.   Should be called 'Hard B (mi)', is  not a Flat hard B (mi),   (the written note H in German, because they thought the square B looked like the lowercase gothic H).

@dspreadbury
Copy link
Contributor Author

What do you make of this, @mscuthbert? Do you agree we should change the glyph descriptions of these glyphs to be "Hard B" and "Soft B" rather than specifically including "flat" in their names?

@mscuthbert
Copy link

That's probably correct. Maybe they should be "Hard (Square) B" and "Soft (Flat) B"?

I wouldn't include the "mi" and "fa" designations even though they're correct, they'll just confuse people further.

@dspreadbury dspreadbury self-assigned this Nov 5, 2023
@dspreadbury dspreadbury added this to the SMuFL 1.5 milestone Nov 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants