-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simpler untrack call #12323
Comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Describe the problem
I found that I am using the following pattern frequently:
So data is a derived rune and used as a signal to trigger the execution of code inside of untrack block.
Inside of the untrack, there might be other state or derived runes that I do not want to track and trigger the code.
Describe the proposed solution
I would like to see if this is possible to save me from typing some extra layers of brackets:
If the above code does not follow Javascript syntax, would this be possible?
My goal here is to segregate signal runes and untracked code block to avoid typing an extra
( ) => { }
block.Can we put data into the input field, or multiple runes into the input field and use these input args as trigger signals to call the untrack block?
Importance
would make my life easier
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: