Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vernemq-1.13.0.bullseye.arm64.tar.gz support Ubuntu aarch64? #2279

Closed
1 task done
805728578 opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 7 comments
Closed
1 task done

vernemq-1.13.0.bullseye.arm64.tar.gz support Ubuntu aarch64? #2279

805728578 opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@805728578
Copy link

Describe your issue or feature request

vernemq-1.13.0.bullseye.arm64.tar.gz support Ubuntu aarch64?

Describe the solution you'd like

it support Ubuntu aarch64

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Environment

  • VerneMQ Version:
  • OS:
  • Erlang/OTP version (if building from source):
  • Cluster size/standalone:

Add any other context, code samples or screenshots about the issue report here.

VerneMQ Version:1.13.0
OS: Ubuntu 20.04 aarch64
Cluster size: 3 nodes

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow the VerneMQ's Code of Conduct
@ioolkos
Copy link
Contributor

ioolkos commented Apr 23, 2024

@805728578 Thank you for expressing an interest in ARM64 Ubuntu packages. For 1.13 we have ARM support in the Docker image. If the need for users is there, we'll certainly build ARM .deb and rpm``s as well in the future. I'll see what to do about 1.13`, maybe the Docker image can help in the meantime.


👉 Thank you for supporting VerneMQ: https://github.com/sponsors/vernemq
👉 Using the binary VerneMQ packages commercially (.deb/.rpm/Docker) requires a paid subscription.

@JoeBlackZ
Copy link

Hopefully an Ubuntu focal arm version or a generic Linux version will be available. @ioolkos

@805728578
Copy link
Author

805728578 commented Apr 25, 2024

@ioolkos When is the plan to build ARM .deb?

@ioolkos
Copy link
Contributor

ioolkos commented May 2, 2024

@JoeBlackZ yes, a Focal ARM version will be included
@805728578 builder scripts/infra are adapted... will upload as the binaries come in. (it takes forever... our ARM infra is on the slower side, but all should be up in the coming days)


👉 Thank you for supporting VerneMQ: https://github.com/sponsors/vernemq
👉 Using the binary VerneMQ packages commercially (.deb/.rpm/Docker) requires a paid subscription.

@ioolkos
Copy link
Contributor

ioolkos commented May 6, 2024

@JoeBlackZ @805728578 I've now pushed Ubuntu Focal (& more) ARM64 versions for 2.0.0: https://github.com/vernemq/vernemq/releases/tag/2.0.0


👉 Thank you for supporting VerneMQ: https://github.com/sponsors/vernemq
👉 Using the binary VerneMQ packages commercially (.deb/.rpm/Docker) requires a paid subscription.

@JoeBlackZ
Copy link

@JoeBlackZ @805728578 I've now pushed Ubuntu Focal (& more) ARM64 versions for 2.0.0: https://github.com/vernemq/vernemq/releases/tag/2.0.0

👉 Thank you for supporting VerneMQ: https://github.com/sponsors/vernemq 👉 Using the binary VerneMQ packages commercially (.deb/.rpm/Docker) requires a paid subscription.

That's great. Thanks. @ioolkos

@805728578
Copy link
Author

@JoeBlackZ @805728578 I've now pushed Ubuntu Focal (& more) ARM64 versions for 2.0.0: https://github.com/vernemq/vernemq/releases/tag/2.0.0

👉 Thank you for supporting VerneMQ: https://github.com/sponsors/vernemq 👉 Using the binary VerneMQ packages commercially (.deb/.rpm/Docker) requires a paid subscription.

Thanks. @ioolkos

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants