Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What happened with COCO annotations? #133

Closed
hdnh2006 opened this issue Jul 27, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

What happened with COCO annotations? #133

hdnh2006 opened this issue Jul 27, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@hdnh2006
Copy link
Contributor

I started to use again this repo.

I remember at the beginning the outputs provided where in COCO format, am I wrong? 🤔🤔

Can you let me know how to read COCO annotations? I don't want to label in labelme format because I already have my annotations in COCO format. I loved that feature from this repo 😢😢

I don't know if I am wrong, please explain. Thank you.

@vietanhdev
Copy link
Owner

@hdnh2006 This tool didn't use COCO format from the beginning. You can try this tool to convert the data: https://github.com/fcakyon/labelme2coco.
I will add the support to convert between formats in this repo.

@ryouchinsa
Copy link

Thanks for your great tool AnyLabeling.

RectLabel is an offline image annotation tool for object detection and segmentation.
Although this is not an open source program, you can label polygons using Segment Anything models and import/export the COCO format.

sam_polygon

@hdnh2006
Copy link
Contributor Author

hdnh2006 commented Sep 4, 2023

@hdnh2006 This tool didn't use COCO format from the beginning. You can try this tool to convert the data: https://github.com/fcakyon/labelme2coco. I will add the support to convert between formats in this repo.

So, I was confused. Thanks.

@hdnh2006 hdnh2006 closed this as completed Sep 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants