We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I have not fully thought it through, but I am wondering, whether it would make sense to use the STAC types as metadata for Raster and RasterStack.
Or maybe it would make more sense to have a metadata interface which would be adhered by the STAC.jl types and the DimensionalData Metadata types.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I guess it will depend on the details of the STAC metadata?
We are also working on a raster interface over at JuliaGeo
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
I have not fully thought it through, but I am wondering, whether it would make sense to use the STAC types as metadata for Raster and RasterStack.
Or maybe it would make more sense to have a metadata interface which would be adhered by the STAC.jl types and the DimensionalData Metadata types.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: