Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparing trf to rtplan error #1812

Open
RemcoWouters95 opened this issue Oct 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Comparing trf to rtplan error #1812

RemcoWouters95 opened this issue Oct 26, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@RemcoWouters95
Copy link

RemcoWouters95 commented Oct 26, 2023

I wanted to automate our comparison of trf logfiles with rtplan dicom files. So i thought using pymedphys would come in handy. I only walked into the following error. I'm very new with pymedphys so it is perfectly plausible i made a mistake, but it looks like our BLD is not supported in the from_dicom method. Is there an other way to load the dicom files or am i doing something wrong?
(ps: new to github to, so if this is the wrong place to ask these questions let me know)


ValueError: Currently only DICOM files where the beam limiting devices consist of
one of the following combinations are supported:

  • {'ASYMY', 'MLCX'}

The provided RT Plan DICOM file has the following:

{'ASYMY', 'MLCX', 'ASYMX'}
@SimonBiggs
Copy link
Member

Hi @RemcoWouters95 :)

Here's the issue that is currently tracking this:
#1285

But not much movement has occurred there. It would be amazing if you can think of a solution that would work well :). We'd be more than happy to have your contribution :)

@sjswerdloff
Copy link
Collaborator

See #1768
You can try that branch to see if it works for you, and if you have success and your data has no PHI and are willing to share it, I could put that in as part of an automated test (and then I can request the merge).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants