You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
it's worth not highlighting diffs for the first x, because it's just an artifact of an assembler optimization; the real diff is at the second x. We used to do this unconditionally, because IDO only ever emits branch likelies of this form, but with GCC it needs actual pattern matching.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
if both LHS and RHS match the pattern
it's worth not highlighting diffs for the first x, because it's just an artifact of an assembler optimization; the real diff is at the second x. We used to do this unconditionally, because IDO only ever emits branch likelies of this form, but with GCC it needs actual pattern matching.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: