-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dump1090 segfault/coredump #69
Comments
@stevenfla, are you able to revert to self-building the container while I look into this? |
@stevenfla can I please trouble you to post the output of the following commands?
Thanks |
re-posting here. May have posted in the wrong place !
|
Thanks Mike. I can move back and forth to working image easily so this is not a problem. |
@stevenfla can you try the command |
I should explain - I want to see whether there's any additional information if you cause a segfault manually. |
Am currently running with no problem this container: mikenye/piaware:latest_nohealthcheck Quick note: sum ran on dump1090 executable in for both containers latest and latest_nohealthcheck match.
|
The fact it downloaded the image and then ran fine makes me wonder if something was wrong with the image you were previously running. If you change over to |
Good call on that one Mike and thank you. Problem is resolved. Removed all containers this time. Check for any remaining images and pulled new ones. Latest works now. |
That’s great to hear! Let me know if you have any more issues. :-) |
Wanted to make a final comment on this issue in that maybe it might be helpful to others. Summary: when moving hard drives between different hardware that use docker images be sure to remove and pull new docker images. |
This issue is open to track the issue with the segfault/coredump of dump1090.
This appears to be limited to x86_64 architecture.
a0241c9#commitcomment-45580597
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: