Yup, makes sense. I guess the key here is that I imagine going forward there are going to be trade offs when calling models, one being the "fast, cheap, not as intelligent", and the other end of the spectrum being "slower, more expensive, more intelligent".

[SimonBiggs]

          Yup, makes sense. I guess the key here is that I imagine going forward there are going to be trade offs when calling models, one being the "fast, cheap, not as intelligent", and the other end of the spectrum being "slower, more expensive, more intelligent".

Could change this to say MOST_INTELLIGENT and FASTEST? Or something like that to make it clear that it is relative?

Originally posted by @SimonBiggs in #1847 (comment)