Docs: adds JWT opaque token note to doc #669
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Deploy Preview for pomerium-docs ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings. |
ssveta7ak
approved these changes
Jun 7, 2023
wasaga
approved these changes
Jun 7, 2023
backport-actions-token bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2023
adds JWT opaque token note to doc
ZPain8464
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2023
Docs: adds JWT opaque token note to doc (#669) adds JWT opaque token note to doc Co-authored-by: zachary painter <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds a notice explaining the intended use of
pomerium_jwtas an opaque token when authenticating against the API.Fixes #662
Fixes #666