We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Here is the latest update of this ticket for errors while disassembling 16b code with libasm:
Case on which I have a doubt:
mov (%esi,%esp,2),%cs:%ecx 66 2E 8B 0C 66 mov (%esi),%cs:%ds 2E 8E 1E
A certain nbr of operands (registers) are printed in 32b while it should be printed in 16b:
xor %ax,%eax 33 C0 or %ax,%eax 0B C0 cmp $0xFF,0xFFEA(%esi) 83 7E EA FF mov (%si),%es:%eax 26 8B 06 mov %eax,0xFFFC(%esi) 89 46 FC sbb (%si),%edx 1B 16 sub %dx,%edx 2B D2 cmp %eax,0xFFF8(%esi) 39 46 F8 mov 0xFFF8(%esi),%eax 8B 46 F8 mov %ax,0xC0330944 66 A3 44 09 33 C0 mov %al,0xFFFE(%esi) 88 46 FE cmp %al,0xFFFE(%esi) 38 46 FE mov 0xFFFE(%esi),%al 8A 46 FE
(and more...)
Ticket: 97 Reported by: camoroz0 on Thu Dec 4 21:50:59 2008 attachment: grub.img/boot sector attachment: stage1.S/Stage1.S attachment: stage1.h/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
[enioh] Just fixed the problem on call on intel 16 bits.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Here is the latest update of this ticket for errors while disassembling 16b code with libasm:
Case on which I have a doubt:
A certain nbr of operands (registers) are printed in 32b while it should be printed in 16b:
(and more...)
Ticket: 97 Reported by: camoroz0 on Thu Dec 4 21:50:59 2008
attachment: grub.img/boot sector
attachment: stage1.S/Stage1.S
attachment: stage1.h/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: