-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 438
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Assumption about "accuracy" field #73
Labels
question
Further information is requested
Comments
No, that's right. As we wrote it's just an assumption as the values are in the same margin as the actual positioning error. We did not completely identify how the accuracy value is used and how it is generated. It's highly likely that the value itself is an assumption. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
In you paper under § 6.3 in the footer 3 you say "We assume that the accuracy value is encoded in metric meters as it matches the experimentally determined positioning error of the coordinates in the location reports, as we show in § 7". But the only clarification in § 7 which I could find is the table 6. Or am I overlooking something?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: