Fallback to stdlib distutils
if setuptools._distutils
is missing
#4441
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary of changes
If
setuptools._distutils
is missing andSETUPTOOLS_USE_DISTUTILS
environment variable isn't set tostdlib
, importingsetuptools
will fail.This change fallsback to stdlib despite
SETUPTOOLS_USE_DISTUTILS=local
ifsetuptools._distutils
is missing and shows a warning for Python 3.11 and below.To test this, simply delete or rename
setuptools._distutils
(either with an editable install or directly in your site-packages) and setSETUPTOOLS_USE_DISTUTILS
to nothing orlocal
. I'd like to write a test for this and may need some pointers to get started since this test would include deleting files (or at least making an import inaccessible)Before:
After:
Closes #4439
The validity of this fix assumes that the user didn't themselves delete
setuptool._distutils
(messing up their own installation) and that distributing setuptools withoutsetuptools._distutils
and w/o setting an environment variable is a valid use-case. (sounds valid to me for vendor-stripped setuptools)Pull Request Checklist
newsfragments/
.(See documentation for details)