Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Obscure Option" keepalive 10 120 #8

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 19, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

"Obscure Option" keepalive 10 120 #8

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 19, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

I have this setting... not sure whether, as the server has it, it'll push it 
anyway.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 5 May 2012 at 10:23

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Thanks, I will add this as time permits.

Original comment by [email protected] on 7 May 2012 at 11:29

  • Added labels: Type-Enhancement, Priority-Low
  • Removed labels: Type-Defect, Priority-Medium

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I am sure about implementing this. After looking at the keepalive in detail the 
keepalive option has to be synchronised between the server and the client. So 
usually you want the server to push it anyway. Offering a client keepalive 
option that will be overwritten by the server anyway might be confusing

Original comment by [email protected] on 3 Jun 2012 at 1:01

  • Changed state: WontFix

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant