Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use sqlite-based cache by default, when available #29869

Open
2 tasks
HonkingGoose opened this issue Jun 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks

Use sqlite-based cache by default, when available #29869

HonkingGoose opened this issue Jun 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
core:cache priority-3-medium Default priority, "should be done" but isn't prioritised ahead of others status:requirements Full requirements are not yet known, so implementation should not be started type:refactor Refactoring or improving of existing code

Comments

@HonkingGoose
Copy link
Collaborator

Describe the proposed change(s).

Todos

  • Figure out way to deal with "install time compilation".
  • Let Renovate use the sqlite-based cache, if available.

Context

Rescuing an idea from getting lost in the Discussions. @viceice asked:

should we switch to the sqlite based cache by default if sqlite is available? it's much faster.

And @rarkins responded:

Yes but the install time compilation is unfortunately a problem for some

Related discussion

@HonkingGoose HonkingGoose added priority-3-medium Default priority, "should be done" but isn't prioritised ahead of others type:refactor Refactoring or improving of existing code status:requirements Full requirements are not yet known, so implementation should not be started core:cache labels Jun 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core:cache priority-3-medium Default priority, "should be done" but isn't prioritised ahead of others status:requirements Full requirements are not yet known, so implementation should not be started type:refactor Refactoring or improving of existing code
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant