-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add separate, more detailed section for the Input Writer? #254
Comments
Yes, most definitely. It would be good to have a separate section with more elaborate examples, while keeping the "Getting Started" is kept short and simple. While doing this, it could be good to address #210 too. Executing the more elaborate examples int the unit tests would guarantee the examples keep working. (This also implies the necessary input files are present to run the examples, which would also be helpful.) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Adding things like non-standard basis set options (#221) are making it possible to do a lot of useful and complex things with the input writer, which is really exciting. However, when I was previously adding examples for using custom templates, I started to worry that the "Input Files" section of the getting started page was beginning to get pretty lengthy. Would it make sense to break out most of the input writer details into a new page, and leave just the basic usage in the getting started page?
@tovrstra @FarnazH @PaulWAyers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: