You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 24, 2023. It is now read-only.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Not a problem exactly but a usability improvement. When Cook is configured with many pools, the cs usage subcommand can be difficult to read. It would be great if the default behavior would be to only show the pools where resources are being used.
Not sure if we even need --used-only: I think showing the pools with non-zero usage only should be the default, and then if you really need to see the quota / share for a pool with zero usage, you can use the existing --pool flag.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Not a problem exactly but a usability improvement. When Cook is configured with many pools, the
cs usage
subcommand can be difficult to read. It would be great if the default behavior would be to only show the pools where resources are being used.Describe the solution you'd like
Instead of returning something like:
It should return something like:
Since useful-pool is the only one with active jobs.
Maybe this is the side effect of adding a flag (--used-only, defaults=True) to cs usage.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Status-quo, not great.
Additional context
Credits to @dposada for the original idea.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: