-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How did bamtocov deal with paired-end bam from stranded libraries? #9
Comments
Generally speaking, the algorithm counts each read with the strand it is reported in the BAM file. An approach I would advice could be to focus on either the first or the second pair, for example with the In bamtocounts 2.7 (https://telatin.github.io/bamtocov/tools/bamtocounts.html), for example, I added the As for the second question, |
@telatin Dear Dr. Telatin,
I'm curious about how
bamtocov
deal with paired-end bam from stranded libraries by setting with--stranded
.Will
bamtocov
automatically treat mated reads as reverse strand? For example, ifmate1
of a fragment was recorded as '-' strand in bam, which means thatmate1
are actually comes from '+' strand. When setting with--stranded
,mate1
will be counted as '+' strand. My question is, willmate2
of this fragment be automatically counted as '+' strand as well in this case?Also, will the new '--extendReads INT' parameter also work well with paired-end bam?
Best,
Keren
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: