Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The training and testing human id are not consistent with NHP. #7

Open
pansanity666 opened this issue Feb 9, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

The training and testing human id are not consistent with NHP. #7

pansanity666 opened this issue Feb 9, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@pansanity666
Copy link

Hi,

It seems that the human split in ZjumocapDataset.py is not in line with the one used in NHP?
For example, the human used for training in GP-NeRF is 313, 377, 394, 315, 386, 390, while NHP uses 313, 377, 315, 386, 390, 392, 396 for training.

Best,
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@pansanity666