You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
NeedsDecisionFeedback is required from experts, contributors, and/or the community before a change can be made.NeedsMoreDataWaiting for additional user feedback or case studies
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Sometimes, users are upgrading from installations that are very old - i.e. helm based installs that may even be config operator based ones that are years old.
while user may figure out their way for stand-alone installation - i.e. picking up a separate VM, making a clone of their config file and pointing it to a different database, this is more complicated for a kubernetes environment as the deployment is cluster-wide.
Describe the solution you'd like
We may introduce a way for users to install a specific Pomerium release without affecting an existing installation. With this approach, they may migrate some of their Ingresses by setting their spec.ingressClass: pomerium-0-21-0 without disturbing their existing Pomerium installation in a cluster.
If there are any use-cases that would help us understand the use/need/value please share them as they can help us decide on acceptance and prioritization.
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
desimone
added
NeedsMoreData
Waiting for additional user feedback or case studies
NeedsDecision
Feedback is required from experts, contributors, and/or the community before a change can be made.
labels
Feb 16, 2023
A usecase from me: I would like to upgrade the ingress controller (that I can avoid the issue you've described with an out-of-date pomerium), but atm I cannot due to pomerium/pomerium#4044 which is not yet in pomerium-ingress.
That would be solved if e.g. I were able to specify the used pomerium version. It could also be solved with coupling the releases of pomerium and pomerium-ingress (dunno how that would look like though)
Being able to use an arbitary image with pomerium-ingress would likely also help with pre-releases and PR//issue feedback (e.g. "it should be fixed in main, can you verify?")
NeedsDecisionFeedback is required from experts, contributors, and/or the community before a change can be made.NeedsMoreDataWaiting for additional user feedback or case studies
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Sometimes, users are upgrading from installations that are very old - i.e. helm based installs that may even be config operator based ones that are years old.
while user may figure out their way for stand-alone installation - i.e. picking up a separate VM, making a clone of their config file and pointing it to a different database, this is more complicated for a kubernetes environment as the deployment is cluster-wide.
Describe the solution you'd like
We may introduce a way for users to install a specific Pomerium release without affecting an existing installation. With this approach, they may migrate some of their Ingresses by setting their
spec.ingressClass: pomerium-0-21-0
without disturbing their existing Pomerium installation in a cluster.pomerium
=>pomerium-0-21-0
ingressClass
:pomerium
=>pomerium-0-21-0
global
=>global-0-21-0
Describe alternatives you've considered
Explain any additional use-cases
If there are any use-cases that would help us understand the use/need/value please share them as they can help us decide on acceptance and prioritization.
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: